Reliability and Validity: A Comparison-Contrast of Two Articles Word Count: 500 (2 pages) Compare and contrast the confirmatory factor analysis approaches in the Tarafdar, Tu, Ragu-Nathan, and Ragu-Nathan (2009) article, "The Impact of Technostress on Role Stress and Productivity," with the Towler and Dipboye (2003) article, "Development of a Learning Style Orientation Measure." Include detailed analysis on reliability and validity…
The first article to be analyzed will be the Technostress article, with the second being the Development article. The definitions of validity and reliability will be examined with their relative application to the two articles being examined. A conclusion will be drawn about the research behind the articles. Validity basically is a test to see whether a test really functions effectively in order to garner results that it was designed to gather. According to Cherry (2011), “Validity is the extent to which a test measures what it claims to measure…results [must] be accurately applied and interpreted. Validity is… determined…by a body of research that demonstrates the relationship between the test and the behavior it is intended to measure” (pghs. 1-2). For example, in Tarafdar et. al.’s Technostress article, it is very clear that what was being measured was the effect of such stress and roles and productivity. The validity of that research would be that the research effectively measured what it set out to measure. In fact, according to Tarafdar et. al. ...
Cite this document
(“Reliability and Validity Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/other/19788-reliability-and-validity
(Reliability and Validity Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“Reliability and Validity Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/other/19788-reliability-and-validity.
Acceptability and trust are highly associated with the reality, what is seen or observed or measured, the information given and what the human logic could readily understand or perceive (Nooteboom, 2002; Damer, 2008; Carter, 2009). It is in line with this that reliability and validity are strongly linked with each other through a certain level of acceptability and trust.
Human services research, like every other research, is based on a set of propositions and concepts. In order to operationally define concepts we need to measure them. The process of measurement begins with the fundamental question “What has to be measured?
The paper is aimed to define and to discuss the concepts of reliability and validity in the research process. These concepts are considered statistically significant in proving data in research to be able to be accepted as scientific truth. Reliability defines the high level of trust on the recorded data thus can be repeated and replicated.
Social workers, youth counselors, and psychologists may all be considered to be human service providers. Professionals in the human services sector are greatly aided by experimental and other types of research. The researchers who offer this information are sometimes also a frontline service provider.
Personality tests are used in other areas such as individual and relationship counseling, as well as career planning and the development of the already existing employees in an organization (House & Johnson, 2002). Personality testing includes the presentation of some tests or questions to individuals, who then responds to such questions based on a rated scale, depending on how such items of the tests reflects their personal behavior.
Theoretical knowledge for the modern nurses is of high importance, because it leads to a personal development and self-perfection of a nurse. Modern scientific paradigms in nursing are triggering nurses’ learning: “there is nothing to be gained from the use of alternative terms which, on analysis, often prove to be identical to the traditional terms of reliability and validity” (Long & Johnson 2000, p.
It measures the extent to which tests or procedures assess the same characteristic, skill or quality. It is a measure of the precision between the observers or of the measuring instruments used in a study. It refers to how well all the test items relate to each other.
The ICI questionnaire is an adaptation of Duttweiler's 28 item inventory (Duttweiler, 2004). It is a measure of a person's belief in how much control they possess in their own life. The two extremes are those who believe they possess complete control in determining what they receive in life (the Internals), and those who believe that they have absolutely no control (the Externals).
Validity indicates the level by which a test measures a particular data it is supposed to measure.
Validity and reliability are two important concepts that measures the quality of the results and data gathered in