You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Is it morally permissible to kill one innocent person as a means to saving some larger number of innocent people's lives? Why
Pages 7 (1757 words)
Name: Course: Date: Introduction Moral ethics is a very contradictory subject that requires careful consideration and evaluation. Throughout history the society has been struggling to understand what is the right thing to do or what is wrong given the circumstances and according to moral standards of the society.
However, according to Kantian principle, our duty is to do certain things irrespective of the motive, at least not from a sense of duty. Sometimes one may do something he or she thinks is the right thing to do but in the end the act is wrong. For example, killing one person to save more others may seem right but killing is a crime and as such it is wrong no matter what reason it was intended. So what makes right acts right? Is morality relative or absolute? These are questions that we need to ask ourselves in order to standard ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ actions. The specific ethical issue to be tackled by this paper is whether it is permissible to kill one innocent person as a means to saving some larger number of innocent people’s lives. I will argue that it is morally permissible to kill one innocent person as it leads to the greatest good of all at least based on Professor Moore’s moral theory. There is no question that society aims at ensuring the happiness of all and this would be achieved if many lives are saved. The argument in this case, is the means to achieve this goal. Is it by sacrificing an innocent person or allowing others to die? In order to answer this question, we need to understand what it means to be morally permissible. ...
Not exactly what you need?