There are many fallacies or assumptions that have been made as a result of the war in Afghanistan. Realistically speaking, the war has been massively underestimated as a problem in the U.S.'s future and has been subsequently underfunded. Mainly these assumptions have caused a huge rift in the national politics of the U.S…
In the war on Afghanistan, many assumptions have been made. These assumptions are the basis for a rational argument that much of what the U.S. has been told about the war in Afghanistan is either untrue or flawed in the sense of being fallacies.
The assumption has been made that the only reason the U.S. went to war was because of Osama Bin Laden not being turned in by the Taliban. President Obama said, "Under the banner of this domestic unity and international legitimacy and only after the Taliban refused to turn over Osama bin Laden " we sent our troops into Afghanistan" (2009, p. 1). Originally, the United States never knew where Osama bin Laden was in the first place. We may have had the "idea" that we knew where he was, but really we never knew where he was. At best, the United States intelligence services have been doing guesswork as to where Osama bin Laden "might" be. The idea that bin Laden was actually in Afghanistan is not necessarily a fact, that is what was assumed; the U.S. never knew where bin Laden was and still doesn't.
Obama also said, "Today, after extraordinary costs, we are bringing the Iraq war to a responsible end. We will remove our combat brigades from Iraq by the end of next summer, and all of our troops by the end of 2011" (2009, p. 1). This writer would call the end of the Iraq War anything but responsible. Obama promised he would end the war immediately as soon as he got in office and he didn't do it. Thus, his statement could most likely be portrayed as a lie.
In one vein, Obama says, "Commanders in Afghanistan repeatedly asked for support to deal with the reemergence of the Taliban, but these reinforcements did not arrive. That's why, shortly after taking office, I approved a long-standing request for more troops" (2009, p. 1). Then, shortly after Obama makes that statement, he says, "Let me be clear: there has never been an option before me that called for troop deployments before 2010, so there has been no delay or denial of resources necessary for the conduct of the war" (2009, p. 1). If there was never an option calling for more deployments before 2010, why does Obama have to reinforce the point that the option was never on the table This also seems like a lie, as though he is covering his tracks. Obviously, if more deployments were needed before 2010 and he turned a blind eye to these important decisions, military and civilians would probably think it reckless and would probably be upset. The fact that Obama has to state the fact that there was never a call for more deployments seems like it is a fallacy created out of the fact that if a lie was not told, many people would be angry about his handling of the war.
Obama also noted, "Afghanistan is not lost, but for several years it has moved backwards. There is no imminent threat of the government being overthrown, but the Taliban has gained momentum" (2009, p. 1). This is an outright lie, as Afghanistan is basically a lost cause. There are too many peaks and valleys there to really infiltrate properly. Also, the capital of Kabul has been very close to being toppled for a long time. Here the President is ...
Cite this document
(“President Obamas Speech Book Report/Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/politics/301670-president-obamas-speech
(President Obamas Speech Book Report/Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“President Obamas Speech Book Report/Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/politics/301670-president-obamas-speech.
Her study entitled Destiny of the Republic: A Tale of Madness, Medicine and the Murder of a President is her second full-length book, and again takes up a narrative dealing with the life and times of an American President. The subject matter is rather serious, since the President in question, James A.
In his opening statement, Mr. President clearly named every body in general and particular to whom he was addressing the speech. Since this was an Acceptance Speech, the approach of Mr. President to start the speech with thanking America for placing her trust and confidence in his abilities to lead her as a President was fairly understandable.
This paper will discuss the main features of Bill Clinton's speaking style and evaluate impression made by his speeches to people. Some interesting and well known speeches of Bill Clinton will be analyzed from rhetorical point of view.
The first Clinton's speech to be analyzed is his speech to Veterans Organizations on Kosovo which took place on May 13, 1999 at the Office of the Press Secretary, the White House.
The employment of figurative language and other rhetorical devices in his speech helped the President to convey his points to the hearts of the listeners and millions of people were inspired by this elevating and intense speech. It is celebrated as a great poem as well as a great sermon by Lincoln.
They can portray the grayest of statistics in a vibrant light that makes them leap from the page and become more memorable. Just as in a cake, bad ingredients can detract from its quality and weaken an otherwise good argument. Bias and fallacies can leave an argument defenseless against the opposing viewpoint.
Edwards was a Calvinist, and therefore viewed salvation as a predestined gift: humans from birth are either destined for salvation, or not, according to the will of God. The human is impotent to act and gain salvation for himself. God condemns all for sin, but extends mercy to a few whom He chooses.
spill that causes great damage to the nation’s shores as well as its citizens (To quote his own words: “And tonight, I’ve returned from a trip to the Gulf Coast to speak with you about the battle we’re waging against an oil spill that is assaulting our shores and our
Fei’s America’s crisis of faith of article that we read, showed that American’s problem was not with the crisis of energy but it was due to lack of faith in the existing government system and the leaders within it. President Carter in his speech believed that lack of
Furthermore, the key problems discussed, varied theoretical issues and arguments against the viewpoints made by the author will also be presented in this book review assignment.
The book “Post-Racial Mystique: Media and Race in the
5 Pages(1250 words)Book Report/Review
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Book Report/Review on topic President Obamas Speech for FREE!