Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

The Ontological : Anselm, Kant, Descartes and a Touch of the Buddha - Thesis Example

Only on StudentShare
Author : fpacocha

Summary

This study shall discuss the thesis that God, being that than which no greater can be conceived, must exist, for if he did not then it would be possible to conceive of an existent God, which would be greater than that which no greater can be conceived, which is absurd…

Extract of sample
The Ontological : Anselm, Kant, Descartes and a Touch of the Buddha

From this research it is clear that ontology includes the fundamental questions of being, the basic properties of what and how and how much and why of anything classifiable. This ontological argument speaks of God as the most non-reducible example of primary being. The idea is that when being is reduced to its ground source, there is God, and that beyond that point of fully reduced concept of ultimate being can be nothing because to imagine beyond that point means we were never yet at that point, in reduction, in the first place, and to argue otherwise is without rational defense. Kant responds to Anselm’s ontological argument with the observation that it is based on a confusing assumption. If God exists, this is a property of the world in which God is manifest, and not a property of God, since existence is not a property. He explains, in Critique of Pure Reason:
Being is evidently not a real predicate, that is, a conception of something which is added to the conception of some other thing. It is merely the positing of a thing, or of certain determinations in it. Logically, it is merely the copula of a judgment…Now if I take the subject (God) with all its predicates (omnipotence being one), and say, God is, or There is a God, I add no new predicate to the conception of God, I merely posit or affirm the existence of the subject with all its predicates – I posit the object in relation to my conception (Kant).

...
Download paper

Related Essays

Ontological Arguments and Belief in God.
His argument, however, was wholly rejected by Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas’s suggestion was that there is no way that mere mortals can conceive what God’s nature is, and thus we surely cannot conceive God like Anselm has said we can (Oppy 122-3). Therefore, this argument can be used only by the ones who can understand the true essence of God and that cannot be anyone but God Himself. David Hume was another philosopher who went against Anselm’s argument. His criticism was that it has no evidential reasoning. His argument was that the existence of a being cannot be proved simply through a…
9 pages (2259 words)
Ontological argument - Rene Descartes
The researcher is determined to critically analyze Descartes’ Ontological Argument in the light of the doctrines articulated by Avicenna, St. Anselm and Nietzsche by the authors including Roger Ariew, John Hawthorne, John M. DePoe and Oppenheimer & Zalta. Since it is a basic research in nature and scope, the researcher will seek support from the material discussing the philosophy of the Medieval and Classical Eras, where the paper will examine the existence of Ontological Argument in ancient times and influence of the Descartes’ doctrine on the future philosophers. One of the most…
14 pages (3514 words)
general topic
Metaphysics is further categorized into two main sub branches of Cosmology, which studies the origin and nature of the universe, and Ontology, which studies the nature of being and existence. Within metaphysics there are a broad range of differing philosophical theories having dissenting opinions and expressing opposing views.

You may also like:
Microeconomics Research Paper Topics

10 pages (2510 words)
Ontological Argument criticism by Kant "Critique of Pure Reason"
Kant vehemently reaffirmed the intelligibility of the world as demonstrated by common sense and science. He has had immense influence in the world of philosophy and continues to be a great source of inspiration for all. Despite rejecting some of his core ideas, the subsequent generation that lived under German idealism has widely adopted his work. His prime objection was that existence is not a predicate. The foundation of the ontological argument was the existence of a God that is greater than a God who does not exist. Thus, the very foundation was baffling and questionable. Kant advocated…
5 pages (1255 words)
Government Business Relations
Regarding to this, the core purpose of this paper is to evaluate and understand the philosophical underpinning of different perspectives concerning knowledge and theory. As a matter of fact, there are number of paradigms which have been substituted in order to provide reasoning and conducting inquiry for a respective subject of matter. Careful consideration will be given to paradigms of inquiry including positivism, post positivism, critical theory and constructivism. Furthermore, the paper incorporates a framework outlining ontology, epistemology, methodology and methods along with…
9 pages (2259 words)
St. Anselm's Ontological Argument
That is, absolute cause of everything, which implies that God exists. Anselm at the beginning starts by explaining and rooting his ontology in the Christian understanding of God, in that He is “something beyond which nothing greater can be thought” (Pojman & Rea 139). In this regard, Anselm implies that Gods is the end in power, love, truth and other qualities beyond which nothing of better quality can be conceived. Anselm takes the reader through two steps: he explains and defines the basic qualities of God in relation to his divineness and explains the absolute necessity of God‘s…
4 pages (1004 words)
Critically evaluate both the ontological and epistemological assumptions which underpin one of the philosophical traditions disc
The paper closes with a snippet review of the criticisms to the theory and possible reactions to these criticisms. Ontology defines the nature of something while epistemology defines the knowledge of something. The epistemological basis of postmodernism demonstrated in this paper is evolutionary. One of the ontological standing of postmodernism elucidated in this paper is social constructivist. This ontological standing moves that the status of entities depends on their involvement or lack of involvement in discourse. It holds that it is only entities constructed or produced through discourse…
8 pages (2008 words)