ause of children as they are a shared responsibility and without children husband and wife do not share any big responsibilities, which weakens their bond instead of strengthening it. George makes another argument that to ground marriage laws on the moral judgment of heterosexual and monogamous marriages is correct. He argues that since law is considered as a teacher, if it remains silent or neutral regarding marriages, then people would misunderstand the true meaning and essence of marriage. “It may harm people who need the reinforcement of the broader culture so that they are not distracted and lose their ability to “see the true meaning of marriage”, argues George (647). I agree with George’s criticism about same-sex marriages when he states that it is a union of man and women instead of two men or two women. I believe that heterosexual spouses unite in marital sexual activity for the goal of reproducing children but this unity brings longevity to their spiritual happiness and strengthens their bonding for the rest of their lives. The goal of having children is not instrumental. This goal unites the two parents into such a bond that they find peace in being with each other, which is necessary to motivate them to make efforts for their children’s well-being. These children are not treated as ends in themselves because they are a source of spiritual and emotional strengthening of the bond between their heterosexual parents. This is not true in case of same-sex marriages because there is no emotional bond that needs to be strengthened- the bond that forms as a result of sexual intercourse, pregnancy and offspring. I also agree that if law does not restrict same-sex marriages or remains quiet, then such marriages will become very common resulting in destroying...
This essay talks about a sensitive issue of same-sex marriages. The debate between supporters and opponents of same-sex marriages has been around for a fairly long period of time. The earliest known gay rights organization is the Society for Human Rights in Chicago that was established in 1924 and launched the first gay rights movement. After that, the Mattachine Society was established in 1950. History reveals that a number of organizations and movements have been launched at state level which support gay rights which include ceremonial marriages, child adoption, domestic partnership registration on public record, domestic partnership affidavit given by employers to gay employees that defines the couple’s economic relationship, health care, insurance, lawsuits, and property.
An analysis of George’s criticisms reveals many facts that are agreeable to someone who wants the true definition of marriage to sustain. George claims that marriage is a bond between man and woman with the purpose of reproducing offspring and also of sharing responsibilities that tends to enhance mutual love and caring through sexual act and spiritual bond. He argues that legalization of same-sex marriages would deteriorate the society morally. Bolte, contrarily, argues that if marriage means bearing children, then the marriages of opposite-sex couples not bearing children are also not legal. She states many advantages of same-sex marriages, one of which is that this enables gays and lesbians to be accepted as normal individuals of the society.