StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Kant and the Unlicensed Engineer - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This paper 'Kant and the Unlicensed Engineer' tells that The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the case of the unlicensed engineer using the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Author will provide a detailed description of Kant’s deontological ethics as well as his retributivist theory of punishment. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.6% of users find it useful
Kant and the Unlicensed Engineer
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Kant and the Unlicensed Engineer"

Kant and the Unlicensed Engineer The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the case of the unlicensed engineer using the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. I will provide a detailed description of Kant’s deontological ethics as well as his retributivist theory of punishment. I will then reiterate the important aspects of the case and apply Kant’s theories to the case, demonstrating that according to Kant, Charles Landers’ behavior is immoral and the punishment imposed by Judge Wolverton is adequate. Finally I will argue that despite some shortcoming, Kant’s theory is the best for use in professional life. Kant’s theory of morality is categorized as deontological, which means its based in the idea that you have the moral duty to always pursue or avoid certain actions. Deontological ethics are often described in opposition to consequentialist ethics, which evaluate the morality of an action entirely on its consequences. A consequentialist will maintain that regardless of the act committed, if it results in an overall benefit to everyone involved, that act is permissible, and if it results in a greater amount of harm than good, then it is not permissible. In contrast a deontologist evaluates the morality of an act strictly on the act itself. Even if following your moral duty results in dire consequences, you must still strictly adhere to it. Kant’s particular version of deontological ethics is based in what he calls the Categorical Imperative. This is a system used to determine which actions are your duty to carry out or avoid. The system works as follows: to decide whether an act is moral first formulate a rule that summarizes your reason for committing the act (Johnson, sec. 5). Then, conceptualize what would result if the rule were made a universal law, such that anyone in any circumstance must always follow it (Johnson, sec. 5). Third, see whether a world is even conceivable where every person must act upon that rule, and if it is conceivable, whether you would rationally will that it become an obligatory law (Johnson, sec. 5). If so, then that action is morally permissible (Johnson, sec. 5). Kant further delineates categories of duties based upon results gained from the Categorical Imperative. These categories are perfect duties, imperfect duties, and morally permissible acts. If you formulate a maxim, which fails the third step in the CI, then it is a perfect duty, meaning you have an absolute duty to refrain from the act in any circumstances, regardless of the consequences (Johnson, sec. 5). If your maxim passes the third step but fails the fourth, then you have an imperfect duty, where you should refrain from the action in most cases, most of the time (Johnson, sec. 5). Only if the maxim passes every step, is it considered morally permissible, meaning it is something that is always okay to do. Kant’s theory of punishment is known as a retributivist theory. A retributivist theory of punishment is seen in contrast to a consequentialist theory of punishment, which would define as crime, only those actions which result in harm to the overall good of society. The punishment recommended for the crime, would be such that more overall good than suffering results from the punishment. In other words, the punishment should result in the greatest possible amount of deterrence, in exchange for the least amount of suffering imposed on the criminal, and the greatest chance of rehabilitation allowing for the punished to reenter as a productive member of society. A retributivist theory punishes based on desert. That is, you should be given the punishment you deserve. The retributivist believes that the consequences of an action should have nothing to with its status as a crime, and it should not be the goal of punishment to deter crime. The goal of punishment is simply to teach the criminal a lesson, by inflicting the same suffering on the criminal that he caused through his crime. Kant’s specific formulation of retributivism is based on two principles: the principle of equality and the principle of retaliation. The principle of equality rests on the idea that when someone commits a crime, they either gain an unfair advantage or harm someone else. Either the advantage one gains or the harm one causes through committing a crime needs to be balanced out. As Kant puts it, “the pointer of the scale of justice is made to incline no more to the one side than the other” (Kant, 104). In other words the criminal should not experience less suffering from his punishment than the person he inflicts harm upon, or suffer less of a setback than the advantage he gains from a crime. The effect of the punishment should be equal to the effect of the crime. The principle of retaliation states that the crime the person commits “is to be regarded as perpetrated on himself” (Kant, 104). Since the principle of equality states that the punishment and the crime need to be equal, there is no better way to satisfy that principle, than to use the crime itself as the punishment. If someone steals one hundred dollars, fine them one hundred dollars. If someone kills someone impose the death penalty. Using the crime as punishment achieves the exact effect necessary to following the principle of equality. Now that we have outlined Kant’s views in full, let us turn to the case of the unlicensed engineer and test their practical application. The case can be summarized as follows: Charles Landers, an unlicensed engineer, forged his licensed partner’s signature, and used his professional seal on 40 documents. The forged signatures were supposed to certify to the city’s health department that the septic systems met environmental and health regulations. Although none of the documents ended up having to be changed, Judge Wolverton removed Landers’ privileged to practice engineering for one year. He also sentenced him to 20 days in jail, 160 hours of community service, $4000 in fines, and a year of probation. He was also ordered to inform property owners about the forged documents, explain how he would solve the problem, and pay for a professional engineer to review, sign, and seal the documents. Lets apply Kant’s Categorical Imperative to this case. Consider a maxim dictating that I should commit forgery to satisfy my customer’s immediate demands so I can make money off of them. If I will conceive of a world where that maxim is made universal, I conceive of a world where everyone always deceives people to get what they want in any circumstance. In this world, it is never possible to believe what someone says or trust them, because anything someone says is a lie. In order to complete my maxim, which involves tricking people into believing I signed a document to get what I want, I must get people to believe it was me who signed the document. But in this world, it is never possible to believe someone. Thus, such a world is inconceivable, so you have a perfect duty to never commit forgery for personal gain. Interestingly, Judge Wolverton uses a similar analysis to declare Landers’ action as wrong. He remarks, “Our system would break down completely if the word of individuals could not be relied upon." In other words, a world where everyone is deceitful is impossible, because our entire system of communication would breakdown, so what Landers did was wrong regardless of whether his documents were later verified as unproblematic with regards to public health code. Landers’ lawyer takes the consequentialist approach arguing that although what Landers did was against the law, he did not do anything wrong in the moral sense of the word. After review by an engineer, it was found there was nothing wrong with the documents Landers forged, and so there was no risk to public health and safety. Since there were no negative consequences of the crime, he should be given the minimum punishment. The punishments discussed and issued at the trial fit in with both retributivist and consequentialist theories. Attorney General Dan Cooper recommended the maximum sentence, arguing, "The 40 repeated incidents make his offense the most serious within the misuse of an engineer’s seal." This recommendation has its basis in a retributivist theory of punishment, because he is recommending a punishment based on what he deserves according to the severity of the crime. Richard Armstrong, a chairman of the board that licenses engineers follows a consequentialist theory of punishment by pointing out the benefit punishing Landers has on deterring future offenders. He states, “The discovery of this case will cast a shadow of doubt on other engineering designed by properly licensed individuals”. Since this is a unique case in that a licensed engineer designed the engineering but an assistant forged documents, it sets a precedent for questioning engineering designed by licensed individuals, because someone else could always have forged the documents. Thus this case serves as deterrence to future crimes of the same nature. The actual punishment issued by the judge can be thought of as following a retributivist theory of punishment. Taking away his privilege to work as an engineer, and forcing him to go around admitting he committed forgery to the people he lied to, and making him hire an engineer to reevaluate the documents, provides a balancing effect, by evening out the damages caused by the crime. The second category of Kant’s theory, which involves punishing with the exact crime the person committed is tough to determine whether or not it is satisfied. You obviously cannot punish a forger by lying to them, so the prison sentence, community service, and fine seem like adequate retribution. I believe that Kant’s theory is the most effective that we have discussed for professional use. It is easy to apply quickly to any situation and you always arrive at a definite answer. This is opposed to utilitarnianism or consequentialism, which although is a good theory, requires weighing the pros and cons of all possible consequences. This can be a difficult and drawn out process, and is impossible to do perfectly, because you can never foresee all of the consequences. It is also superior to ethical egoism, which says you should always do what is best for yourself. As seen in the Landers case, doing what you think to have the best results for yourself does not always result in an ethical decision. Ethical egoism also is in specific violation of NSPE code. The code says to hold paramount the safety and welfare of the public, but egoism specifically says to hold paramount your own welfare. Moral relativism could hardly be thought of as a practical theory to apply to professional ethics. Ascribing to it basically eliminates morality, making your opinion of it correct. If you believe something opposite to the principals of the NSPE code, then both you and the code are correct and you are free to act, as you would like. However, it could be useful as a way of thinking about morality, helping you to tolerate opposing viewpoints. Divine command theory is also inadequate, because it is impossible to determine what God declares the rules to be. Nihilism could never be useful as a practical way of thinking about morality, because it states that morality does not even exist. Aristotle’s theory of virtue ethics is useful when considering how to live a good life. It helps you to develop character, strength and skills over a long period of time, to better yourself as a person. One who has always stayed true to Aristotle will have no problem following the NSPE rule that engineers should conduct themselves honorably, responsibly, ethically, and lawfully so as to enhance the honor, reputation, and usefulness of the profession. However, Aristotle’s theory is not useful for practical purposes, because it involves developing character traits over time, rather than making quick moral decisions. One problem with Kant’s theory though, is that ignoring the consequences of an action just to uphold your moral duty can sometimes be problematic. It especially can interfere with the first principle of NSPE code, dictating you should hold most important the safety and welfare of the public. There are certain actions that regardless of their dire effects on the welfare of the public Kant would say you couldn’t avoid. For instance, suppose you are dealing with a dangerous situation, that has to be kept secret from the public, or else mass panic and riots would ensue. Kant would maintain you cannot deceive people, and must tell them anyways. Despite its shortcomings, Kant’s theory remains the most useful for dealing with professional ethics. It offers a quick method of determining the morality of an action, and almost always results in a satisfactory answer. Works Cited Johnson, Robert, "Kants Moral Philosophy", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = . Duff, Antony, "Legal Punishment", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = . Kant, Immanuel. “Justice and Punishment.” Trans. W. Hastie. In Philosophical Perspectives on Punishment. Ed. Gertrude Ezorsky. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1972. 102-106. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Case 43: Unlicensed Engineer Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1586116-case-43-unlicensed-engineer
(Case 43: Unlicensed Engineer Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1586116-case-43-unlicensed-engineer.
“Case 43: Unlicensed Engineer Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1586116-case-43-unlicensed-engineer.
  • Cited: 1 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Kant and the Unlicensed Engineer

Building An Engineering Career

This essay "Building An Engineering Career" discusses how a career in engineering is what needs hard work from the very beginning of one's academic career.... hellip; One-to-one meetings are very necessary, especially with those employees who do not meet the performance needs of the company.... The owner must be able to clearly convey his objectives to the employees and should tell them to summarize what they have understood so as to know if they clearly get to comprehend his points of view....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Fire Strategy for the Proposed JB Firth Building

The principles in the code must enable the engineer to properly plan the fire safety framework.... This is our report of the analysis of the building plan of JB Firth Building along with the requested Fire Strategy. Fire safety in buildings and structures… nitially involves careful engineering which requires accuracy and scientific study for engineering application; this is aided with experience and judgement as in other engineering disciplines....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

An Unlicensed Engineer for Constructing Engineers

Though in the entire scenario there was no violation of standards except for the forgery and the misuse of the seal, the unlicensed engineer was still found guilty and charged in court for breach of public trust.... This essay explores the case where an unlicensed engineer for constructing engineers forged his partner's signature and used his seal on at least forty documents.... It is evidently clear from the discussion that Charles Landers, unlicensed engineer for constructing engineers forged his partner Henry Wilson's signature and used his professional seal on at least 40 documents....
3 Pages (750 words) Case Study

Starting a New Engineering Company

This essay "Starting a New Engineering Company" discusses not an easy task for an engineer how to start an engineering company especially if he has not yet gained enough experience about how to manage the firm resources and the workforce.... irst of all, the entrepreneur or an engineer who is starting a firm for the first time should have a clear idea in his mind about whether the firm will be able to meet the demands of the market.... The engineer should focus strongly upon the basic functionalities of the firm....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Being a Successful Engineer

"Being a Successful engineer" paper discusses the pre-requisites and tips to become a successful engineer.... In order to be a successful engineer there are some pre-requisites.... hellip; To be successful an engineer should know what qualities he needs to work independently and also in a team.... The more experience working on the field, the more is the worth of an engineer.... An experienced engineer may be made a supervisor, manager, or a technical expert administering a workforce, younger engineers, diploma holders, or technicians....
6 Pages (1500 words) Coursework

HR Planning at Qantas

The study primarily seeks to put forth the effectiveness of human resource planning in organizations and its effects in attaining employee loyalty and satisfaction.... Organizations have been increasingly focusing their attention towards improving employee relations within an HR… In the rapidly changing external environment firms have been focusing more on human strategies in order to remain competitive in the global market....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Whether Savannah Harbour Expansion Project Is Worth the Shot

The term paper "Whether Savannah Harbour Expansion Project Is Worth the Shot" discusses the possibilities of  the Savannah Harbor Deepening Project that is expected to be completed by 2014 and is expected to be achieved following the expansion of the Panama Canal.... hellip; Expansion of the Savannah Harbor will have numerous impacts on the aquatic organisms through reduction of the dissolved oxygen required for survival of the aquatic organisms, destruction of their habitats while others will be killed by the equipments used in the dredging....
15 Pages (3750 words) Term Paper

The Usefulness of Automated External Defibrillator

As a licensed professional engineer, anybody would expect Justin to be able to sign off on the design, let alone Mellissa who is not even an engineer herself.... It is Justin's moral obligation to prove that the licensing agency did not make a false decision by issuing him the license of a professional engineer which he can only achieve by developing the skills and gaining the knowledge it takes to be able to sign off on the design.... Justin has the ethical obligation to prove his status as a licensed professional engineer....
5 Pages (1250 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us