Kant's Miscarriage of All Philosophical Trials in Theodicy - Essay Example

Presentation on Kants essay ‘On the miscarriage of all philosophical trials in theodicy’ Presentation on Kants essay ‘On the miscarriage of all philosophical trials in theodicy’ Introduction Kant was a great philosopher who engaged most his works on philosophy of religion. Most of these works included arguments on God’s existence, the characteristics of Supernatural being the immortality of an individual, the question of sin, and the connection of ethical principles to faithful belief and custom (Firestone and Palmquist, 2006).

He was very much interested mainly in the theoretic position and purpose of the thought of God. Therefore, he sought to understand the notion of God in a methodically well-ordered group of basic theoretical values that provide an explanation of instruction and formation of the world. This paper presents a critique on the Miscarriage of All Philosophical Trials in Theodicy. What are the three attributes of God? In his essay, he starts by stating that the occurrence of sin on earth disrupts three main attributes of an almighty God.

Kent questions all efforts to think against the question of evil in the essay (Firestone and Palmquist, 2006). In this essay he looks at the holiness of God, secondly he looks at God’s goodness as a ruler, and God as judge. These are the major questions in this essay; What is the relationship between divine reason and human being wisdom? In the essay, he argued that the great intelligence could not be comprehended by an individual’s thought because he perceives it to be higher (Firestone and Palmquist, 2006).

According to him, he was right because an individual cannot comprehend supersensible objects within the environment (Firestone and Palmquist, 2006). From the essay, this cannot be said to be a justification (Firestone and Palmquist, 2006). Therefore, individuals cannot justify God, and they need to understand that thought cannot give accurate responses to God’s justifications. In the essay, there is nothing as counter-purposiveness, which are individual laws that violet human rights. An individual cannot stand for the truth he or she says (Firestone and Palmquist, 2006).

However, an individual must always stand for the truth of God’s holiness. It’s this holiness that guides an individual’s consciousness. What is the concept of evil? In his essay, he claims that a human being is only good so long as he or she stays away from sins and deception, or any form individual deception. He used this thought following individual consciences, because when one behaves without sin he, or she is a good individual (Firestone and Palmquist, 2006). This is challenging because it does no answer the question of holiness.

Kant only talks about an individual tendency to deception, and not an individual’s pure reason. Finally, Kant believed that there are people within the society that can be observed as having an irresistible personality fault that directs them to individual dishonesty. However, the essay does not state if this concept applies to everybody or just a few people within the society, and the presences of evil in world violet all the three attributes of God. The Devine wisdom cannot be understood using man’s way of reasoning.

Therefore, reasoning cannot answer the question of God’s wisdom. Reference Firestone, C., and Palmquist, S. (eds.) (2006). Kant and the New Philosophy of Religion. Notre Dame: Indiana University Press.