The Key Characteristics of a Whistleblower - Essay Example

Flexibility is another characteristic of the whistleblower that ensures the company or organization is not going against the law (Vaughn, 2013). Tenacity- The whistleblower uses stubbornness as a competing curiosity uses must be in due course used as a tool to make a defined and right decision for the business (Gramling, 2014). Sensitivity- Most large business organizations have labor employees across the country; hence, sensitivity as a characteristic of a whistleblower is important because it acts as an eye to the business (Gramling, 2014).

Within the last 12 months, U.S. Supreme Court has been identified to protect the employees through the voice of whistleblowers. The instance to protect employees of publicly company’s contracts March 6, 2014. This was noted to be the first time in the United State of America Supreme Court protected sub-contractors and contractors under Lawson v FMRLL, 571 U.S (2014) (Gramling, 2014). Jonathan M Zang and Jackie Hosang Lawson had a different case in court, alleged retaliation unlawful under act 806 that was against the FMR LLC while the others interrelated to the private company the so-called FMR.

The funds were mutually raised to provide fidelity to the family as persuaded by the contract. The two of them commenced the unlawful action in a federal district court where the private mate was moved to dismiss the plaintiff’s issues. The claims supported that they were not covered as employees under act 1514A (Vaughn, 2013). The plaintiff, therefore, took forth both employees of pu, the public company, and the employees of the contract and sub-contract. After complaints were filed with the health administration and occupational safety, Zang and Lawson began the action of de novo in court.

The court examined the statute text and found that FMR’s interpretation was quite presentable because no evidence suggested discrimination to define how the issues were defiled (Vaughn, 2013). The court also found that it was important to limit the freedom of employees of publicly traded companies (Vaughn, 2013). Zang and Lawson were justified when they forwarded the burning issues to the Supreme Court. For, this reason the first circuit found that, amendment of legislative history to be important.

After these issues were reported by the whistleblowers, most of them were warned by the heads of departments considering them to be stressful departments company (Gramling, 2014). However, the whistleblowers were motivated to see their issues justified finally. On the other hand, the company felt dishonored by the whistleblower (Gramling, 2014). After resolving the issues raised by the whistleblowers, the company experienced quality work from the employees (Gramling, 2014). The whistleblower where justified in reporting the company’s action.

This is because most of the actions were against human rights and actions (Vaughn, 2013). Their reporting brought to light some of the evil activities that used to take place in the private and government industries. For example, sexual harassment and loss of a job are contrary to labor law (Vaughn, 2013). The whistleblower is protected under the Sarbanes-0xley act to the following extent: corporation responsibility, prohibiting employee discrimination, and prohiemployeeloyment harassment, ent/civil (Vaughn, 2013). According to the act the whistleblower is given diverse administrative provisions, criminal, and overtime (Vaughn, 2013).