Philosophy of Ethics final exam

Philosophy of Ethics final exam Essay example
Undergraduate
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 3 (753 words)
Download 0
Final Exam Essay Questions 1. Case scenario: You are a doctor who is treating a patient who is in tears. Should you hug this patient? Using two ethical approaches provide arguments of the pros and cons of this action. A hug between a doctor and patient must be in an appropriate context, and there must be a sense of eagerness between the recipient and the giver of a hug (Clark, 2012)…

Introduction

In the virtue approach, an ethical action is one that is grounded with virtues, such as honesty, fairness, compassion, and integrity, and once they become a habit, they transform into traits of a person (Velasquez et al., 1996). From this notion, it can be said that a hug from a medical practitioner can be positive if the doctor and the patient both have virtues with pertinence to such an act (Baum, 2011), but the negative aspect about this act is that patients may not receive the feeling of comfort if they are not used to this kind of action with anyone else. Similarly, doctors may not give the right comfort the patient wants if it is not in their disposition to hug (Clark, 2012). 2. How important are the consequences of our actions when making moral decisions? The consequences of one’s actions are very significant when making moral decisions to the extent that one must assess divergent forms of actions by getting the facts, or through the different forms of results of such an action. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Philosophy Ethics
Mill explained this rule with the aid of the principle of utility. According to this principle which is also sometimes referred to as the principle of happiness, for a person to be happy himself he should consider the happiness of others to be as important as his own happiness (Mills 1867). This philosophy of happiness was further explained by John Stuart Mill with the assistance of his theories…
Final exam
Rather people are caught up with work issues that lead to stressful lifestyles. Philosophers Josef Pieper and Thoreau, Henry David both agree, with this idea of too much work being a hindrance to true happiness in a person’s life. Thoreau in his Walden and other writing book writes that, the reason he chose a solitude life for two years in a cabin in Walden Pond was in order to have more time to…
Senior Philosophy EXAM 3 Study Guide
Hence, Epicurus concluded that we should not live in fear of death (Epicurus, 510). 2. According to Dawkins, animal fighting is restrained and gentlemanly in the following way. Animals do not necessarily fight to eliminate their rivals because, by doing that, they would mostly likely be endangering their lives even more. Dawkins argues that in a complex system of rivals, it might be advantageous…
Final exam Essay
Socrates Socrates had taken a crucial role of caring for people’s souls in their life, and they had a conviction that the real persons are the souls; thus, through their arguments it is evident that a person’s soul is the center of their character (Richard and Elder, 1). Moreover, the Socrates argued that the souls is the basis through which people think, feel, set values and make decision;…
Philosophy Ethics
On the contrary, those with slave morality do make villains out of their masters and wish to make them slaves as well. Notably, master morality is associated with the powerful and the strong individuals, whereas slave morality represents the weak willed who are oppressed and abused, and they are expected to be submissive to their masters. However, both slave and master morality are expressive to…
Final exam questi
The paper concludes by giving a personal opinion on Mackie’s position regarding coexistence between God and evil. Introduction to the Problem of Evil The problem of evil is the greatest intellectual impediment to the belief in the existence of a supreme being, God. The big question that underlies this issue is that, if the idea of existence of an omnipotent being holds, then why is there evil in…
Ethics Philosophy
Second, Mill considers the possible grounds of justification for this mindset: the higher party's position, he says, could be attributed to pride, love of freedom, love of autonomy, or to the love of power or excitement. But, he returns, justification of holding onto one's position, refusing to trade places regardless of the degree of happiness of the pig/fool that surpasses his/hers, rests in…