You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Pages 4 (1004 words)
What arguments do Lucretius use against the claim about an afterlife? Irrefutably, since the time when humanity started to recognize its presence, the essence of existence after the physical one has turned to be a mystery.
What arguments do Lucretius use against the claim about an afterlife? Irrefutably, since the time when humanity started to recognize its presence, the essence of existence after the physical one has turned to be a mystery. In addition, he claimed that this chiefly has robed humanity the enjoyment one ought to have due to the fear of what would happen when out this globe’s existence. Lucretius argued that the issue of death to humanity is insignificance and the postulations, which the religions normally hold after its occurrence. This is because human is mortal and what has dissolved in its elements does not bear any sensation that would continue afterwards. According Epicureanism, materials that encompass humanity cannot have afterlife or any possibility of experiencing resurrection as contended by religion (SEP). He also contends that, when our existence ceases via separation of the body and soul, nothing will ever happen to us or rouses our feelings. The assertion is that, even if earth mixes with sea or sky for then humanity will be nonexistent. He also contended that, suppose there was the composition of the entities, which constituted us prior death, to which we are presently, it would not matter. Since, the former memory has undergone destruction or disruption where nobody is a composition of mind and soul after death. How does he understand the afterlife or immortality? Afterlife or immortality according Lucretius is nonexistent where people ought to live as happily and with the absence of any fear (Esolen 18). ...
Not exactly what you need?