Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Pick a stance on the rights of animals based on Peter Singer's article Famine" - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
College
Author : bell55
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 4 (1004 words)

Summary

Peter Singer and the Morality of Animal Rights This paper will look at Peter Singer’s moral equivalence argument in support of animal rights and draws from his article entitled “Famine, Affluence and Morality1” – demonstrating how the moral prescription underlined in his seminal work also make the case for the inescapability of human rights…

Extract of sample
Pick a stance on the rights of animals based on Peter Singer's article Famine"

The concept that we try to use to extract an argument for animal rights is the concept introduced by Singer that proximity does not matter. Whilst in this particular case, the proximity spoken of was geographic, .i.e., small child in neighbor’s house vis a vis a Bengali child, the proximity could also be in terms of species. In the logic of Peter Singer, animals cannot be denied rights given humans even if they are proximally different from the latter. Animal rights can find justification in theories of right that are embedded in time. It is interesting to begin this exposition by looking at the fairly recent debate between Singer and Judge Richard Posner of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. At the heart of the debate was a statement made by Posner, that “human beings prefer their own. ...
Download paper

Related Essays

Logics - Analysis of an Article by Peter Kreeft
Apart from many articles, he has written many books such as The Snakebite Letters, The Philosophy of Jesus, The Journey: A Spiritual Roadmap for Modern Pilgrims, Prayer: The Great Conversation: Straight Answers to Tough Questions About Prayer etc. The major idea behind this article “The Apple Argument Against Abortion” is to educate people about the consequences of performing abortion. Peter Kreeft argues against abortion in a philosophical manner throughout this article. He is making in depth analysis of the abortion issue with the help of answering certain questions like Who human are,…
6 pages (1506 words)
Famine Affluence and Morality
people living there. It comes to Singer’s attention that while most of the population in Bangladesh, many countries and people around the world have more than enough of wealth to manage. Singer then comes up with the solution that the people with wealth beyond their means should be morally obliged to give up a portion of their material belongings and give them to other people whose lives are caught up in extreme poverty. This does not mean that the wealthy will lose a significant portion of wealth, but only the amount in which that is too excessive for them to keep or manage. Despite the…
4 pages (1004 words)
Famine, Affluence, and Morality
We should according to peter be ashamed of our self and we should be guilty for our decision not to help those in the refugees’ camps, who are dying of hunger and due to lack of shelter and medication (Singer, 1972). According to him it should be good to help them and also not good not to help them. People who then don’t contribute toward assisting the unfortunate in the society should be condemned. Singer is actually right that we have an obligation to help minimize world hunger. This is because those trapped in such situations is not by their own making. Those in Bengal if we don’t…
3 pages (753 words)
Analogy, Marginality and Action. Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” Analysis.
In the fifth paragraph, Singer emphasized that helping starving people is a moral obligation by people, but granted that it does not sacrifice anything that is “comparably” important. For instance, if by donating a hundred dollars in a foundation that feeds starving children and families in Africa would cost the life of your child who also needs the money for her operation, then one will be spared of guilt by keeping the money for his child’s operation instead. In other words, if a person acknowledges he or she can feed a single family in Africa by donating his money allotted for a fancy…
4 pages (1004 words)
Moral Obligations To The Poor In The Article by Peter Singer.
According to him, it is essential that human beings bring about a change in their moral conceptual scheme, i.e. the way they perceive moral issues and the commonly accepted way of life. As he remarks, it is commonly accepted at the international level that suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are not good. In this background, Singer’s argument has great relevance in wider perspective, i.e. we have moral liability to prevent something bad from happening if it is in our power to do so. Therefore, it is indubitable that Singer’s article “Famine, Affluence, and…
3 pages (753 words)
Singer's Practical Ethics
He is strong in his convictions about the utilitarian ethics. He argues, “As far as my underlying ethical views are concerned, some of my friends and colleagues will no doubt be distressed to find the countless hours spent discussing these matters with me that have served only to reinforce my conviction, that consequentialist approach to ethics….is fundamentally sound” (x). The society impacted by the materialist civilization, industrial and internet revolutions is, to some extent, responsible for the present day maladies afflicting the society, according to him and the basic values of…
6 pages (1506 words)
Crisis Of Famine In Bengal. Peter Singer's Views On Our Duties Of Foreign Aid And Charity.
Peter puts these arguments forward by way of two principles; one of them proposes the extent to which death and suffering is bad irrespective of the cause, which ranges hunger, deficient housing and inadequate. Secondly, he argues that one is obligated to mitigate morally bad state of affairs if they are able to do that without having to sacrifice that with another with the same moral importance (Singer, 1972). In his argument, Singer proclaims that it is only moral to help those in need with disregard to causing the same impact on the people. The three counter-arguments given by Peter…