You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Pages 10 (2510 words)
At all costs we must avoid any double talk when dealing with the bioethical issue of using spare embryos for scientific research. The task ahead is not easy to dissect as there are many conflictive arguments on both sides of the coin. Proponents and opponents abound in the same manner as the pros and cons proliferate with deep and urging intensity…
We have to listen to all sides in order to get a wider idea of the complexity of this debate. But we also have to be firm in our position once we have reached a sound and factual conclusion. That way we avoid any kind of hypocrisy, and there will not be any double talk in our grasp of the issues at hand.
Scientists, lawyers, policymakers, theologians, ethicists, and lay people have something to say about this matter. Many have spoken their minds raising up high their heated arguments. All of them have the right to give their opinions, and we will listen to some of them as we move forward up to our concluding words. We have to keep in mind the fact that at the end God is the centre of the debate. According to the position that we might defend, human freedom of choice becomes an alibi for behaving as we please, or it is the subject of a higher dimension in the eyes of God.
When dealing with new reproductive technologies, we should study the bioethical aspects of such new instruments of Science. ...
Not exactly what you need?