The Intelligent Design Movement, as a political force, has encountered resistance and unforeseen difficulties in their effort to affect social change. The issue of the movement, the teaching of the Intelligent Design Theory in public schools, has been met with some criticism…
Referred to as the Christian Right, they were the key to the Republican victories in 2004. They fueled the Republican control of the House, Senate, and Oval Office. Yet, they have still failed to control the destiny of their agenda of moving the Intelligent Design theory closer to the classroom. The movement has been unable to form crucial coalitions and enlist other groups to further their cause. With the exception of isolated activism at a local level, the movement has stalled in their efforts to spotlight Intelligent Design.
Even the isolated, local court activity is waning. The stunning case of Kitzmiller vs. Dover in Dover, PA. has garnered the nation's attention. Because of the blatant Christian agenda, and the school board's past support for creationism, the district is in jeopardy of losing the case and acquiring a 1 million-dollar legal expense bill. (Goodstein, 2005) This will only serve to chill efforts by other school boards already strapped for much needed funds.
Adding to the difficulty of the movement is the perception of the public at large. As people view the movement as a fundamental extension of Christianity, the movement does not portray other, more acceptable, aspects of the group. The values that one would anticipate the group to herald are not expressed in terms of social programs or pacification of defense policies. The movement has instead made a decision to live or die on the issue of Intelligent Design.
In a technological world where the importance of education and the value of science is put to the forefront, Intelligent Design reaches another hurdle. Though the movement has packaged the theory as science, the public is still acutely aware of its theo-centric implications. Phillip Johnson, a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute and major supporter of Intelligent Design stated in a 2003 radio interview, "Our strategy has been to change the subject a bit, so that we can get the issue of intelligent design, which really means the reality of God, before the academic world and into the schools." (as cited in Nickson, 2004). In their effort to mandate the teaching of Intelligent Design, they have alienated the groups they need the most support from, educators and scientists. This miscalculation has left the movement with a weakened political apparatus and limited resources to turn to for support.
The movement has failed in its efforts to be embraced by the scientific community even though they have a history and awareness of the importance of the requirements necessary to be accepted into the realm of science. Even so, they have lacked the will to make a major push on that front. Its critics contend that no scientific research has been published and no articles have been presented that meet peer review. They further charge that the theory does not meet the Daubert Standard set forth by the Supreme Court in 1993 as a standard for scientific evidence. (Wikipedia, 2005)
The move to get Intelligent Design accepted by science without the credentials required has further polarized the opposing parties. Crippled with a stagnated and polarized political arm, the movement has turned to the courts. In various heartland arenas, local and state school boards have taken the issue to the courts for resolution. This may be one more expenditure of political capital and goodwill that they can ill-afford to squander. Courts can settle ...
Cite this document
(“Law and Social Movements Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/politics/293154-law-and-social-movements
(Law and Social Movements Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Law and Social Movements Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/politics/293154-law-and-social-movements.
Social movements, which are contentious politics forms, imply that collective challenges that are based on common purposes along with social solidarities are indulged in carrying collective actions against oppressive regimes. In contentious politics within the Asian continent, the ordinary people join hands with the more influential members of their communities for the purposes of confronting the elites, governments along with their opponents (Meyer, 2004).
According to Hillage and Pollard (1998) “employability is about having the capability to gain initial employment, maintain employment and obtain new employment if required’. My knowledge and skills acquired from university education and through my work live related experience has been responsible for understanding about business.
This group of people works in unity to achieve certain common goals. The social movement in question can be referred to as a reform movement since it advocates for changes in some activities that happen in the country. This is because it addresses the issue about geographical and racial imbalance in the treatment of the citizen of the United States of America.
Industrialization is a process of social and economic turn about whereby a country or state is transformed from an industrialized state to an industrial one through massive advanced technological innovation. This concept is then identified with the economic status of states.
According to the report social movements are any broad social alliances of people who are connected through their shared interest in blocking or affecting social change. Multiple alliances may work separately for common causes and still be considered a social movement. Crowd activities become focused when people act in pursuit of common objectives.
And this often requires some degree of pressure placed on the authorities by various social groups and individual demands.
One of the most popular ways through which people can demand change and require the modification of structures in the political and social arena is
The civil rights movement is a social movement that was organized by black people to address the discrimination and inequality that they faced in the United States. The whites discriminated and treated the blacks harshly because the then
On the other hand, the U.S Civil Rights movement was created to address the segregation and racism that blacks had been subjected to in the United States. The paper will focus on discussing the two major social movements; the civil
4 Pages(1000 words)Thesis
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Law and Social Movements for FREE!