You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Pages 3 (753 words)
Name Institution Tutor Subject Code Date of submission Philosophy Essay: Sentientism Singer argues that we should extend to the sentient beings an equal moral consideration that we extend to human beings. By his argument, Singer implies that we might consider sentience by the ability of a being to experience effects like pleasure and pain is reasonable enough principle of moral importance.
Therefore, we can not probably think that intelligence is an appropriate decisive factor for moral consideration. Singer also argues that it is just by the good quality of something being sentient that people can say it has interests by any means, hence this makes sentience fall in a different category than the other principle. Singer is simply trying to ascertain that if a creature is not sentient, then the idea of showing it moral consideration does not make any sense. This off-putting argument is significant since Singer has a tendency of ending up leaving out humans who are no longer sentient for instance those in a coma. He is comfortable accepting the satisfied to accept that outcome, but it is significant that he explains why the leaving out of some humans by his principle is not difficult since he has disapproved of other principles for their exclusion as this is his target. Nevertheless, ascertaining that beings that are not sentient are not worth moral consideration does not get enough illustration that the sentient beings are not worth moral consideration. He does not give much argument for his final claim however; he appears to have the same justification in his mind. ...
Not exactly what you need?