Now according to the case it was a story about a woman who came to the police station to lodge a complaint about being raped. We have only seen the conversation between two parties the woman and the police. At first there were only two police officers one of them was a lady, initially they asked her to tell them about the incident. According to the victim she could not able to recognize the criminal. She said that they were in a same car and went into a compound of a house then the rapist grabbed her from behind when they were inside the compound. She gave a brief description about the rapist. The rapist is a blonde, has mustache and also have tattoos, stocky built. He has heavy chest and wearing a blue shirt. She resisted by saying ‘what are you doing?’ only!
After hearing the incident those police officer went inside and talked with their senior about the incident. They exclaimed that they are not at all convinced by what the lady said and there are some other loopholes in lady’s version of the story.
Again the senior police officers interrogate her about the incident and she did not able to give proper answer about the reason why she did not went to the nearby police station and why she did not protested properly. In interrogation it was revealed that she is not an one man woman last she has done sex with her boy friend and before that she has another two boyfriend and had sex with them also. She is married woman and staying with her husband. She agreed during the interrogation that she has come to the police station because her boy friend told her to do so. She was not able to give proper answer when she was asked about why did not she screamed when she get into the car. It was interpreted that she was willingly went into the car that why she did not scream. The full conversation was recorder audio visually. After that when she was asked about her consent to appeal