Democratic globalism is a foreign policy that has guided the United States foreign policy for this decade. This policy defines the national policy and nation's foreign interest not as power but as values and solely identifies the value of success and liberty.However this foreign policy is hesitant to commit blood and treasure in matters of pursuing democracy and accepts war in places where there is strategic necessity or a war waged to an enemy that poses a global threat to freedom of the whole world. This policy was hatched during the days of John Kennedy and has grown since then to influence most of the United States foreign policy today. The policy has been reckoned to have a vision on the world in which the United States seeks the advance of freedom and the peace that comes with that freedom and it should be beyond the balance of power of the simple pursuit of interest. Proponent of this policy however finds it difficult to sell to other people based on its roots. It is beyond power; more and more people wants power over others. It is beyond interest; the world is driven by interest beyond humanity. Hence this policy is more of a political appeal carrying with it more responsibility of promoting democracy to the whole world and making sure all people in all corners of the world enjoy this peace beyond oppression by regimes.According to Elman (1996), it is deeply in America based on its development history. America is not a nation built on blood, race or other vices, but it is built solely on proposition and democracy. This policy is difficult to be accepted in foreign countries which have not inculcated the value of democracy, freedom and peace into the culture of its people. During the invasion of Iraq, a war led by America on pursuit of democratic globe, the then British Prime Minister Tony Blair, found it very difficult to sell the policy to the Britons. It is amazing that most European countries with exception of Britain, finds this policy hopeless and irritating morally.
Most of the European countries must find the policy so hard to implement because they have not inculcated this policy in their culture. At the time they were superpowers, European countries concentrated on making a political empire which ha interest of power and exploitation. They scrambled for the world and partitioned it to themselves with Britain taking large parts of the world into its empire. It occupied and partitioned America and they had to be driven out by war. The story reckoned everywhere in other parts of the world. They were forcefully driven out of Africa and Asian countries through blood shed. The globalization policy that is held by European countries is that of exploitation and amassment of power. According to Kagan (2005), this is perhaps one of the reasons why the world misjudged American intention invading Iraq due to the prior experience they had with European countries. It was seen as another scramble for colonization.
During the Second World War, American entered into the war to help its former colony Britain and with little interest in assuming the world superpower position. However as the war progressed, America was exposed to what was happening in the world and immediately after the war, American leaders saw the need to change the world and make it more democratic. But unfortunately it was misunderstood right from the start of its campaigning for a free world. According to Ted (2002), America entered the war with an aim of bringing social construction on international politics as expressed by Moscow.
But the American policy of democratic globalism is based on inspiration that comes from the Truman Doctrine of 1947, the Kennedy inaugural speech of 1961 and 1983s Reagan's speech of 'evil empire'. One common idea about all these speech was that they
Democratic globalism is a foreign policy that has guided the United States foreign policy for this decade. This policy defines the national policy and nation's foreign interest not as power but as values and solely identifies the value of success and liberty…
US Post Cold War Interventionism Foreign Policy
The interventionism foreign policy that United States adopted in the post Cold War era has left the country and citizens more insecure than ever before.
The country has spent billions of dollars, which unfortunately has not translated into tangible sense of security for American interests within and outside the country’s borders.
Unlike his predecessor he recognised the importance of wealth creation for being strong. From the midst of the Deng's era in china the economic policies started dominating the foreign and military policy of any country in the world. Though China fought with US in Korea and in case of Taiwan in his period he was successful in being a strategic partner for US and achieving MFN status for his country.
Conflict, violence, warfare - have dominated the scene, whereas, justice and rules have always been overshadowed by the acts of the rulers and diplomats of the super powers mostly. There are two schools of thought viz. Universal Moralism, which is governed by good behavior always and another extreme of foreign policy is concern with National Interest i.e.
Many in the West called this a victory with many praising U.S. President Ronald Reagan and his aggressive, military policy towards the Soviet Union. Francis Fukuyama called it the end of history.1 Others looked to the future with U.S. President George H. W.Bush speaking about a 'new world order'
No other country can match the health and productivity of its economy, the extent of its scientific and technological resources, its ability to sustain massive levels of defense spending, or the power, sophistication, and global reach of its armed forces.
Although these consequences have been discussed by several generations of American and foreign historians, the debate is still far from being over.Politically, the War resolved arguably the key problem that persisted since the American Revolution of 1776: it proved that the republic is capable of coping with both external and internal threats.
The author states that if the issue is of great importance to the public and there is a common consensus as to how the problem may be resolved between a majority of the public and policy makers, policy makers are likely to be facilitated in their foreign policy aims. The most recent example of this is the US incursion into Iraq in 2003.
These theories include idealism, realism, Marxism, functionalism, dependency and critical theory (Crawford 10). These theories provide an avenue for the analysis of the international policies created by the authority under certain circumstances.
It constitutes an attempt to manage, design and effect control on foreign relations. Foreign policy gives the guideline in as far as a nation’s code of conduct with regard to another nation gets concerned. It could be
4 pages (1000 words)Essay
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic US foreign policy: democratic realism and war for FREE!