The Pros of Welfare and Charity

The Pros of Welfare and Charity Essay example
High school
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 3 (753 words)
Download 0
Complete Name of Student Complete Name of Professor Subject Description 4 March 2013 The Pros of Welfare and Charity Welfare programs and charitable works are intended to provide aid to those who are most helpless and poorest. Oftentimes, assistance is made available to individuals who are incapable due to a variety of reasons: illness, old age, physical and mental disabilities among others…

Introduction

Public funds and charities are not meant to teach individuals to become indolent and overly reliant on donations and government assistance; the kind of support that they receive from both NPOs and the government can be utilized and taken advantage in several ways such as in financing education and establishing their own business. So, there is more valid reason as to why there is a need for us to dig deeper in the pros of welfare and charities in every society at large. The Pros of Welfare Welfare generally refers to the providing of a minimum cost of security and social support for individuals belonging in a certain country. Social welfare, in particular, specifically points toward the promotion of common good and general welfare for the people such as “bring about civic betterments and social improvements” (Internal Revenue Service, “Social Welfare”). In highly developed countries such as the United States, welfare is mostly provided by the government, along with charitable organizations, non-governmental organizations, religious associations, and inter-governmental organizations. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Philosophy assignment
The money provided to them was to suffice as their livelihood, and otherwise they were also provided with relief in kind, i.e, in terms of clothes and food. Indoor relief on the other hand was established so that the legislation took control of the plight of the poor and the old people. They were provided with shelter, clothing as well as hospital and medical facilities if they required them. The…
Famine Affluence and Morality
people living there. It comes to Singer’s attention that while most of the population in Bangladesh, many countries and people around the world have more than enough of wealth to manage. Singer then comes up with the solution that the people with wealth beyond their means should be morally obliged to give up a portion of their material belongings and give them to other people whose lives are…
Capitalism vs. Welfare State: A Debate
On the other hand, there is the welfare state, where the government takes a direct hand in providing crucial services to its people, whenever they need it. For example, the government directly gets involved in the provision of food, shelter, and money so in order to promote the living standards of its people (Dore 115). A social welfare state promotes the idea that the public has a responsibility…
Cons on ethical issue
Basically, they represent and act in response to the larger social arrangement and its distribution of labor. Who is answerable to the deteriorating condition of the weather, climate change, juvenile delinquency, the swelling number of out-of-school youth, and many other dilemmas that many societies are suffering today? Our increasing incapacity to determine and link the cause and effect in the…
All forms of government welfare should be abolished.
Moreover, most of government welfare initiatives fail the test of providing long-term solutions to economic challenges facing society, thus encourage a persistent culture of reliance on others and loss of productivity. 3. What is your position regarding the topic? My position is that government welfare programs should be abolished. 4. What “evidence” have you offered to support your…
All forms of government welfare should be abolished.
So many at this point might argue that it is unfair to deprive those people who are in need and do not have their own resources to do so. But the problem with carrying on these aids is that it has paralyzed the people. Since easy money is earned through these welfare programs there are many people here who are not willing to even work a day for their bread and butter. Hence it is justified that…
Crisis Of Famine In Bengal. Peter Singer's Views On Our Duties Of Foreign Aid And Charity.
Peter puts these arguments forward by way of two principles; one of them proposes the extent to which death and suffering is bad irrespective of the cause, which ranges hunger, deficient housing and inadequate. Secondly, he argues that one is obligated to mitigate morally bad state of affairs if they are able to do that without having to sacrifice that with another with the same moral importance…