Some of the constutuents that measure living standards include the per capita, age of people and life expentancy among others. There is the fear of the gap widening more in the years to come if no action has taken place to curb this problem. Inequality is massive in the decision making of policies in the international political and in financial insititutions.John Rawl explains this in his theory on global liberties. They exist in form of both global economic and political basis. “There is uneven distribution of resources in the world” (Pogge, p34, par 3); hence, causing inequality in the living standards. Discrimination is another factor that leads to inequality especially when the poor people are discriminated in relation to their economic status the society. Many peole are dying in East Bengal due to lack of food, medical care among other basic needs. This shows how much inequality has affected the world today. It is possible to evade poverty among such poeple through applying several policies. This paper will focuss on the effects of global justice and the increasing cases of global poverty. It also analyzes possible solutions to this problem so to achive lower levels of poverty cases if any. The issue of double standards has also been addressed in this paper. However, double standards is not justified whatever the situation. Global justice has become an issue in political philosophy arising from the unjust state of the world today (Pogge, 2007, p345). Thinking about global justice in the world today involves a double standard. This involves two broad parties to achieve global justice. The first party is at the individual level while the second is the government level. Teh context of global justice is the impartiality that bhas been created in the world today. This is because people believe that their duties to family members, friends and their personal issues are more important than those of strangers. This makes them less concerned about issues of people who appear to be strangers to them. The government also contributes to the state of glodal injustice through the various policies they make for their cirtizens. This is because they make policies with their citizens in mind only, not considering those of other countries. “This has also led to some of the conflicts existing between some states” (Schaefer , p23 par4). Global justice is the main cause of global security because injustice causes certain feelings in people like anger and humiliation. These feelings cause violence among societies in the quest for justice. For instance, the poor feel that the wealthy people in the society are the cause of their poverty. Such feelings trigger violence and in long run lead to wars in the world. Philosophers have tried coming up with theories to solv ethe problem of global injustice in the world today. An example of such a philosopher is John Rawl. He explains how to achieve justice in the world both on the basis of economic status and political inequalities. Morality is also another factor to consider when seeking to ensure justice (Pogge 2007, p34). This is because it is morally upright to ensure equality in the society. Some theories term injustice and inequality in the socity as an immoral act. However, the theory of Rawl explains clearly on how to curb the problem of injustice in the world by avoiding discrimination. He explains that making decisions should not be on the basis of teh economic status of a person. It ensures that
Global Justice and Global Poverty Name Global Justice and Global Poverty The world today is full of inequalities in the developed society. This inequalities is very evident in the state of the standards of living among different peole in the same society…
Great inequalities are observable between different people within each society, and between societies as a whole, and yet most people would agree that it is a good thing for governments, corporations, international agencies and individuals to strive towards social justice.
(Sen) Poverty is also taken as deprivation and disparity. The relative extents of social affluence define disparity in any society. Psychologically poverty can be defined in a number of different ways but this paper will be limited to addressing poverty through an individual and global perspective.
The current trend of the world economics is such that the poor are getting poorer and the rich are getting richer. This trend has been on the increase and has reached to a level where the number of people living below the poverty line has increased at a staggering rate.
Moral obligations are embedded in these relationships’ voluntary nature. However, there is a lot of subjectivity, debate, and difference of opinions when it comes to moral obligations of a richer nation toward a poorer nation across countries. Nations become rich by adopting ways that benefit them socially and economically.
The author states that if a claim is made for the future generations, then it will be possible to take away from the current world order, which has certainly been responsible for much of the earth’s environmental damage, the power to continue doing what it is currently doing so that there might be a break from the environmental degradation.
Based on these foundations, nations sought to fight to keep their interests and protect their desires and expectations. The division of the modern nations in the early 1900s laid the foundations for the most extensive and most destructive wars in history – the two World Wars.
While inclusive education is a concept which generally means the education of all the children in mainstream schools irrespective of any consideration, it has been comprehended differently in different nations. Though the process of inclusive education has been implemented in some nations, it is immensely affected by the diversity in the understanding.
Illiteracy or low education affects the ability to get jobs and to access information that could improve the quality of lives. Poor health, malnutrition and lack of good healthcare further limit the underprivileged from the prospects for work and from realizing their
Democracy implies that every citizen has a right to equality. Income inequality creates hatred, political volatility, and erosion of the authenticity of democratic organizations. It leads to political divisions. This makes it tough for
The historically accepted Hobbes document, Social Contract, affirms that justice is based on compliance with the social contract. The Social Contract document is the brainchild of Thomas Hobbes. The document affirms that a person who did not sign or enter into any contract is not bound by the contract.
4 pages (1000 words)Essay
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you an essay for FREE
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org