StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

Kant and Mill Ideologies - Essay Example

Not dowloaded yet

Extract of sample
Kant and Mill Ideologies

Indeed, Mill claims that people should value the principle of utility as a tool that derives secondary moral principles, which promote general happiness. The fundamental principle of morality means that happiness is intended pleasure and absence of pain where right actions promote happiness while wrong actions produce the reverse of happiness, which is unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure. As such, we can judge people’s actions based on the secondary principles, which promote general happiness. On the other hand, Immanuel Kant defines the fundamental principle of morality as the Categorical Imperative which basis moral requirements on a standard of rationality. He refers to the fundamental principle of morality as the law of an autonomous will where moral reasons are supreme to any other reason. Ideally, one formulation of Kant’s Categorical Imperative encourages individuals to act on a motivational thought that one can consistently urge the society to adopt as a universal law as it will derive equal worth and equal respect. Notably, the Mill and Kant's fundamental principle of morality differ. Indeed, Mill abhors the utilitarian, which defines general happiness as a secondary moral principle that refers to happiness as intended pleasure and absence of pain, while Kant defines moral requirements and moral worthiness as acts of good will....
Indeed, Will objects to the idea that pleasure is the only good, it is the highest good, and it is universal (Booher 1). He claims that there are things that people consider and that there are differences in quantity and qualities of pleasure where certain pleasures are more desirable and valuable than others in relation to moral deliberations (Booher 1). Notably, Mill’s objection to the argument against utilitarianism should reckon the distinct value that pleasures attract with higher pleasures having more value than lower pleasures. It should also distinguish between the quantity and quality of pleasure as well as favor some activities as being better than others are. More so, his argument should address the problems that relate to differentiating quantities and qualities of pleasure. Ideally, Mill's account of higher pleasures answers the objection by demonstrating that certain pleasures are better and valuable than others (Booher 1). It also negates the idea that pleasure is highest natural good and confirms that higher pleasure is the basic principle of ethics, and the foundation of morality. According to Mill, human beings are different from non-human animals in a morally interesting way. Ideally, Mil noted that animals are irrational and are not self-aware or did not have cognitive capabilities as human beings. As such, he established that human beings are different from animals because human beings can experience mental pleasures and interestingly prefer mental pleasure to body pleasures (“John Start Mill” 1). He supports this by asserting that individuals who enjoy all pleasures qualify as the only judges who equally crave for mental pleasures. ...Show more

Summary

The fundamental principle of morality means that happiness is intended pleasure and absence of pain where right actions promote happiness while wrong actions produce the reverse of happiness, which is unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure…
Author : gkoch
Kant and Mill Ideologies essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Kant and Mill Ideologies"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Related Essays

Kant vs Mill
According to Kant, an act can be deemed as appropriate and right if the individual originally did the act considering it as his/her moral obligation. In view of Kant, it is just nothing else but duty that can entitle an act as right (Schwartz). Kant thinks that duty essentially makes the actions morally sound and justified as compared to their maxims.
2 pages (500 words) Essay
Kant, Mill and Socrates (Meno) on deontology and utilitarian scenario
The actions taken if Bin Laden is still the active head of Al Qaeda and seeking to dispatch further terrorists for destruction would require specific actions. This would be based first on the ideologies of morality and what the responses would be in terms of deontological and utilitarian theories.
10 pages (2500 words) Essay
How are the categorical imperative (Kant) and/or the greatest happiness principle (Mill) applied in law
For example, the rules that have been laid down, punishments for going against outlined laws and the reasons why these punishments are there must be considered for laws to be effective. There are different theories that help to approach the concept of obedience to the law and reasons for punishment.
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
Comparing Philosophical Positions of Kant and of John Stuart Mill
In the modern global context it is very important to be aware of philosophical ideas of the leading philosophers. Many ideas of famous philosophers are the basic for many modern scholars’ theories. Different analyses are made through the prism of these ideas.
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
Relationship between Morality and Happiness based on Kant and Mill
This paper seeks to answer the question: is the morally right thing to do the one that produces happiness? Theologians and philosophers debate the question between right and wrong and the satisfaction drawn from doing things backed by moral justifications.
8 pages (2000 words) Essay
Kant, Mill, and Nietzsche
This is an ethics issue. First we have to define how these three philosophers look at ethics and morals. The three of them have different views on ethics, especially metaethics. For Nietzsche, moral values are arbitrary; while for Kant and Mill, morals are innate.
3 pages (750 words) Essay
Kant and Mill
Thus Kant ventures into a study that tries to supply the principles of moral action as such, or tries to supply the principles for "rational beings in general," which we can interpret in this context as moral subjects. One can found the same tension in Kant's ethical writings.
5 pages (1250 words) Essay
Kant vs. Mill
The first one makes says that people at all time must act appropriately and the second rules promotes the value of respect and says that well being of all individuals is important and therefore, one should not use others for their own
2 pages (500 words) Essay
Kant and Mill
good in itself” (Driver 80). He define right by reference to the good—usually, the good that the action produces (Driver 80). Kant also
2 pages (500 words) Essay
Aristotle, Mill, Kant
Aristotle also believes that happiness is not achievable unless the person in pursuit of it has attained the state of morality (Talbot, 2005). "The creed which accepts as the foundation
1 pages (250 words) Essay
Get a custom paper written
by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
YOUR PRIZE:
Apply my DISCOUNT
Comments (0)
Rate this paper:
Thank you! Your comment has been sent and will be posted after moderation