You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Pages 2 (502 words)
2. This idea is very relevant. In the case of Scott Peterson, DNA played a major role in his conviction last year for murdering his wife. The DNA taken and compared with her mother's was the only link the prosecution had in following through with its case…
The other side, or the "Right to Life" group has ventured forward to protest the use of one life to potentially save another, claiming there is no real evidence. Essentially comes down to the question of "When does life begin" It's been widely said that stem cell research in itself has been taken on to a level of usage for political purposes. Politicians taking stances in order to appease their own personal political base. Scientists also have their own stake in this debate because it is bound to be a major scientific breakthrough for the lone scientist(s) who achieve the scientific goldmine. That is, they are in fact the ones who are able find the 'missing link' and cure Parkinson's, MS, or any such other ailment which stem cells are found to be able to cure. It is still early, but there surely will be more debated about and discussed on this topic in the months and years to come.
Not exactly what you need?