It does not think that the act of abortion is legitimate under all circumstances. The position considers that the mother and fetus have certain rights. The conflict of rights is created because of the different considerations for the mother, fetus and the society. However, the acceptability of the action depends on the severity of such conditions. For example, if it is feared that there are chances that the fetus will born deformed, moderate position will allow abortion in such cases. The reason behind the acceptance of abortion in this case is that it will cause tremendous pain and suffering to the mother and the fetus itself. The loss or pain cause by giving birth to a child would be greater than the tragedy and loss of abortion. In other words, moderate position on abortion is the rational view of abortion. It requires doing what is best for the mother and the fetus. Hence it is a better alternative to conservative and liberal approaches. The moderate approach strikes a balance between liberal and conservative positions. I agree with this position because many a times there are situation when it is necessary to abort the child. People also have a tendency to abuse the abortion. They take it for granted and use it at the cost of rights of the fetus or the child. This harms the sanctity of life. Many people have compared such an act with murder. Since, it has been proven that the fetus gets the life after four months. Unlike liberal approach, the moderate approach will assume that the right of abortion for women should be until four months only. After that abortion should only be allowed if there are severe medical issues, it is feared that the child will be deformed, or in cases of rape and incest. Similarly, the moderate approach is better than conservative approach because it thinks that abortion should not be allowed under any condition. This approach can lead to fatal consequence. For example, if the woman dies in the process of child birth. This would lead to loss of two lives. Hence, a rational approach in this case would be to allow abortion under certain scenario and let people use the option for the benefit of themselves and the benefit of the entire society. The moderate position on abortion takes into account various ethical frameworks. It takes into account the deontological framework in way that it calls for abortion in cases where the motives of the action are pure. It needs people to weigh the pros and cons of the action before taking the final action. As a result, the motives behind the moderate approach are more often than not pure and hence the deontological framework justifies the decisions taken under deontological framework. Rights-based ethics also justify the moderate position on abortion. Since, a part of women body is involved in the process of child birth, she has a right to abort the child if she want to. If she feels that the entire process of child birth is too painful for her body, or it will cause her stress then she can use right based ethics to justify her decision of aborting the fetus. Even consequential ethics allow the parents to abort the fetus. For example, if it is considered that overall standard of living of a family would fall after the birth of another child, the parents can choose to abort the child and this can be justified by using the consequential approach. Similarly, if it is felt that the birth of the child can lead to medical issues for the women or can lead to a deformed child that can cause stress and
Name Date University Moderate Position on Abortion Moderate position creates a balance between conservative and liberal position on abortion. Moderate position states that the final decision for abortion should be based on the suffering of the fetus and the women…
Abortion is a topical issue within the society and has over the years gained a lot of relevance. Statistics indicate that, in the U.S., close to half of pregnancies registered among American women remain unintended with four out of ten of these pregnancies by age 45 ending up by termination by abortion.
Abortion is one of the most contentious ethical issues in contemporary society. It polarizes public opinion, and there is a tendency for individuals and groups to adhere to rigid stances, which do not admit any compromise. The three main positions on abortion are the conservative, the liberal and the moderate.
Should we make sure we get universal access first before making such changes to taboos and traditional restrictions concerning the medical professions, because it could have potentially unfair or even genocidal effects? Give reasons for holding your view.
Abortion is a sensitive issue that has diverse views such as preventing grave injuries to the woman, substantial risks to the child in the event that it is born, among others. This poses questions on levels and grounds on which a woman is allowed to undergo abortion.
Edward Tolman was an American psychologist who believed that learning occurs after a given reinforcement. He conducted his experiments on rats, and man to determine how learning takes place within an individual. Donald Hebb was a Canadian psychologist who looked at neuropsychology, and how it influenced an individual’s behavior in terms of learning.
There have been various methods of inducing an abortion throughout the centuries. In the 20th century, the ethics and morality of abortion became the subject of intense political debate in many areas of the world.
Abortion is an act that I would classify as being immoral.
The long and contentious moral and theological debate over the precise moment when personhood should be recognized is, in itself, perhaps the most compelling argument that incorporating the use of personhood language in the defense of both the right to life and the right to choose perspectives is highly problematic.This was displayed most notably in the 1973 Supreme Court Decision of Roe v.
Roe vs. Wade (1973) ("Roe v. Wade", wikipedia.org) legalized abortion in America, and ever since two apparently irreconcilable forces have arisen. The first, pro-life (or anti-choice according to their enemies) see, at their most extreme, any abortion as tantamount to murder (www.nrlc.org), while the pro-choice (or pro-abortion according to their enemies) see, at their most extreme any abortion (even the of the so-called 'partial birth type) as morally acceptable.
This was displayed most notably in the 1973 Supreme Court Decision of Roe v. Wade1 which based its landmark decision not on the issue of personhood, but rather on the viability of the fetus outside of the womb. This decision affirmed the