StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Ethical Issues: The Utilitarian and Deontological Theories of Ethics - Term Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
"Ethical Issues: The Utilitarian and Deontological Theories of Ethics" paper applies these two theories of ethics to concrete cases. The cases are, keeping a promise, abortion, and Euthanasia. Two books are used: Practical Ethics by Singer, and Ground Work of the Metaphysics of Morals by Kant…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.2% of users find it useful
Ethical Issues: The Utilitarian and Deontological Theories of Ethics
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Ethical Issues: The Utilitarian and Deontological Theories of Ethics"

? Henry Nabea # Philosophy # 3 May, Ethical Issues In Ethics, there are a number of ethical theories that forms the basis of making ethical decisions. The theory of ethics that one subscribes to determines the kind of ethical decisions they will make in a given ethical dilemma. The two main theories of Ethics that have traditionally had a lot of influence in the world o Ethics are, the utilitarian theory of Ethics, and the Deontological theory of Ethics. The application of these two different theories of Ethics to particular and concrete ethical dilemmas yields different results and this leads to controversies among the proponents of different theories of Ethics. This paper applies these two theories of ethics on particular concrete cases. The cases are, keeping/breaking a promise, abortion, and Euthanasia. As sources of information, two books are used: Practical Ethics, by Peter Singer, and Ground Work of the Metaphysics of Morals, by Emmanuel Kant. Before applying the two ethical theories to the above cases, it is important to first give an overview of each of the theories. To begin with, the utilitarian theory of ethics is an end based theory. In other words, in determining the morality of an action, the proponents of utilitarian theory will focus on the end result of the action, and if the end product of the action will result in greater good to the majority of people, i.e. if the action will maximize happiness for the majority, then the action is a morally right action (Singer, 3). On the contrary, if the action diminishes happiness, or makes the majority of people to suffer, then the action is morally wrong. Deontological theory of Ethics on the other hand is based on the law or the duty ( Kant, 13-15). This means that an action is regarded as being morally right if it is done in accordance with the requirements of the law, or in fulfilment of one’s obligation. Conversely, an action is regarded as being morally wrong if it is in contradiction with the established law, or ones’ obligations in life. Application of Utilitarian and Deontological theories of Ethics to particular ethical issues Keeping/Breaking a promise In determining the morality of the action of either keeping or breaking a promise on the basis of deontological theory of Ethics, the main question that we should ask ourselves is whether or not the act of breaking or keeping the promise is in line with our obligations or the law. Emmanuel Kant, one of the main proponents of deontological theory of Ethics argues, in his famous categorical imperative, that before taking an action, we should ask ourselves whether we would wish our manner of acting to be made into a universal law applicable to all similar cases (Kant, 18). Kant, therefore, is of the view that we have the obligation to treat others as we would like to be treated. In this sense, breaking a promise that we have made is morally wrong because we would also not like somebody who has promised us something to fail to keep their promise. We should always keep our promises since we have an obligation to fulfil what we have promised to do. A utilitarian on the other hand would base their judgement on the consequence or the end result of either breaking or keeping ones promise. If the action will maximize the interests of the majority, then the action is morally right, and on the contrary, if the action will result in diminishing happiness to the majority of people, then the act is morally wrong. On this basis, a utilitarian wouldn’t give a definitive answer on whether the act of keeping or breaking a promise is intrinsically wrong or right. A utilitarian will conclude that the morality of the action of either keeping or breaking a promise will greatly depend on the particular circumstance at hand. If the circumstance is such that keeping or breaking a promise will lead to greater happiness for the majority, then the action is morally right and if the action will lead to suffering of the majority of people, then the action is morally wrong. Abortion The main controversy in the issue of abortion lies in the question of whether or not a foetus is a human being. The position that one will adopt on this issues will determine the moral judgement that they will make concerning the whole issue of abortion. There are scholars who contend that foetus cannot be regarded as human being, or a human person, simply because they are not self conscious and therefore, they are just like other non-human animals. Peter Singer subscribes to this view (Singer, 150). For such scholars, we should regard abortion not as the killing of a human being, but as killing any other non-human animals. Other ethicists are of the contrary view that foetuses, though still in the process of development, are indeed human beings (Singer, 149). From a deontological point of view, we have a moral obligation to adhere to the established laws and norms guiding our behaviour. So, as long as long as the law prescribes against abortion, then from the deontological point of view we should never abort because we have the moral obligation to obey our laws. Secondly, as Immanuel Kant put it in his theory of Ethics, we should always treat human beings as ends in themselves, but never as means to an end (Kant, 51). So, from this basis, as long as you conceive foetus as a human being, then it is unethical to abort the foetus for any other reason because by so doing, you will be treating the foetus (human being), as a mean to an end but not as an end in itself. But if you hold the contrary view that foetuses are not human beings, you may abort for any other reason because you wouldn’t be dealing with human beings, but non-human beings. From the utilitarian perspective, there are two determinants on the morality of abortion. First is the conception that one has on whether or not foetuses can be termed as human beings. The second determinant is the impact of the end result of abortion; will abortion lead to the maximization of happiness to the greatest number of people? Some utilitarians, like Peter Singer, are of the view that it is morally wrong to kill an autonomous, self conscious being (human being) with hopes and aspiration for the future (Singer, 131-132). And on this ground, if one holds the view that foetuses are human beings, then it is morally wrong to kill such foetuses. But if one is of the contrary view, like Peter Singer, that foetuses aren’t human beings, then it is morally justifiable to abort. And, if the act of abortion will lead to the happiness of the majority of people, then it is morally right and it should be procured, but if the act of abortion will lead to contrary results, then it is morally wrong to abort. Euthanasia There are three types of Euthanasia, voluntary Euthanasia, involuntary Euthanasia, and non-voluntary Euthanasia (Singer, 176-180). Voluntary Euthanasia refers to the Euthanasia whereby one has consented, or even requested for Euthanasia to end their lives. Involuntary Euthanasia refers to the Euthanasia in which one hasn’t consented to the Euthanasia, either because they have not been asked, or they have been asked and chooses to live (Singer, 179). Non-voluntary Euthanasia, on the other hand, refers to Euthanasia in which one is not capable of consenting, either because they are in comma or any other health problem. From the deontological perspective, we have the moral obligation to act in accordance with the laws and regulations guiding our behaviour. This means that in the case of Euthanasia, we should act in accordance with the laws and regulations on Euthanasia. In this sense, practising Euthanasia in a country where it is legally accepted would be morally right, and practising it where it is not legally accepted would be morally wrong. From the utilitarian perspective, the end result of Euthanasia should determine whether the act is morally right or wrong. If Euthanasia will result in greater happiness to the majority of people, then it is morally right to do it and vice versa. Peter Singer argues that as long as there is no hope of recovery for a sick person, and the person is in excruciating pain, it is morally right for such a person to be assisted to die if they request to be assisted (Singer, 193). And if they are incapable of consenting to Euthanasia, we should go ahead and assist them to die, but if the person wishes to continue living in pain, rather than dying, we should respect their autonomy and allow them to continue living. A critical look at the moral judgements reached by applying deontological theory of Ethics and Utilitarian theory of Ethics on these three controversial Ethical issues shows that the judgements reached by applying utilitarian theory of Ethics is by far, the more practical and rational decisions. The main weakness in deontological theory of Ethics is that it relies so much on the established laws and regulations guiding our behaviour and this leaves little room, if any, for critical evaluation of the particular case at hand before we make moral judgements. But utilitarian theory of Ethics gives us the opportunity to evaluate the consequences of our actions, and to make moral judgements based on the consequences or the results of our actions. Hence I prefer utilitarian theory of Ethics to deontological theory of Ethics. Works Cited Kant, I. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. (Wood, A. trans.).London: Yale University Press, 2002. Singer, P. Practical Ethics. 2nd edt. UK: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Philopsphy paper Term Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Philopsphy paper Term Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1476801-philopsphy-paper
(Philopsphy Paper Term Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
Philopsphy Paper Term Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1476801-philopsphy-paper.
“Philopsphy Paper Term Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1476801-philopsphy-paper.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Ethical Issues: The Utilitarian and Deontological Theories of Ethics

The branches of philosophy

This paper explores these ethical perspectives, reviews relevant perspectives on ethics as an academic discipline, reflects the relevance of ethics among individuals and society, and identifies the key ethical perspectives, values and principles that would most benefit individuals and society.... The eight weeks course has convinced me of the significance of having a thorough knowledge regarding one's personal code of ethics-a self-discovery of what one's primary ethical lens is....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Paper on hotel rwanda

Hotel Rwanda) In a time when ethics and morality may seem lost and ones internal compass might spin out of control given all of the factors present in the film, assigning a philosophical school of thought to Paul's actions in Hotel Rwanda, given the only option between Utilitarianism and Deontology, is an interesting task.... Utilitarianism, essentially, bases decision making on whatever is best for the majority group that causes the least amount of harm, which creates the means to universal happiness and least amount of pain; while the deontological perspective focuses on one's individual duties one owes to others....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Protecting Personally Identifiable Information and other ethical issues

Breach of these doctrines, having been established as legal or moral rules and obligations, therefore implies lack of ethics subject to deontology theory.... Protecting personality identifiable information and other ethical issues Name: Institution: Tutor name: Course: Date: July 21, 2013 Protecting personality identifiable information and other ethical issues Law and ethics are general and popular guiding principles in people's actions and interactions....
3 Pages (750 words) Research Paper

The Drug Marketing Strategies of Pharmaceutical Companies

The example of the marketing practices with reference to the drug above is a useful starting point for the analysis of the broader marketing practices from utilitarian and deontological perspectives.... the utilitarian's posit the view that actions should be pursued if they result in the overall good of the people and promote social welfare and happiness for the maximum number of people.... Contrast this with the utilitarian principles that advocate consequences of actions as opposed to the action itself in deontology (Halbert & Ingulli, 2008)....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Current Issues in Business Ethics

The study of business ethics, therefore, outlines how the actions and conduct of businesses can be explored and understood from the perspective of the existing theories of ethics.... The study of business ethics therefore outlines as to how the actions and conduct of the businesses can be actually explored and understood from the perspective of the existing theories of the ethics.... There are however, different theories of deontology which outline as to how to actually treat an issue from certain perspectives....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

What Are the Ethical Postives and Negatives of Stem Cell Research

deontological theories are frequently characterized as rule-based, as Kantian deontology is and as a Divine Command Theory is.... From this, we also realize that deontological theories presuppose kinds, or that acts have intrinsic natures that cannot be changed and are absolute.... n contrast, Divine Command Theory and deontological ethics are used to justify opposition to the use of embryonic stem cells in research.... thical theories are divided into two broad categories: teleological and deontological, and the debate concerning embryonic stem cells conforms perfectly to this distinction....
8 Pages (2000 words) Term Paper

Business Ethics: Resolving Ethical Dilemmas

This theory pays more attention to the moral character of the individual undertaking a given decision instead of looking at the duty or consequences of a given action as stated by the utilitarian and deontological theories.... ompare and contrast the utilitarian, libertarian, deontological and virtue ethics perspectives on the dilemma(s) you have identified ... One of the most important contributors to deontology is Immanuel Kant who stated that actions are viewed to be right when based entirely on a sense of duty and not based on the happiness for the greatest number of individuals as stipulated by the utilitarian theory....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Possibility of Ethical Justification of Capital Punishment

For this reason, Australians are expected to abide by the existing code of ethics.... The Australian Association of Social Workers (AASW) Code of ethics and Australian Public Service Code of Conduct offer both social workers and public workers a basis for ethical decision making and reflection.... Furthermore, this view is supported to some extent by the utilitarian.... According to the utilitarian theory, capital punishment does not connote offering justice through an ‘eye for an eye' approach (Townsend, 1997)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us