Human perfection is thus a product of perfection of the intellect. The following paper discusses the just occasion of Socrates’ view that a morally good person is happier than the morally bad person. This will be followed by a personal philosophical worry related to his justification. DISCUSSION Socrates’ view of the relation between virtues and happiness is that good morals are necessary for the fulfillment of life happiness. He believed that an honest, fair, wise and self controlled individual will merit praise and respect from other people thus contributing to achievement of happiness. Portraying virtuous behaviors towards people does not guarantee moral reciprocity. In such a case, Socrates’ view makes one wonder whether nasty responses to virtuous deeds are an aspect of happiness. Consequently, morally potent people have a tendency of leading a life filled with fun and joyous experiences. In this perspective, happiness emanates from the belief that their actions are for the life betterment and satisfaction. Everything that brings satisfaction is an agent of happiness not unless one is missing out on the different forms of happiness. However, he counters this by suggesting that normal happiness makes one think that they are happy whereas real happiness stems deeply inside the soul. He portends, "The Olympian victor makes you think yourself happy; I make you be happy" (West 36-37). Socrates affirms that true happiness extends beyond external wealth and worldly possessions. He asserts, “Wealth does not bring about excellence, but excellence makes wealth and everything else pleasurable for men” (West 30). This implies that it is impossible for one to buy perfect happiness through material possessions. Socrates views virtue and soul as a means to a healthy and flourishing after life and the evil tendencies associated with an individual have the ability to destroy the soul leading to future unhappiness. He believes in the existence of a higher power that rewards and punishes good and bad deeds in the after life. This rhymes with his affirmation that morally upright individuals will lead a happy life both currently and in the after life. Amid his belief in the existence of the after life, Socrates does not believe in any sacred scripture or religious myths (Leibowitz). The lack of credible proves of the existence such an after life after death compromises the logic that individuals abiding to the moral virtues will experience a happy after life. Does this means that one has to endure painful experiences that may be associated with maintenance of virtuous principles to deny he or herself satisfaction in the current life for an after life? According to Socrates, wisdom is the centrally significant aspect of happiness. He maintained, “The unexamined life is not worth living” (West, 38). Evil, people lack an aspect of reflection in the way they lead their life thus wasting the capacity of critical thinking that enables one choose between vices and virtues. They only indulge in those activities that please their body without an analysis of the far reaching effects of their actions. Virtues cannot be developed without wisdom implying that virtuous individuals stand a better chance of cultivating long lasting happiness than evil people. Moreover, wisdom is required for an individual to know whether what they are pursuing in their life will
Name Professor Module Date Socrates, Are You Happy? The goodness of a person is contained in their operation and behavior. A moral person reasons and behaves well. Happiness is an activity rooted in the human choice, which is not inherent. Human happiness is dependent on the agility in which they perfect their human powers…
While by human nature, there is sufficient basis to justify Freud’s proposition that human beings are governed by the ‘pleasure principle’ which apparently receives satisfaction through the instincts, a man who is sincerely cautious to avoid temptations and maintain reverence for wisdom would advance to a level that enables him to take control or even break being further governed by pleasure.
As human beings, materialism is our weakness. We fall for things, for power, money and authority. At different stages in life, we want different things. We derive pleasure from different kinds of activities and want to attain different kinds of things.
This appears as quite a subjective opinion due to the lack of consideration of the problems and headaches children bring to their parents’ lives. Hence, a debate arises as to the role of children in being the bundle of joys they are known to be to their parents.
As such, his accusers are numerous and his crimes or counts of evil doing span a long time, in which case his accusers being many do not give him an objective approach to his defense in that he cannot mention them by name and listen to them on one to one basis in order to reply to their allegations.
He also argued that sans laws, he would not be who he was. Laws, in other words, had an authority of a paternal nature over him. He also decided that he had an implied contract with Athens. Finally, he also argued that staying in prison was better since he could not find any happiness easily in any other part of Greece.
The company pride itself for selecting widest variety of brands in its shop that has been collected from throughout the globe. Furthermore, it has been encountered that Happy Wine operates nearly about three wine as well as spirit stores all over Miami. The company inculcates a successful track record with respect to its wine delivery or sales.
The study reflects the differentiated training program being designed for the managers. The training design incorporates within it different modules such as on-the-job and off-the-job training for the hierarchy level, along with task needs assessment and individual needs assessment.
Do you agree with Mill? Explain.
Mill distinguishes between act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. His original theory, based on act utilitarianism, judges the act and whether the result of the act is good or bad. In his modified approach of rule