You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Pages 3 (753 words)
Moral relativism is a philosophical theory that morality, principles, ethics are relative which are culturally dependent as well count on an individual’s choice. This morality is not absolute, it does not hold for all people at any place and it depends on time and situation too.
Moral relativism allows people to give their point of view in accordance what is right and wrong for an individual. It does not limits a person rather offers to make his/her own decision. A professor of Philosophy at Cambridge University, Simon Blackburn describes his own opinion regarding moral relativism "Different opinions, no one authority, and as many 'truths' as there are people or societies or cultures advancing different ways of doing things," According to moral relativism nothing is bad or good but it depends on the situation a person is going through and how he deals with it, it is an obvious truth which is irrefutable, but a controversy here arises as other sees it shattering the moral foundation. Moral relativism is more comprehensible when compared with moral absolutism. Absolutism is also a philosophical theory which states that morality is dependent on universal principles, which are natural laws and conscience and the power of doctrine principle is vested in one authority. Muslims and Christians believe in one God, his power is bestowed upon his people; he is the ultimate authority and ultimate source of common morality. But moral relativism on the contrary is based on the absolute standards and principle. ...
Not exactly what you need?