Indeed, the nature and outcome of warfare, as of any human endeavor, are largely dependent on the individual talents and cumulative experiences of the people who engage in it. To study the material and technological aspects of modern warfare to the exclusion of its emotional, spiritual, and intellectual elements is foolish…
Indeed, the nature and outcome of warfare, as of any human endeavor, are largely dependent on the individual talents and cumulative experiences of the people who engage in it. To study the material and technological aspects of modern warfare to the exclusion of its emotional, spiritual, and intellectual elements is foolish. The very existence of war requires that one possess not only the physical means to sustain an armed struggle but a mentality that predisposes one to initiate it or persevere in it. It follows, then, that hostilities cease when one of these two essential elements has been destroyed--when one combatant no longer possesses either the physical means or the psychological will to carry on the fight. What were the dominant ideologies and institutions of international politics of the twentieth century? At the dawn of the twenty-first century, this seems a particularly appropriate question to ask. What distinguished them, what were their limitations, what was their potential, and what prospects do they hold for the new millennium? The purpose of combat operations is to physically destroy the enemy's physical and material ability to make war. The objective of psychological operations is to erode his will to continue the fight.John W. Dower's War without Mercy: Race and Power in the Pacific War (New York: Pantheon, 1986) is a superb analysis of the impact of cultural stereotypes and racism on the conduct of the war in the Pacific.
John W. Dower assesses the impact of racial hatred, cultural stereotypes, and acid psychological factors on the conduct of the Pacific War. Yet his treatment of wartime atrocities, Japanese adherence to "death before dishonor," and Americans "obsessed with the task of slaughter" reveals only part of the story.
Although he refers to the surrender of demoralized Japanese soldiers, the subject is peripheral to his work. This is understandable given his focus, yet one is left with a very dear impression that such occurrences were extraordinarily rare and insignificant events.
More problematic is Dower's assertion that Americans in decision-making positions were so singularly unimpressed with the idea of waging a serious propaganda campaign against the Japanese that "such ideas had little impact." In fact, this is not the case. Psywar was not an afterthought on the part of Allied military commanders, nor was it always perceived as some "impractical plaything of effete civilians."2 In their attempts to demoralize Japanese troops Allied propagandists in the Southwest Pacific alone disseminated nearly 400 million propaganda leaflets and witnessed the capture of approximately 19,500 Japanese prisoners.
The dearth of historical inquiry into the conduct of psywar against the Japanese, likely results from assumptions that deserve closer scrutiny.
One such assumption seems to be that psywar could not have been effective against an enemy so thoroughly indoctrinated in a tradition that emphasized "death before dishonor" and the supreme virtues of loyalty to the emperor, unquestioning obedience to one's superiors, and self-sacrifice in the service of the nation.
To be sure, soldiers in the IJA were thoroughly imbued with these values. But just as it did not prevent them from experiencing defeat on the battlefield, military indoctrination did not safeguard the emperor's soldiers from the ill effects of demoralization. The evidence shows that as the war progressed and Allied military successes mounted, morale among Japanese combatants markedly declined and Japanese soldiers became increasingly susceptible to the Allied war of words.
Pacific War narratives provide graphic images of the brutal fighting in the Pacific, the atrocities committed by combatants, and the fight-to-the-death mentality that dominated among all fighting men in what has been characterized as a savage race war. ...
Cite this document
(“U.S. & Japan Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/politics/283955-us-japan
(U.S. & Japan Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words)
“U.S. & Japan Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/politics/283955-us-japan.
U.S. Space Program vs. Japan Space Program
In the early periods of space exploration, most countries were unwilling or lacked the ability to explore the resources required for large scale national space programs. In fact, during this period only the US and the Soviet Union supported these kinds of programs.
Why is luxury market growing so rapidly comparing to Japan and U.S.? The objective of this paper is to know what is the reason Japanese and the people of the United States have stopped buying luxury products, the amount of sales made by these two countries have tremendously went down.
Then the treatment of Japanese citizens by the United States during the Second World War is discussed in a great detail. Lastly a conclusion is provided for at the end of the essay.The early Japanese people hunted and gathered food.
Military dominance over politics was prevalent and all these emperors were the supreme commanders of troops in Japan. In 1603, Ieyasu was chosen shgun ("Commander of the Armies"). He established the Tokugawa shogunate. The Tokugawa shogunate enacted a range of measures to direct the autonomous daimyo.
We firstly, look at Japan as an economic giant and the genesis of it. Next we look at the foreign policies adopted by Japan and check if an investment climate exists in Japan. Under the current scenario, a lot of global economies are opening up and the impact it has on the US investment in Japan under the aegis of US - Japan Investment Initiative, 2001.
The United States’ history would have been changed. The Cold War would have escalated to a full fledged war, or not even happened. The Soviet Union would have expanded through Germany, but due to the cultural differences
Japan had historically been in favour of trade liberalization and deregulation of all trade barriers. Prior to 1960, Japan had imposed strict trade restrictions in the form of quotas and tariffs. However, gradually these impediments were lifted so that the domestic industries gathered the technical skills to compete with the external players.
By comparing China to Japan and the United States, we will be able to track since when it is this started happening and see if China is going to strive even more in the luxury products market. When these large luxury market
s, Japan and the Eurozone.The experience examined by Contessi regarding inflation was accurate because they yearly inflation experienced due to personal consumption expenditure lie, for example in the month of April was found to be 1.98 percent in 2012 before dropping in October
Occupation of Japan by the United States was a clear indication of the transformation between the two nations. Japan and America had been in a bitter rivalry before the incidence and therefore, the occupation was meant to form a close alliance of the two. During the incidence of the Pacific war that occurred from 1941 to 1945, both nations were in a bitter war.
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic U.S. & Japan for FREE!