The Game Theory - Essay Example

THE ALLIES The Game Theory Introduction The interests of the American s and the Israel have a lot of commonalities. Different strategies remained applied by the two states to eliminate the enemies having several common enemies. The Israel state applied the game theory by transmitting and deceiving the American states around fixed intelligence with a predetermined goal. The strategy worked, and it provoked the US into bombing Libya results to one less common enemy that the two states have. The game theory, therefore, involved most of the other states, which took part in the bombing even though they had not believed in the deception message the Israel state produced. The role of the Israeli state in the terroristic acts of the other members of its axis stood based on sympathy and a complete mindset prepared long beforehand. The mind preset based on the removal of Saddam Hussein in order to secure the realm, which in this hand remains as the state of Israel1. With the clean break strategy in motion for securing the realm all the members of the axis focused their attention, finances and power on removing Saddam Hussein from power. The strategic importance only being the state of Israel objectively and in its right. In a way, the two states supported each other because the assistance remained significant in the state of Israel in the American state2. In its support, the United States of America needed the win in order that the Israeli state remains secure. Officially the Iraq state invasion stood to protect the Israel long before the 9/11 attack on America. Therefore, the reason the Americans took on Iraq is due to the threat to their nation and Israel as well. The Israel state had a strategy in the nineteen eighties; the plan had two premises of essentialities. One premise that remained indispensable stood as the Israel state needed to tap the imperial regional power in the Middle East. With Saddam Hussein in the way the Israel state needed improvisation to get rid of Saddam now that Saddam had a nuclear reactor. The nuclear reactor posed a possible fatal threat and with it Saddam had a lot of imperial strengths that could overpower Israel if used against it3. Therefore, in order for Israel to overpower Iraq it needed to overpower it but indirectly. Therefore, America posed the best characteristics and motive to eliminate Iraq`s power and possible future threat. In doing that Israel took over the regional power without being offensive about it. The second premise involved divide and conquer the Iraq state. Dividing Iraq had the potential to dissolute the Arab states into tribe controlled smaller states that had possible conflicts between them. The reason for the divide and conquer stood such that Israel had eyes and ears in the state for a source of moral legitimation4. In the dissolution of Iraq started another thread In the Arab society where all the other Arab states followed suit and started a civil war between themselves. In the process, the situation elevates and fuels the Iranian-Iraqi war and encourage polarization in the two states. In the process, the Israel nation gave the American state the incentive it needed as support whenever the American state needed it. After the 9/11 sympathetic nations had offered support to the United States, it remained impeccable that every nation had to make a decision just as President Bush had stated. The decision stood out as allegiance to the United States or allegiance to the terrorists. In the process, a lot of countries supported the United States that led a coalition forces. Some of the Arab states played a great role in the coalition forces against Iraq. Fighting Iraq remained the incentive for the axis one. All the members of that axis supported the overthrowing of Iraq tyrant Saddam Hussein5. What stands between the members of the first axis remains when one of the member states fights for more power over the other member states. In the process of one member state running for more power than the rest of the member states conflict stands bound to the action and splitting of allies among the contesting nations. A possible scenario relates to the stocking of weapons of mass murder between states in the first axis. Another cause stands to threats to the rest of the first axis states. In this scenario, if any, of the states, pose a threat, then it remains possible that, the states could stand divided. Allies of the United States in the Middle East support the United States because their interest remained the same for a long time to change the leadership of Iraq. Others believe that other than securing the realm, the United States planned to import oil from the Middle East. In the process of doing this possibly the American State plans to weaken the Arab domination of oil export. The uniting manifestation, causes and prospects of the second axis remain that they do not support the actions of the United States; China did not support the means the United States used in the Afghanistan. The means of torture and torture itself remains a subject that China did not support its use. The nations of the East: China, Russia and Iran allied themselves. Russia does not accept the order of the world led by the United States of America and its allies. China, on the other hand, is a force to reckon with as it challenges the world leading nations with its demand for more power in international affairs. With its large economy and sustainable economic growth and pushing back in the United States military in Asia. A Sino-Russian alliance acts as the counterweight to the United States power in transatlantic alliances. Resulting in conflicts in Ukraine, Moscow and Beijing have embraced each other to underscore fundamental weaknesses that have led countries neighboring them seek and form a partnership with the United States due to its military strengths and capabilities6. The reason for their alliance seeking remains that Russia and China have far much sophisticated military power only matching that of the United States. Russia still healing from its wounds of the fall of the Soviet Union fights hard for recognition. On the other hand, the Chinese became more aggressive in their fight for a piece of the international cake. With the rise of Nations of the second axis against the first axis, it remains possible for a conflict to brew between these potential allies. The abilities of China and Russia on the war front remains as something that cannot stand, under-estimated to their American counterpart and its allies. The Chinese interest in acupuncture is a dangerous weapon when worse comes to worst. The Chinese has an interest in developing and using its electronic magnetic pulse, which when used could deal the recipient a hard blow. China and Russia do not have any other interest other than to rid the world the American leadership. The main issues for Russia being isolation and sanction tactics that stood used by to resolve the Ukraine crisis. For China, other than the use of torture, America needs to rebalance Asia. Another valid reason for China forming a coalition with Russia stands that the United States of America tries to contain the aggressive growing China. The three countries; China, Russia, and Iran have a common problem being held down by the United States. With more down, holding a possibility of a fully blown alliance between the countries to counter the weight of the United States of America in their case7. It also sounds incredibly hard for the two countries to get played by the United States to fight each other rather it remains simple for the two countries to come together in an effort to oppose the pressure The Unite States puts on the countries, and especially in different spheres each country considers sensitive. Suggestively China supports the actions of Russia and advises NATO not to complicate the issues by issues. The alliance of China and Russia led to the signing of a four hundred billion for thirty years for the natural gas industry. The militaries of these two countries have trained together in the East China Sea. Showing Japan which has seen a lot of tension growing from Beijing. Conclusion The two countries have made a lot of efforts to counter traditional United States military used advantages in the past. These developments stand in counter cyber-attacks, counter space, anti-ship as well as anti-air. On the other hand, Iran makes an effort to become a nuclear power. Syria also falls into a position that supports the second axis because of the staunch decisions by Russia. According to the statistics, American offenders have a large number of prisons more than all the rest of the country. The number is larger than Russia, China, and North Korea combined. The statistics make up for the number of individuals contributing to the success of developments in industries and weapons. China undermines the United States by investing in Crimea as well as planning on containing the United States of America strategically. In the strategy, the two states ignored the United States and the European Union. The United States treaty with Japan is covering several islands claimed by China and Japan. The Chinese and the Russia placed oil rigs and limited the amount of oil drilled in the area and exported to America. Drilling oil just within the Vietnamese waters, in retaliation five hackers of Chinese decency, were indicted for cyber-crime. The two states have come together and increasingly threatened smaller countries neighboring them. The countries ally themselves to the United States. The differences between these two countries remain that the sensitivity of sanctions, but the commonalities come way back from World War I and World War II. In this sense, a bitter rivalry continues getting fueled by little offenses between the three states with the two allied. List of References Gates, Jeffrey R. 2008. Guilt by association: how deception and self-deceit took America to war. Santa Barbara, Calif: State Street Publications. Gardner, Lloyd C., and Marilyn Blatt Young. 2007. Iraq and the lessons of Vietnam or, how not to learn from the past. New York: New Press. Mearsheimer, John J., and Stephen M. Walt. 2008. The Israel lobby and U.S. foreign policy. London: Penguin. Ritter, Scott. 2010. Dangerous ground Americas failed arms control policy, from FDR to Obama. New York: Nation Books. http://www.contentreserve.com/ Sniegoski, Stephen J. 2008. The transparent cabal the neoconservative agenda, war in the Middle East, and the national interest of Israel. Norfolk Read More