Evil and the Evidence for God - Assignment Example

The paper "Evil and the Evidence for God" is a wonderful example of an assignment on philosophy. Question 1 A good argument should be based on true premises. An argument with a false premise does not qualify as a good argument. It should convince people to accept a certain conclusion. The other concept of a good argument is that it should be valid. Question 2A valid argument is one that follows the logic to make conclusions.Question 3A sound argument is one in which all the premises are true.

In this case, a conclusion is made from the premises.Question 4Socrates was charged for failing to acknowledge the gods and misleading the youths to follow his path. He was sentenced to death by the court.Question 5Socrates’ followers viewed him as the wisest person because of the way he presented his arguments. He posed questions that none could answer.Question 6Socrates stipulates that death should not be feared as it is not evil. He believes that death is the migration of one’s soul to another place.

Question 7Socrates says that he cannot fail to practice philosophy as he wants to lead a good life. This is because at one point everyone will die. Therefore, the best thing to do is to live a good life. Question 8God is traditionally given three highest attributes: all-powerful (omnipotence), all-knowing (omniscience), and supremely good (Omni benevolence). This means that he knows everything and has the powers to do any kind of thing. He is a good and a perfect God.Question 9The design argument claims that the operations of the world are too complex and could not have come by chance; hence God exists.

Question 10William Paley argues that all human artifacts and the universe are all products of intelligent design. The designer is very powerful and must be God.Question 11Human artifacts come from intelligent design. Therefore, the fact that the universe resembles human artifacts means they have similar characteristics.Question 12The objection of Paley’s argument is that he does not prove that the creator is infinite and that the world is not perfectly designed. Paley replied by saying that he does not prove that God is certain, but is probable.

Question 13Richard Dawkin disputes teleological argument by claiming that nature was not designed. If it was designed, then who designed the designer? He claimed that nature came about by natural selection or evolution.Question 14Van Inwagen says that nature was not by chance, nature was not well designed, and the fundamentals of the universe are necessary. Question 15Van concludes that even if it is impossible to determine a true hypothesis, there must be something that accounts for the fine-tuning of nature.

Question 16The cosmological argument tries to prove that God exists because the universe was not always there. Therefore, there is an external force that brought forth the universe.Question 17The principle of sufficient reason stipulates that everything that happens has a cause.Question 18Aquinas claims that anything in motion is put into that motion by an external force. As such, there must be unmoved mover who put things in motion.Question 19Everything cannot be moved if nothing existed. Everything exists because something else existed.

Question 20The first cause of existence is God. He existed so he could cause the existence of the universe.Question 21Something exists because it is necessary. God is necessary to cause the existence of things. Question 22The main arguments against cosmology are the question of who created God, and that not everything that exists is caused by another.Question 23Paul Edwards argues that even if something must exist to cause another, this does not justify the existence of God. It only explains there is something strong.

Question 24Priori argument is one that bases its premises without experience, while posterior arguments are obtained from experience or observation. Question 25Priori proves that God’s exists and we do not have to experience to know that. On the other hand, posterior argues that God exists from experiential evidence.Question 26Ontological arguments support the priori proof on the existence of God. People do not have to have the experience to justify that God exists. Question 27Gaunilo criticizes Anselm by claiming that the concept on the existence of God cannot be conceived.

Question 28God is omniscient, omnipotent, perfectly good, and evil exists contradicts. Question 29There are two types of evils: the moral and natural evil.Question 30Evil is not a punishment as sometimes it occurs without the fault of human beingsQuestion 31Evil happens so that people can appreciate good things. Without evil, people would never learn to appreciate what they have.Question 32The free defense of evil asserts that there are some things that God cannot do without allowing evil to prevail.

Question 33If God was all-powerful, he would do anything he wants without necessarily imposing evil in the society.Question 34Hick distinguished Augustinian based on free will and Irenaean based on human development. He preferred Iranian theodicy.Question 35Human beings are in the process of developing.Question 36Hick believes that human beings are developing and learn through the experience of evil (Geivett 27).Question 37When people who believe in all omnipotent God are subjected to evil, they are likely to become worse.