Conflict Analysis between Israel and Palestine - Research Paper Example

CONFLICT ANALYSIS OF ISRAEL PALESTINE By Conflict Analysis of Israel-Palestine CONFLICT ANALYSIS OF ISRAEL PALESTINEBy Name Institution Date Instructor Conflict Analysis of Israel-Palestine A Brief History of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Over the years, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict has been evolving around the problem of sharing land between the two states. However, the two nations generalize the conflict as a never ending conflict based on ancient and religious differences. This is based on the territorial context that involves land and resolving the border conflicts. In 1890’s, the Zionist leaders picked Palestine as the favorite place to erect a Jewish national home that could be the state for the Jews during a meeting in Switzerland. The implementation of the decision started in late 1910 when the Zionist movement put Palestine under the foreign policy of the government of Britain when the 1st world war ignited. On the other hand, the Hebrews referred to Palestinian territory as the land of Israel. Thus, it made the decision of the Zionist be problematic in nature. In late 1930, the UN Partition plan and Peel Partition Plan redefined the territorial location of the Jews and proposed the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine. The Zionist took over the best Coastal and Valley areas alienating the indigenous Arab people. In this case, Jesrusalem, Judea and Samaria were bound together to become the West Bank. The Arab people rejected the UN Partition plan in 1947 and considered Zionist as a threat to their people. This is because the plan gave authority to Palestine to take over 75 percent of the Arab state making the Arabs to become refugees in the neighboring state Israel. This created a refugee problem in Israel over three decades, but a new political equation was formed in the 1967 and the late 1980’s war (Hunnicutt 2011). Palestinians had refused to respond to any official or diplomatic relation with Israel. This led to more Jewish settlements in Israel leading to the conflict between Palestinians and Israelites. This paper analyzes the main conflict between the two nations; Palestine and Israel. Palestinian refugees During late 1940’s and 1960’s, conflicts made Palestinians to run away voluntarily while others were forced to evacuate. They were moved to bordering countries and thus turned out to be refugees. An estimated 4 million Palestinians are refugees, and most of these refuges live in camps in the Gaza Strip, Syria, West Bank and Lebanon. The refugees get assistance from the United Nations and other bodies and individual willing for help (Faruqi 2011). Violence in Gaza Even though the Palestinians did not have an army in Palestine at this time, rockets were fired on a frequently from Gaza heading to Israel. In return, the Israelis who lived in the bordering towns were used to hide and acclimatizing on a daily basis to handle the rockets. Ever since Israel pulled out its army in 2005, Gaza has witnessed several Israeli attacks. Israel articulates that these attacks were intended to minimize rocket fire. In the year 2008, Israel conducted an operation where they sent an army to Gaza. A projected 1,200 persons, most of them citizens got killed in Gaza. Over 10 Israeli soldiers lost their lives too. In the year 2012, at least 160 Palestinians were murdered in an Israeli military operation (Faruqi 2011). Afterwards, both parties agreed to have a ceasefire to stop the attacks. Peace Process Many nations such as the United States of America have been involved in the war with attempts to end the war between the Palestine’s and Israelis. However, no means of peacemaking process has worked. Most people wish Gaza and the West Bank should be changed into independent countries respectively. Israel fails to agree to these needs unless they are sure there nations are safe. The additional sticking facts are what would transpire to Israelis who have developed in West Bank. This is because they control Jerusalem and the fate of the Palestinian immigrants is not defined (Ben 2008). Peace Process Dynamics Despite the fact that most people view the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as not only an exceptional case, but also a desperate move. It is significant to understand that there are prevailing changing aspects in the conflict that are corporate to other major conflicts and, therefore, expose themselves to evaluation and thought. An in-depth analysis of these changing aspects can be of help to arbitrators and peacemakers that pursue to inspire intelligent official and informal negotiation in the chase of workable resolutions to this conflict. Below are discussed basics common peace processes that can freely be functional to the Israeli-Palestinian case more precisely as negotiators think of the next steps to strengthen and upkeep a workable peace process. Process Progression The Peace process begins once each side understands the importance of embracing the opposing side when looking for a viable solution. In real peace process circumstances, resolutions are occasionally a win-lose or vice Versa. More typical, they are in terms of lose-lose with every party presenting their concerns. Therefore, the main task of each party is to listen the requirements and wishes of the other side and extend the nature of the peace process. The differing parties will often pursue each and every chance likely to squeeze out of the peace processes and circumvent settlements, but that does not disprove the need of coming to terms with what should be specified for a workable deal to be reached. Therefore, it is significant to understand that conflicts do not come to an end, they only change. They can either change from war into politics. In this case, it is less dangerous as lives are not lost, but this could lead to a more serious war. During the procedure, the needs of the victims should be addressed; peace vs. justice issues may be very undermining in post-settlement phases of the peace process. The Peace processes are typically set in stages and provide incremental services to the parties, with each step forward and maybe two back. In the peace process, a step onward produces an extra agreement that will contribute to the forward movement in the direction of an ultimate solution. Achievements are not lost, but they tend to accumulate. Often, coming up with a solution to a conflict is not the main problem with an agreement; in fact, there are typically numerous resolutions to a conflict. Nonetheless, acquiring leaders and citizens to pick up the decision in a composed manner and implementing it is the most problematic part of the peace process. Proper timing and better relationships with the leaders and the people are key to this problem. This is because the ground needs are well prepared for negotiations to withstand a lasting peace, and this necessitates a lot of time and patience. Spoilers Peacemaking processes are in most cases escorted by violence by people who feel they might lose if reconciliations are reached. Its cessation is not a precondition for peace dialogues. This is because it gives rejection power to spoilers. Peace processes, as an alternative, ought to include persons who can destroy them via violence behaviors, though it may be essential to avoid them during certain occasion and times, bringing them in later to improve peace sustainability. In the group of spoilers, there are two groups’ namely main dealers and zealots. Dealers are person who often are accompanied with the right encouragements; it might be indispensable to avoid or cover zealots. The groups of Spoiler are usually neutralized in the best way via the active participation of other previous, existing, or probable spoilers, and they are either as ex-militants or settlers. On the other hand, leaders ought to also distinguish each other’s challenges and assist each other to deliver the compromises, although they hardly do that, this is because most leaders typically think that the opposing side has the easier task. Therefore, leaders frequently face stress from within their personal parties to fight making negotiations. Conflict is practical and offers meaning and substitute meaning to parties that are involved. This generates a necessity to find societal incorporation for both state and non-state peace actors. Nonetheless, there is no fact in ethical arguments that are regularly desired are political reasons. This peace process is a lengthy one; however, predominantly as supporters often choose leaders that assure that they will not give up on their ambitions. Below are the recommendations for the Israeli-Palestine peace process. Recommendations In the Israeli Palestine conflict, no settlement suggestions are put forth. Nonetheless, what is offered are recommendations that consist of the long and short-term suggestions for the Israeli-Palestinian peace development precisely and the Track 1 and 2 actors that are involved. These recommendations re-count predominantly to the final question of the last status debates. Several recommendations are inseparably connected both in existence and outcomes. Even though authorized Track 1 diplomacy is the leading stage whereby the peace discussions procedure play out, the actors will does not perform in a vacuum. There are evidently voids whereby Track 2 actors may fill in a separate manner in maintenance and association with Track 1. Probable tactical methods to implementation of these recommendations are only discussed in general terms. Authorized and unauthorized actors from the worldwide community must pursue to make forums and spaces that encourage brainstorming and the discussion of ideas in-between Israeli and Palestinian populations with concern to peace and the best means of achieving it. This does increases the consciousness of each other’s complaints and tolerates for the development of equal and strong set-ups in spaces where thoughts are expressed without consequences (Ben 2008). Resolutions through collaboration The Situation of peace in Israel and Palestine will best be achieved if these two nations decide to collaborate in social, economic, political and other fields for the advantage of both sides. At the foundation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the element that both parties have entitlements on the same land, and both are certain that their entitlement has a complete historical and moral basis. Ancient situations have led to this position between the two nations. It is identified that social history has been extensively shaped by invasions; in most cases invasions have triggered the overpowered population to withdraw from the path of history as an identifiable entity after mixing with the winning populace or after a total wipe out, and the dominated territory has turned out to be an undisputed possession of the conquerors with not one person left to claim it back. A small number of exceptions to this canon are known, and the demolition of the prehistoric Judean empire two millenniums ago has not been complemented by the vanishing of the Jewish populaces. The people have endured for an extraordinarily long time at the dangerous displacement circumstances, living out of a home ground while conserving unique national features. Solid phases for the revolution of a Jewish State were taken ever since the start of the twentieth century. The holocaust that go together with the Second World War and the point that the fighters in Europe had changed into exiled individuals encouraged the global community to identify the national rights of the Jewish populaces and to support the creation of a Jewish State. Most of the Jewish inhabitants that subsisted in these nations were ejected, and this amplified the stress affecting the development of the Jewish State significantly. Approximately half of the Jewish populace of Israel now are Jews who are from Arab nations and their offspring (Baron 2004). Two states solution and one state solution A practical peace solution is the two nation solution. A Palestinian nation will be created and ruled by a Palestinian government devoid of any Israel intrusion. Settled borders stuck between Palestine and Israel are to be well-defined, Jewish people’s settlements on Palestinian land are to be done away with, except for those that can be incorporated into the Israeli territory on the basis of agreed definitions of the borders. Solutions on the basis of a single state have been supported; the supporters of these resolutions mostly deny any right of the other party. There are parties in Israel that disrespect any Palestinian nationwide rights, they depend on the Israeli power and support a single state resolution with high-class rights to the Jewish populace. There are likewise Palestinian groups that visualize that the State of Israel can be eliminated, and all the land would belong to a Palestinian State; in the years 1950s and 1960s the Palestinian organizations turning a blind eye to any Israeli state rights and relying on the power of the Arab countries encouraged a single state which they would control with the entitlement to choose which Jews are to be admitted to the specific institution.. The notion of a resolution centered on a single "secular" nation develops from time to time in the philosophy of modern groups that vision of peace but neglect reality (Hunnicutt 2011). It is eminent that a two nation’s solution does not suggest withdrawal between the Israeli and the Palestinian nations. There are matters which the two countries cannot manage individually, and they include care of tourism, water resources, environment and may others. Therefore, it is in the best interest for the two countries to cooperate closely. Nonetheless, it is essential for the parties to come to mutual conclusions of the problems of interest to both sides with no feeling of oppression. Bibliography Baron, M. (2004). A never-ending conflict a guide to Israeli military history. Westport: Praeger. Ben, G. (2008). The failure of the Middle East peace process?: a comparative analysis of peace implementation in Israel/Palestine, Northern Ireland and South Africa. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Faruqi, D. (2011). From Camp David to Cast Lead: essays on Israel, Palestine, and the future of the peace process. Lanham, Md: Lexington Books. Hunnicutt, S. (2011). The Middle East peace process. Farmington Hills. Mich: Greenhaven Press. Usher, G. (1999). Dispatches from Palestine the rise and fall of the Oslo peace process. London: Pluto Press. Read More