Case study peer reveiw 3 - Coursework Example

Case Study 3 Peer Review 2 Affiliation Response to Doug Parrish’s Argument According to Doug, choosing the ‘The Gathering Place” for Shania’s coffeehouse is both a terrible idea and a not-so-bad idea as well. As a bad idea, Doug points that the name does not indicate the type of product or service the business establishment trades. As a good idea, Doug recognizes that any name can be used for a business establishment – thus, The Gathering Place is not such a bad choice. On the other hand, Doug points that the business model is better suited if it were a Limited Liability Company as this would limit the liabilities to the owner and provide the opportunity to partner with other investors such as Shania’s sister, her neighbor, and the husband.

On the contrary, my argument and Doug’s differ at a reasonable scale provided the perspectives each of us has taken to respond to Shania’s situation. In my case, I think Shania should establish a sole proprietorship so that she can meet her goals of serving only Christian patrons and maintaining a focused approach without having to consult with another party. On the aspect of whether Shania should involve other parties in her business, I recommended that she adapts a sole proprietorship model from a business perspective.

However, Doug advises Shania to open an LLC from a biblical perspective. The contrast between Doug’s argument and mine is that each of us emphasizes on the merits of the provided perspective. Through religious reasoning, Doug thinks an LLC will be the best choice. Through business analysis, I find sole proprietorship much reasonable for the coffeehouse.Promotion of a Night Shift Supervisor The Colorado Legal Services (2014) states that Chapter 9 of the Labor Law protects individuals from discrimination at the workplace and provides guidance to employees on the courses of action they should take if discriminated.

Mathew 7:12 states that “So whatever you wish that others would do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets” (Open Bible, 2014). With reference to the labor law, discrimination is disallowed therefore Shania cannot discriminate the other employees for not being ethnic minorities. This is not a shared qualification that all employees can support. Religiously, the bible reference shows that Shania should take the best course of action that would is inclusive of all. Finally, the Herzberg Two-Factor Theory indicates that motivated employees perform better than unmotivated employees.

Promoting one individual based on his/her ethnic status is a way of demotivating the rest of the employees who feel equally or better qualified than the chosen candidate. The theory stipulates that managers or employers who recognize employees by offering them open chances for career development, nurture performing employees. Therefore, Shania should design a performance-appraisal program that would accurately analyze the qualifications of each employee to avoid discrimination (NetMBA, 2014).

ReferencesColorado Legal Services. (2014). Employment Discrimination. Accessed online on December 8, 2014 from http://www.coloradolegalservices.org/lawhelp/resource/employment-discrimination?ref=AejCTNetMBA. (2014). Herzberg’s Motivation-Hygiene Theory (Two Factor Theory). Accessed online on December 8, 2014 from http://www.netmba.com/mgmt/ob/motivation/herzberg/Open Bible. (2014). Discrimination. Accessed online on December 8, 2014 from http://www.openbible.info/topics/discrimination