The Aggression and Aggression - Assignment Example

The Aggression and Aggression This paper answers the aggression questionnaire that tests the aggressiveness of the subject or participants. The questionnaire was originally designed by Buss and Perry and was used to measure the reliability of the questionnaire about aggression to test the correlation of the subject’s personality and reaction towards aggression (p.236). The questionnaire contains four aggression factors: physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, and hostility. From the sample questionnaire, I have subdivided the factors with different questions in order the subject or participants answer the question reliably and to make sure that there answer is correlated with their personality. Direct questions were made and so expected from the participants to answer the questions directly. We will be able know the participants if how aggressive they are and what personality they have that urge them to aggress. I have answered the questions I’ve made and had four of my family members and four people outside family members answered the same questions. On the first factor which is physical aggression, questions are the following: 1.) How will you react if you are mad? 2.) How will you react towards people who pushed you to get mad? 3.) Do you hit somebody when you are at anger? 4.) What is your very reason of hitting a person? 5.) Do you control your urge to strike a person when you’re extremely aggravated? 6.) How will you react if somebody hit you? 7.) Do you indulge yourself into fights when somebody provoked you to fight? 8.) How will you react if somebody steps your pride, for instance, you have not given privilege to do your rights. 9.) Do you threat someone, if yes, why and in what way? I have answered the first question as “I don’t physically aggress, I only tell my thoughts and defend my side enough for me to show to others that I am mad”. We have the same thoughts with my family members about physical aggression; two of my family members said that they won’t talk when they are mad, while the other two said that they will show their intense reaction if how mad they are. The other participants showed their actions whenever they are mad. The first subject does nothing when he is normally mad but if intensely mad, he yells to someone and the worst, hit a person. The second subject will yell intensely when mad and punch someone if he can’t control the temper. The third subject directly hits a person when too much mad and, the fourth subject always hit a person when he is mad. On the second question, I answered as “I don’t react directly when in front of the people”. Two of the family member said that they will raise the same thoughts to others while the other two will confront the situation in front of the person. The other four subjects answered the same as they yell people and hit when they can’t control their temper. On the third question, we have the same answer with my family members; we don’t hit anybody even if we are deeply mad. While the other four answered similarly; the first answered yes only if intensely mad, the second answered yes if the temper is uncontrollable, the third answered always yes while the fourth answered extremely yes. The fourth question is not applicable for me and my family members. One of the other four subjects said that he only hit if the person made him too much mad, the second subject said he wants to let out his feeling of anger that’s why he punch when at mad, the third and fourth participants answered the same as they can’t control themselves when they are mad that’s why they hit a person. The fifth question is still not applicable for us family members while the other four subjects answered the same as “no”, they can’t control themselves to hit a person when they are too much mad. The sixth question is never been applicable for us family as we always try to avoid situations like people who are aggravated will punch us and so far, it never been happened that somebody hit us. One of the other four subjects said “it depends, if the person hit me too much then I might hit that person back”. Two answered the same “of course, I hit that person back”. The last subject said that he hit the person until he gets satisfied of hitting such. While the seventh question is not applicable for my family, three of the other four subjects said “yes”, the other one said “sometimes”. We (I and family) have the same belief and perceptions on the eighth question; if our pride has been stepped by other people and that our rights have almost ruined by others then we may resort to the right way of settling the situations, suit to lawful actions. The other four subjects are violent as they as they encourage fight just to protect their rights and reserve their pride, they will not cease until they wins, the last subject id\s very brutal as he said that he doesn’t for whatever might happen even if it flows barrel of blood. The last question is still not applicable for my family, three of the four subjects said “no”, they don’t have a reason to threat someone but, the last subject said that if the fight is uncontrollable then he might end up of killing someone. Questions of the verbal aggression factor are the following: 1.) How will you react if your friend or someone you know disagrees with you? 2.) How often do you disagree others thoughts and ideas? 3.) Do you tell your thoughts to others if you are annoyed at them? 4.) What others usually tell you when you argue? I and my family answered the same on the first question, we tend to disagree depends on the situation. One of the other four subject said “if I found their thoughts good enough then I might agree with them, otherwise I might tell them that I disagree with them too”. The other three answered the same that they might show how they disagree from others whose thoughts are not enough to be trusted. On the second question, me and my family answered the same as “not often” as we respect others idea but still we raise our thoughts too. One of the four subject answered like this “it depends; sometimes I disagree with their thoughts if I found unscrupulous”. The second answered “I just sometimes disagree if I have better thoughts”. The third answered “I only disagree if I think their thoughts are not good enough” while the fourth answered “I always disagree if their thoughts hurt me”. On the third question, I and two of my family members said “not at all times” as we are hesitant to tell truth if we thought that what we might tell to others might hurt them. Two of my family members said that they will tell directly in order that people will be aware on what he has done wrong. The other four participants said that they will always tell directly how they are annoyed at the person. On the last question, when I tend to argue people tell me that sometimes they can understand me and sometimes cannot. My family members said the same that people tell both positive and negative when they raise suggestions. One of the other four subjects said “they tell me the same thing until I get satisfied or they force me to agree with them”. The second said “hardheaded”, the third said “people always told me to calm” and the fourth said “violent”. The anger factor has the following questions: 1.) What makes you mad? 2.) Do you get yourself composed immediately right after from anger? 3.) What do you feel when you are mad? 4.) Do you easily get angry? 5.) Do you control your temper? If can’t, what hinders you from controlling? I and my family answered the same on the first question as we are mad on where we uncomfortable and that opposes to our interest. The fist four of other participants said “when somebody argues with me”. The second said “when things are perplexing”. The third said “when everything turns out difficult” and the last said “anything that opposes to my interest”. We have the same answer with my family on the second question; we easily bring back ourselves into normal after we get angry. The first of the other subjects said, “sometimes when there’s someone who can pacify me from anger”. The second said, “sometimes”, the third said “no and it takes too long for me to be composed”, and the fourth said, it’s hard for me to be composed even after my anger”. On the third question, I and my family feel the same of uncomfortable feeling when we a re mad and we want to let out that feeling but in control. The first said, “there’s something inside of me which I can’t explain and that burn me”. The second said, “I feel like everything is terrible”, the third said “I feel like bursting”, and the fourth said, “I always feel to explode that’s why I always show how mad I am”. On the fourth question, I and my family don’t easily get angry. While the other participants do, and said yes. On the fifth questions, I and my family members can easily control our temper while the other four participants answered similarly. The first and second said the same as “sometimes” while the third and fourth answered the same in different reasons. The third said, “I can’t as I tend to show my feeling how mad I am”, and the fourth said “I can’t, not a single minute as I feel that people are always against me.” The last factor which is hostile factor has the following questions: 1.) What do you feel when your in the midst of unexpected circumstances? 2.) How is your feeling toward different things? 3.) Do you feel that others or someone you know have talked or laugh at you behind your back? 4.) What do you think of somebody whom you don’t know that are very open and friendly? How about people you know when they are nice at you? I always appreciate mysteries behind circumstances whether can be explained or not, so on the first question, unexpected circumstances for me is another mystery to solve. Two of my family members said, the more unexpected the more thrilled, the more thrilled the more surprising, and surprises are appreciative whether good or bad there is something that can be learned along with surprises. The other two said, “I feel that there’s another challenge to overcome”. The other four participants said differently, the first said, “I feel uncertainties”, the second said “I feel irritated”, the third said “I feel that there’s something interesting but annoying on the other side”, and the fourth said, “I feel like there’s another trouble, whatever it is I need to win”. I and my family feel the same on the second question and that we have a mixed feeling, positive and negative, joy and sorrow, in other words, it depends on how we perceived things. One of the other four participants said the same and that he feels both good and bad towards different things. The second said “unfair”, the third said “unbalance as there are lots of negative than positive”, and the fourth said “unequal treatment”. On the third question, I and two of my family members cannot determine if someone talked about us or even laugh at us behind our back while the other two are a little suspicious and said “those people who are in groups and facing towards us are never been doubt that they talked something about us”. One of the other four participants said “yes, when there’s something new happened in my life then rumors are easily spread”. The second said “sometimes but that is expected, when there is new comes hearsay follows”. The third said “yes, when there’s unexpected event happened in my life, people cannot wait to confront to me directly instead, they spread the rumor easily”. The last said “always”. On the last question, I and two of my family members said that there’s nothing wrong to people who wants to make friends but if they acted differently then they are suspicious enough. Two of my family members said “be wary to those people who are overfriendly, what is too much is not good enough”. The other four participants said differently. The first said “they’re just making friends and I will be nice to them if I like them”. The second said “it depends as there’s sometimes they are nice at me when they want something from me especially when they asked me for a favor”. The third said “good enough when they just want to make friends but sometimes I feel awkward, and they are irritating when too much nice as they are like showing off for something”. The last said “people who are very nice with good motive are good to be with otherwise are suspicious. I can easily detect when people who are very nice to me want something from me or not, so definitely if they have pure intention then I’ll be nice to them too”. Verbal and physical aggression factors are closely related with temperament activity, but anger factor is strongly correlated with verbal, physical and hostility factors (p.239). This illustrates from the given test to the participants; for instance, the reason of the last participant that makes him mad is when anything opposes to his interest (anger factor). This correlates the verbal factor when someone argues and disagrees with his thought, he tends to object too. Now if a person hit him and since this is one of the factors that opposed to his interest, the factor also that makes him mad which he can’t control the temper, of course he has to hit back that person. The tendency that makes him hostile toward others is because of unequal treatment. This begins the complex pattern of being emotional, anti-sociable, and impulsive (p.241), as he easily responds to hitting someone when he’s hurt and tends to be very suspicious to those who are overfriendly. Overall, the test will vary from the changing personality of the individual, since the factors are intercorrelated, one changes of each factor may affect also to other factors. Just like if the subject tends to change his perception and personality, then maybe he can control his temper and can change his habit of hitting a person. Sources: Buss, A.H. & Perry,M. (2003). Social Psychology. (Marianne Miserandino & W. Renee Walker ed.). Thomas Edison State College, Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing. p.236. Buss, et al. p.239 Buss, et al. p.241 Read More