Impacts of the Political Movements Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street - Term Paper Example

The paper “Impacts of the Political Movements - Tea Party and Occupying Wall Street" is a sapid example of a term paper on politics. The Tea party is a political movement engaged in protesting against the size and power of the government, increasing of taxes and federal spending. The focus of the movement is on how the government obtains revenue and spends it. It began in 2009, sponsoring protests and supporting political candidates and opposing taxation at varying degree. Occupy Wall Street is a movement targeting the financial aspect of the economy which includes; campaign for taxation of the rich through the enactment of fair taxation act, urging for financial reform to reduce monopoly and control by large businesses and campaign for the arrest and prosecution of bank executives responsible for the occurrence of financial crisis.

Occupy Wall Street began on the 17th of September 2011 at Zuccotti park with the main goal of protesting against social and economic inequality. Message coherence The Tea party movement message is focused on government actions in relation to taxes and expenditure. It protects against the increment of taxes, government spending, and the size and power of the government. According to O’Hara, the problem that the Tea party tries to address is the abandoning of the principles and the people by the politicians leading to the problems encountered today (OHara M John 21).

Occupy Wall Street is dealing with almost the same issue but under a different perspective. It deals with taking actions against banking institutions involved in the financial crisis witnessed in 2007 to 2009. Furthermore, the movement wants a review on the taxation in a bid to solve the social and economic inequality. Impacts of the movements Tea party movement is a conservative movement as such it has engaged in support of the Republican Party, presidential candidates. The effect of support is downgrading of the Democratic Party popularity thus affecting the poll outcome in a significant way.

Occupy Wall Street does not engage in politic directly because it des to support any party. In fact, it is engaging in the fight against inequality. The emphasis on the fight against equality has created a belief that a small government can not address the issue articulately, leading to a pull out of its supporters away from the Republican Party. Structure and tactics The movement employs a similar strategy in expressing their view of the government. The difference is that occupy Wall Street is a grass-root movement without sponsorship but funded by people around the world, while the Tea party receives funding through corporate sponsorship.

Because of the difference in funding, Occupy Wall Street demands less corporate influence over the government while tea party wants less government influence over corporations. The Tea party has a hierarchy structure while occupy Wall Street does not have any formal organization structure. The occupy Wall Street protestors are unarmed while those of the Tea Party are armed. Conclusion The movements in principle target an aspect of inequality but under different approach. While occupying Wall Street focuses on social and economic equity, Tea Party focuses on government spending and tax reduction.

The organization structure of the two movements varies significantly with tea party having a defined organization structure while Occupy Wall Street has an undefined organizational structure. The scope of influence is varying with the Tea party having a higher scope of influence due to the sponsorship and level of organization. Despite the difference in spheres of influence, the ideology of the movements agrees in a small degree with both protests being against the government for the occurrence of certain issues such as an increase in taxes and effect of the financial crisis.

Therefore, there are several similarities and difference between the two movements.