Kant and Mill Ideologies - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare

Extract of sample
Kant and Mill Ideologies

Indeed, Mill claims that people should value the principle of utility as a tool that derives secondary moral principles, which promote general happiness. The fundamental principle of morality means that happiness is intended pleasure and absence of pain where right actions promote happiness while wrong actions produce the reverse of happiness, which is unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure. As such, we can judge people’s actions based on the secondary principles, which promote general happiness. On the other hand, Immanuel Kant defines the fundamental principle of morality as the Categorical Imperative which basis moral requirements on a standard of rationality. He refers to the fundamental principle of morality as the law of an autonomous will where moral reasons are supreme to any other reason. Ideally, one formulation of Kant’s Categorical Imperative encourages individuals to act on a motivational thought that one can consistently urge the society to adopt as a universal law as it will derive equal worth and equal respect. Notably, the Mill and Kant's fundamental principle of morality differ. Indeed, Mill abhors the utilitarian, which defines general happiness as a secondary moral principle that refers to happiness as intended pleasure and absence of pain, while Kant defines moral requirements and moral worthiness as acts of good will. ...Show more

Summary

The fundamental principle of morality means that happiness is intended pleasure and absence of pain where right actions promote happiness while wrong actions produce the reverse of happiness, which is unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure…
Author : gkoch
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write a custom essay on your topic
"Kant and Mill Ideologies"
with a personal 20% discount.
Find out more

Related Essays

How are the categorical imperative (Kant) and/or the greatest happiness principle (Mill) applied in law?
For example, the rules that have been laid down, punishments for going against outlined laws and the reasons why these punishments are there must be considered for laws to be effective. There are different theories that help to approach the concept of obedience to the law and reasons for punishment.
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
Comparing Philosophical Positions of Kant and of John Stuart Mill
In the modern global context it is very important to be aware of philosophical ideas of the leading philosophers. Many ideas of famous philosophers are the basic for many modern scholars’ theories. Different analyses are made through the prism of these ideas.
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
Kant
According to Kant, human beings and all other creatures that are rational tend to not only have ends but also have intrinsic value. Because of this, he states that it is not moral for human beings to use each other as means for their own ends. Kant further states that the principle of humanity and any creature that is rational as an end in itself are not borrowed from experience, moreover it is clear that all those rational beings are members of a universal kingdom of ends.
6 pages (1500 words) Essay
Relationship between Morality and Happiness based on Kant and Mill
This paper seeks to answer the question: is the morally right thing to do the one that produces happiness? Theologians and philosophers debate the question between right and wrong and the satisfaction drawn from doing things backed by moral justifications.
8 pages (2000 words) Essay
Plato and Aristotle Theories
According to Melchert the term universal means a general concept (11). The nature of universals is argued by Plato and Aristotle (Greek Philosophers) in different ways. Plato argued that all things or a property have a universal form. This form can be related to other things.
3 pages (750 words) Admission/Application Essay
Kant, Mill, and Nietzsche
This is an ethics issue. First we have to define how these three philosophers look at ethics and morals. The three of them have different views on ethics, especially metaethics. For Nietzsche, moral values are arbitrary; while for Kant and Mill, morals are innate.
3 pages (750 words) Essay
Compare And Contrast The Theories Advanced By Mill And Kant By Applying Them To A Specific Situation.
Capital punishment is basically death punishment or the penalty to death or the act of executing. This act is committed by the state for any such crime that has been committed and requires execution. There are many ways to implement this punishment such as shooting, hanging to death, by keeping in gas chambers, decapitating the convicted or by injecting lethal injections etc.
3 pages (750 words) Research Paper
Contemporary Philosophical or Political Thought
Early philosophies help to show the similarities and differences between the ancient and current moral and political thoughts. They also show how different concepts have been shifting with time and help people to find new ideas by applying the old ones. There two great philosophers who have contributed a lot of philosophical or political ideologies in history which are applicable in the current world namely; John Stuart Mill's and his philosophy of Utilitarianism and Immanuel Kant who greatly discussed Metaphysics of Morals.
5 pages (1250 words) Essay
answering three questions
As St Thomas Aquinas asserted, law deficient of moral content is “pervasive”. Natural law is founded on the tenet that despite the fact that nature contains man, he also has his own nature, which is to
6 pages (1500 words) Essay
Find out how much would it cost
to get a custom paper written by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
YOUR PRIZE:
Apply my DISCOUNT