Course Date An Argument Paper in Favor of DONATION It is the moral responsibility of every human being to help those in need of help with everything they can, no matter how geographically distanced the needy lives. However, many people have a different point of view regarding this notion…
For example, we do not allow students to cheat in the exams or people to violate speed regulations just because they think it is a fun thing to do. There are laws which restrict such behavior which is considered moral relativism. Similarly, not donating to the needy can also be termed as moral relativism and must be discouraged. Another moral obligation which most people agree to is saving a drowning child. It does not matter whether the drowning child is related to us or is our responsibility at all. All that matters is that a human being is in distress and it is our moral duty to save him even at the cost of sacrificing our own comfort or belongings. We just cannot shy away from the responsibility by say that “he’s not my baby” or “I was not babysitting for him”. Similar is the case of donating a reasonable amount of money to the children who are striving to stay alive because of famine or hunger throughout the world. At this point it should be clearly understood that it does not matter whether the children you are donating for are of the same country, religion or cast. Similar to saving the drowning child who could be an American, a non-Christian or even a migrant, what matters is that we have to help a human being in distress even it means sacrificing our own belongings. ...
Comparable to this is an example of a person who does not choose to donate to the needy and therefore exercises the right to choose a wrong attitude. In fact, such people might not be in a proper moral condition to feel the situation in which the needy are. Suitable sympathetic feeling for the needy can be experienced only after appropriate reflection and research which would enable people to determine the extent of help they can and should extend. This would not only facilitate righteous self development but also enable individuals to live their lives as they deem fit. If a wealthy individual is enjoy sunbathing at luxurious beach hotels or balls at casinos while million others are in dire need of some part of his wealth then it is morally wrong for him to live his life as per his choice; saying “I have earned the money and I have a right to spend it as I please”. Some people also oppose the notion that it is our moral responsibility to help those in need by saying that although they have a responsibility towards those whom they have wronged, they do not have any responsibility towards those whom they have not wronged (Singer 28). This can be termed as an extreme view for the fact that if this argument is accepted as reasonable, no charity would work for the jobless, the disabled or the famine stricken people. This also entails that help to needy should also not be restricted in boundaries of one’s neighborhood, city or even country. Help should and must be extended to all without prejudice to boundaries in a manner that one is fulfilling a moral obligation. Some people feel that USA is already giving generously in terms of aid to underdeveloped nations, which is enough and there is no need to donate more ...
Cite this document
(“Argument paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/105377-argument-paper
(Argument Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Argument Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/105377-argument-paper.
Xuding Wang claims “Kate Chopin explores feminine selfhood in a patriarchal society through the heroine’s spiritual journey to freedom in ‘The Story of an Hour.” (Wang 107) While arguing his position Wang very often says that Chopin’s protagonist Louise continually searches for her selfhood.
This has been the accepted practice of most cultures over the last few thousand years. However, there is also a religious component to the argument that says that humans should not tamper with marriage. This paper will look at some reasons why gay marriage should not be allowed and will also counter an argument for gay marriage.
Certain democratic nations accept the act and they do not require a reason for that act. Certain nations have adopted a time period limit of pregnancy after which abortion is not allowed. In the region of Denmark as well as France the pregnancy period after which abortion is not allowed in 12 weeks, on the other hand no such limits have been set by Canada (UN 125).
Since the early 1990s, health professionals and researchers have reported a decrease in the number of cancer deaths, something that indicates that the rate of cancer is slowly decreasing in the U.S. However, according to the annual reports from the American Cancer Association, since 2004, the rate of cancer in has dramatically decreased from 2004.
Climate change has made people more aware of the problem. This year many droughts and wildfires in the United States and in other parts of the world have been discussed on the news. Climate change has been shown to have a negative impact on the quality of life of people everywhere.
My secondary audiences, especially the youth, want participation in resolving their issues, so I believe that my argument will be appealing to them. Audience-subject relationship The government is working to stop the practice of texting while driving through state bans in several states and the active participation of the U.S.
This movement works to give animals the same resources and rights as those given to human beings. Thus, according to this argument animals are not only wrongfully used for food and clothing but also seen as
In explaining this thesis, I draw information about Frankenstein as portrayed in Mary Shelley’s work and explore his actions.
I choose to defend Frankenstein since he is always trying to explore what is going on in the