You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Pages 3 (753 words)
Student Name Instructor’s Name Course Date An Argument Paper in Favor of DONATION It is the moral responsibility of every human being to help those in need of help with everything they can, no matter how geographically distanced the needy lives. However, many people have a different point of view regarding this notion.
For example, we do not allow students to cheat in the exams or people to violate speed regulations just because they think it is a fun thing to do. There are laws which restrict such behavior which is considered moral relativism. Similarly, not donating to the needy can also be termed as moral relativism and must be discouraged. Another moral obligation which most people agree to is saving a drowning child. It does not matter whether the drowning child is related to us or is our responsibility at all. All that matters is that a human being is in distress and it is our moral duty to save him even at the cost of sacrificing our own comfort or belongings. We just cannot shy away from the responsibility by say that “he’s not my baby” or “I was not babysitting for him”. Similar is the case of donating a reasonable amount of money to the children who are striving to stay alive because of famine or hunger throughout the world. At this point it should be clearly understood that it does not matter whether the children you are donating for are of the same country, religion or cast. Similar to saving the drowning child who could be an American, a non-Christian or even a migrant, what matters is that we have to help a human being in distress even it means sacrificing our own belongings. ...
Not exactly what you need?