The case revolves around a school set up where a student, Mary Sue, notices strange experience in her friend, Kim. Mary, worried about her friend’s condition, reports the matter to Ms. Broudy for assistance…
Broudy for assistance. She notes that Kim had shown her cuts on her body and confessed that she was fed up with her condition. While Kim had revealed that her father was involved in her condition, Mary suspected domestic molestation or ‘self-infliction’, concerns that she communicated to Ms. Broudy. Broudy determined to help but Kim was not willing to open up. As a result, Broudy reported the matter to the school principle and counselor but they took no action. Kim’s parents were equally unconcerned about her condition. Possible action for Ms. Broudy Ms. Broudy’s position identified her as a custodian to students while within the school’s premises. She also had a moral obligation as a member of the society to ensure others’ well being. A number of ethical issues therefore arise to determine possible courses of action for any person in Bourdy’s position. She was for example bound by ethical principles of “respect for the dignity of persons, responsible caring, and responsibility to society” (Pope and Vasquez, p. 93, 94). As a result, Bourdy was under ethical obligation to protect any of her students from any form of bodily degradation such as molestation or physical abuse. The duty of care and social responsibility also required her to protect students from possible ‘self-inflicted’ harm. ...
My decision to talk to Kim and finally report the matter to the administration would be supported by “consequentialist theory” that values impacts of a decision or an action. This is because if successful, such actions would help Kim out of her problem. I would also consider reporting the matter to law enforcement agency if the school failed to help Kim (Strike and Soltis, p. 158- 160). Neglect or abuse Possibility of neglect Neglect defines failure to provide for and protect a child from harm. Based on the facts of the case, if the parents were not involved in abusing Kim, then they were responsible for negligence. This is because the parents had evidently failed to take actions to protect their child from her source of harm. The injuries having been on Kim’s wrist suggested that the parents were aware of what their child was going through but did not bother to seek a solution. Similarly, their response when called upon by the school’s administration also indicated lack of interest in protecting Kim from her problem. While her mother did not even comment on the matter, her father disregarded it. Kim’s parents were therefore negligent for failing to protect her from her deteriorating condition. They, contrary to Mary and Broudy’s actions, communicated lack of social responsibility, disregard to other people’s welfare and lack of the moral doctrine of utilitarianism. The parents were as a result neglecting indicators of Kim’s problems that remained unsolved (Pope and Vasquez, p. 93, 94). Difference between neglect and abuse While abuse involves direct infliction of harm to a person, neglect relates to failure to ensure a person’s safety from harm. Neglect is therefore an act of omission while abuse is an act of ...
Cite this document
(“Abuse Neglect Or Nothing to Worry about Case Study”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/religion-and-theology/67618-case-study-analysis-paper
(Abuse Neglect Or Nothing to Worry about Case Study)
“Abuse Neglect Or Nothing to Worry about Case Study”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/religion-and-theology/67618-case-study-analysis-paper.
It has become a dynamic, competitive, and challenging place where one not only accomplishes what he or she has signed up to do but where employees, their managers and employer interact with one another to meet not only company goals, but also job expectations, excellence, satisfaction, as well as rewards.
A man who talked about child cannibalism online was recently charged with enticing a young, 15-year-old boy for a sexual encounter (Solis, 2012). The man, Robert Mucha of Newton, New Jersey, had in the past been charged with child pornography.
Please make sure that all assignment questions are specifically answered, that your answers are clear and your paper is well organized. It is important that you analyze the information you find in various resources, cover relevant areas, formulate conclusions, and provide enough depth, while paying attention to grammar, spelling and punctuation.
In early summer 1981 the United Kingdom and the world was rocked by allegations of child sexual abuse occurring in Cleveland. In the years leading up to 1987, the incidence of child sexual abuse for Cleveland was no greater than for other parts of the UK, but in January 1987 the numbers began to escalate rapidly.
However, when the patient is cared for some other reason in the practice area, such as, surgery, the issues are slightly different, since the secondary effects of alcohol abuse become prominent, and if due to the reason for management, the hospitalized patient needs to abstain from alcohol, the dependence on alcohol and issues with withdrawal becomes prominent (Hudetz et al., 2007, 423-430).
The case study, Is Nothing Private presents a scenario of an advertising strategy in a bid to have FatAway Inc. capture national interest and consequently boost its market share and business aspect. The advertising activity is one that requires massive
The Federal Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) as amended by the CAPTA Reauthorization Act of 2010, defines child abuse as “Any recent act or failure to act on the part of a parent or caretaker which results in death, serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse exploitation” (Definition of Child Abuse and Neglect in Federal Law, n.d.).
The author states that the legal response would be very different if the teacher was male and the student a female because the law deems men as superior sexual figures compared to women. As such, if a man willingly goes out for a schoolgirl in pursuit of sexual favors, then he needs to get a stiffer punishment.
Child abuse is defined as the physical, sensitive and sexual mistreatment of a child or children. There are different forms of child abuse. Neglect is one of the forms of child abuse. It is quite devastating and horrifying to reveal
Therefore, it is irrelevant that the employer or the principal did not actually inflict the loss sustained by the third party (Grace & Vella, 2000).
The legal provisions applicable to this case in determination of whether the employer is liable are
5 Pages(1250 words)Case Study
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Case Study on topic Abuse Neglect Or Nothing to Worry about for FREE!