The Concept of Empiricism and Experience - Essay Example

Kant comes up with another theory of mind. Here, Kant vividly rejects limitations posed by Hume on human knowledge claiming that mathematics gives us more knowledge regarding the empirical world. He also says that knowledge of facts is along with the cause and effect relationship. The manner in which Kant circumvents the challenge by Hume is through coming up with new ways of embracing the workings of the mind. For this reason, Kant observes that the human mind transforms information from noumena by turning it into substantial phenomena to help the mind process pure concepts regarding understanding.

Copernicus adopted the alternative after seeing the impossibility of explaining the motion for heavenly bodies with reference to the supposition that such bodies moved across the earth as the immovable centre (Gupta 78). This also included the supposition of all components to go around the sun. For this reason, Kant supposed on the contrary other than supposing man into moving around objects. He considered himself as the centre where all other things moved around him. According to Kant, both empiricism and rationalism are wrong in claiming that human beings can possess all knowledge of things within themselves.

Further, rationalists go wrong in not trusting senses within the phenomenal world where senses form part of decision-making processes. Rationalists are in order are well within “innate ideas” even though not in sense of forms by Plato similar to the argument of the wax in Descartes. Hume is inaccurate as claims of self-concept are unsupported by senses (Lawhead 63). The experiencing self remains one of the pre-conditions in engaging such experiences (this way, Descartes was right). Kant adds that Hume was wrong in the perspective that the future resembles the past solely due to “habit and custom”.

This way, morality provides the crucial linkage to the phenomenal worlds and noumenal. Kant is for the opinion that if morality is acceptable, human freedom is apparent. Therefore, humankind is not a mere creature for the phenomenal world. It is agreeable with most observers in critical philosophy of the concerns of human knowledge. Kant claims that epistemology stops at critical philosophy. Kant suggests that metaphysics go through reformation on grounds of epistemology. He suggests that a proper understanding of the sources, as well as limits for human knowledge, raise metaphysical questions.

Therefore, while the mind thinks only in respect of causality, then humankind is aware of the prior experiences across all objects on a cause and effect basis (Gupta). It then follows that there is a possibility that such objects are of such a nature, which the human mind is not able to think hence the applicability of the so the principle of rationalism.