Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Government (social contract theory and redistribution of wealth). Chose one of them - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Pages 4 (1004 words)


Name Professor Class Date I. Argue for or against the social contract theory Hobbes There are two philosophers who wrote about social contract theory that I will argue for and against. They are Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. I will argue against the claim of Hobbes that human life, by default, is anarchaic and is characterized by misery and chaos…

Extract of sample
Government (social contract theory and redistribution of wealth). Chose one of them

I am more inclined to believe that man by default is good and influenced by his or her environment where he can be better or slide into misery, as Hobbes argues. Misery and chaos are not the natural conditions of man but, rather, the blank state or tabulasa rasa subject to the condition and influence of the society, environment and government. Hobbes’ argument about the basis of government is also flawed, as per the statement that government is formed by its citizens’ giving up some of its destructive rights to have a government. While it may be partially correct that people must cede or limit some of their freedoms to achieve order, it does not necessarily mean giving up their freedom. Simply, government was not created on the basis of men agreeing not to kill or rob each other; rather because it is better for them if there is a government to set the direction of what the ideal behavior in society is and to protect their rights and freedom. Locke Locke agreed with Hobbes in the fundamental need for a government. They, however, differ in the reason and principle for forming such government. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Social Contract Theory by John Rawls
Social contract theory gives a suggestion of a simple first step in assessing the ethical values that human beings can use to build a just society (Freeman 44). In this case, it elaborates that, people should assume that they do not know their race, age, wealth, intelligence, and gender among other things. This paper will seek to explain, evaluate, and describe the important features of the social…
3 pages (753 words)
Social Contract Theory
Hobbes’ views of the theory were laid down against the backdrop of the Civil War in 1665 in his magnum opus, ‘Leviathan’ meaning sea monster. This paper focuses however on the moral aspect of law that human beings living together are supposed to obey and how far this obligation extends with respect to other people and their rights. Furthermore, if there were a law in place, then would…
5 pages (1255 words)
social contract theory
Hobbes explains the social contract as a mutual agreement among the members of society to observe some rules of conduct and give up some freedom for the well being of the society. This paper seeks to explain the relationship between the social contract and the duty to obey laws. Whether we have the moral obligation to obey laws or not has remained a question of contention in the field of…
5 pages (1255 words)
topic essay about Social Contract Theory
The same individual can also freely dance until he or she is too tired to continue dancing. However, the above person must comply with the United States laws to avoid causing discomfort among the other members of the community. The law prohibits the person from using a microphone to sing at a very loud boisterous level. The act would irritate the nearby apartment dwellers’ sleeping patterns.…
4 pages (1004 words)
In this paper, I argue that our government ought not redistribute wealth.
Governments will normally utilize two types of methods to redistribute wealth. These are the use of vouchers, for instance, food stamps, and the use of subsidies (Hochschild 13). These programs that aim at transfering payment can be funded through such initiatives such as general taxation, which has a disproportionate benefit for those in poverty and others who are expected to pay fewer taxes.…
4 pages (1004 words)
chose one argument and write about it
The second premise is that leaders are irrevocably oppressive since even when they make mistakes in judgment that would be seen to have the opposite effect of advantaging the weak; they are not technically leaders since as a craftsman a leader is infallible therefore when they err they are not actually leaders. He therefore contends that as the case is in all cities, it is considered just to obey…
4 pages (1004 words)
chose one argument and write about it
The happiness, however, is subject to fall. This makes the second premise of the argument where Aristotle proclaims that, in the event that the noble happiness disappears, the recovery is a challenge. Happiness, therefore, is a strong virtue that needs consistent and careful observation to limit change to extreme conditions. The authority of academic minds reveals various dilutions that attempt to…
5 pages (1255 words)