The No Child Left Behind Policy Reviewed Full name University name Education can be said to be the best means to success whether individually or at large and this is the reason why the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2002 is taking so much notice as government officials and other concerned citizens are looking into its strong and weak points considered for either revision or being carried out…
The strong and weak points of the law will be discussed in this paper in addition to the aforementioned information. When the NCLB was passed, a lot of politicians looked forward to its positive effects to the system of education in America considering all groups like the administrators, teachers, students and parents. In 2006, there have been positive reports about the act and heads have been nodding in approval to the statistics presented. The long term Nation’s Report Card results in 2005 claims that achievements in Math and Reading of elementary students reached the highest level and that achievement gaps were minimal (Ed.gov). The Department of Education gave similar reports on the statistics submitted in favor of the act and these were applauded during President George W. Bush’s 2008 State of the Union Address. He claimed that in 2007, fourth and eighth graders achieved the highest math scores on record, reading scores are on the rise and African-American and Hispanic students posted all-time highs (Bush). ...
Cite this document
(“No Child Left Behind Act Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/other/32326-no-child-left-behind-act
(No Child Left Behind Act Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“No Child Left Behind Act Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/other/32326-no-child-left-behind-act.
The act aimed at improving the education system of America. The main idea behind the act was to take measures to increase student achievements and hold states and schools accountable for the progress of the student body. The act brought several changes to the education system of public schools.
The Act came into existence during the tenure of President George W. Bush who described it as “the cornerstone of my administration” (Paige, 2002). The Act is a part certain major alterations in the educational system in the United States especially in the elementary as well as secondary education.
The Commission’s report on NCLB, titles “What can we do to make education better?” triggers thought and reflection. The report itself admits that perfection in the American education system is far cry, yet steps towards excellence re under scrutiny and constant innovation.
As with most large-scale government programs, the best parts are in its good intentions, while the worst parts are in the unintended consequences. While the Act's goal of having all public school students English proficient by 2014 may be unrealistic, the Act has dictated greater emphasis on reading and there are some areas of success.
The overall purpose of the law is to ensure that each child in America is able to meet the high learning standards of the state where he or she lives. The specific goals of the law, as spelled out in the Federal Register issued on March 6, 2002" (No child left behind).
In this regard, this paper will look into some of these underlying essential ideas as brought about by people who are in the position to affect the repealing or embracing of the law. As every good law is removed or retained,
The action has been successful in reducing the gap between the minority and the majority as well as improving the test scores of both the minority and the majority (Tavakolian & Howell, 2012).
The no child left
Through the act, the bridge between the minority and the majority groups has been reduced. The standard test scores have also been greatly enhanced by the action through the accountability initiative program advocated by the act.
The no child left behind act of 2001 has been
ducation policy, the critics, on the other hand, refer to it as a revolutionary federal incursion flowing into the states’ historic domain which leaves too many unfunded burdens” (Barbara 2005). However, the NCLB Act increases the Federal government’s management of local