Some People claim that moral life is based on personal feelings and individual decisions; others prefer to reduce morality to laws and commandments. Firstly, we should figure out what ‘moral’ really means; so basically moral refers to a person’s sense of right and wrong…
It speaks of three things, moral standards, moral responsibility and moral identity. (Design. Morality 2013) When we claim that we want to lead a moral life, it means that we want to lead a life which embodies our own moral commitments. When the person has a good conscience which is socialized by human contact, then the person automatically starts leading a good moral life. A moral person would always do the right thing for the reason without thinking of any laws or commandments. It is true that laws and commandments enforce morality on people making them lead a forced moral life, for instance, if the law forbids killing and a person still wants to do that despite knowing its wrong, then that person is not moral by being. More importantly, these laws and commandments are at times not even same in all parts of the world. Having said that, in a few countries of the world there are not enough laws related to all the wrong activities, so considering that if morality and moral life is reduced to just laws and commandments, then the people living in those countries where they are not enough laws will less likely be able to lead a moral life. Morality of a person should always come from within; it depends on the conscience of a person. If a person’s conscience doesn’t find killing or stealing a wrong deed then that person’s conscience is formed poorly and hence his moral judgments wouldn’t be trustworthy either. A good conscience also plays a major role in leading a moral life. Morality has an impact on our daily decisions and these decisions are directed by our conscience. We shall figure out from where this conscience really originates from. Some people think that conscience is just a matter of our hearts and that the concepts of right and wrong are programmed in each of us The general ability of knowing what is right and wrong including the concrete judgments that humans make regarding what should or should not be done is all represented by conscience. To follow or depart from reason and the divine law are the decisions which moral choices confront us with; so a good conscience is what make makes judgments confirming to the reason. It is rightly said then that, a good conscience requires a lifelong formation as once it is developed properly, there is no way the person with good conscience will not lead a good moral life based on personal decisions. A moral life which will inspire others and they would follow the same path too. All said and done, a moral person would always do the right thing for the reason without thinking of any laws or commandments. A moral character would neither act out of fear nor hope for any reward. So many people who are bind to follow the law are not leading a moral life but they are just ‘pretending’ to be moral because a moral person is ‘moral’ in being not in behavior. So personal feelings seem to play a bigger role and have a greater impact in the attempt to lead a moral life than laws and commandments. As only when a person feels from within about the god and the bad then only can that person strive to lead a better life, a moral life without any forced rules enforced on him. This is how we can lead a moral life based on our personal decisions, by imagining the right way of conducting our lives; by caring for others when they are in trouble in a way which makes us feel that we are doing well in this world. The first step to seek a good moral life is to develop a good ...
Cite this document
(“Moral Life Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/90428-moral-life
(Moral Life Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Moral Life Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/90428-moral-life.
He has explained in detail that how these decent families struggle hard to attain standardized life style. Such groups are observed as hardworking and very much focused on their independence. In addition, decent families have been seen more cautious about their moral and ethical values as compare to street families.
This is emphasized by Kantian morality.
Immanuel Kant left behind a system of ethical philosophy, according to which an action which is both an end in itself and motivated by categorical imperative is the foundation of moral philosophy if moved by free elective will.
Examples of hypothetical and real situations will be used to illustrate personal understanding and interpretation. The contention is that this theory can only work positively in business decisions if all parties concerned operate from the same rational basis, with similar moral values.
Oscar Wilde, in The Importance of Being Earnest and William Shakespeare, in Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, venture into nature of society and how it effects the individuals within that society. Shakespeare and Wilde assert that deception is a symptom of a corrupt society not a character flaw.
In this paper, I intend to focus on comparing and contrasting my thoughts about the good life with the notions postulated by the great philosophers - Plato, Aristotle, Bentham, Mills, Kant and Rawls. Moreover, I aim to impart how these remarkable men and their respective schools of thought have reshaped my perception o how one lives the good life.
hrough an analysis of the content, the reader may notice that the tale’s implication lies in discovering the sense of Goodman Brown’s encounter in the woods.
The story started with Goodman Brown leaving his wife, Faith for an overnight chore. She begs him not to go, but
So, the ethics in me too has been undergoing the influence of both. In other words, the gene in me and the society around me both had an impact on my behavior and my ethics. Genetics made me possess certain innate qualities that I find difficult to
Morality issues as a central theme of Confucianism. Either an individual or society conceives morality as a set of codes of conduct that are acceptable. Morality refers to a code of conduct that all rational individuals within a group or society would support. The traditional Confucian morality is highly concerned with how individuals ought to live.
John Locke and Aristotle both focused their attention on how humans coped in a free state of nature, contrary to a structured society. They also explored how government was formed and the purpose that such governments served on behalf of the people. Further, Locke and Aristotle had a common interest in terms of advocating for the equality of people.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Moral Life for FREE!