Retreat From the Death Penalty”, it was revealed that more criminal justice practitioners and scholars have expressed increasing opposing arguments in terms of the effectiveness of capital punishment in servicing the paramount purpose for its imposition: deterrence and retribution. As emphasized, “a distinguished committee of scholars convened by the National Research Council found that there is no useful evidence to determine if the death penalty deters serious crimes” (America’s Retreat From the Death Penalty par. 2). The result was an apparent decline in the number of executions, from a high of 98 executions in 1999 up to only 43 executions in 2012 (Facts About Death Penalty). There are still a reported number of 33 states which were noted to concur on capital punishment; and only 17 were identified as non-death penalty states (Facts About Death Penalty). At the rate that the number of executions have apparently been manifested to be on a declining trend, only confirms that the national consensus against its continued implementation has been openly relayed. One strongly believes that capital punishment is not the most effective means for crime deterrence; since it only perpetuates a system of revenge through taking the life of the perpetuator. The preservation of life has been regarded as paramount to human values and beliefs and thus, killing and taking another person’s life, to replace one that was unjustly lost, does not justify the wrong that has been done.
Cite this document
(“Death penalty for specifically identified egregious crimes Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/social-science/589844-issues-essay
(Death Penalty for Specifically Identified Egregious Crimes Essay)
“Death Penalty for Specifically Identified Egregious Crimes Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/social-science/589844-issues-essay.
Cited: 0 times
The aim of the paper “Death penalty for specifically identified egregious crimes” is to analyze one of the issues that continue to assume a controversial stance is capital punishment, death penalty for specifically identified egregious crimes…
The researcher state that he crimes that may lead to a death penalty vary from one country to another and from one religion to another. Same case applies to the methods of carrying out the execution. Some of the crimes that can warrant a death penalty are murder, treason, rape, terrorism, and even adultery in the Muslim religion.
Different religions and socio-ethical concerns of some regions of the world criticize the practice of imposing death sentence to culprits for the reason that life is a divine gift of God and men had no right to take it legally or illegally. Certain political and cultural thoughts also decline the proposal for executing the capital punishment for the reason that this system of punishment can cause disastrous implications on economic and ethical values of the society.
Although death penalty is a very harsh punishment but it is helpful in reducing the crime rate in any part of the world. Death penalty injects a sense of fear into the minds of the criminals, which makes them think twice before planning to commit any sort of violent crime.
The idea of punishable by death; however, is one which is now questioned because of the belief that one doesn’t have the right to take another life. While the death penalty creates questions on the morality and terms of the penalty, it is also impossible to determine whether this justification is right or wrong.
With the onset of human rights consciousness and concepts such as restorative justice, relying solely on the argument of retribution or “just deserts” has become problematic for those supportive of capital punishment. Likewise, with the rising spate of crime and the problems of law and order and deviant behaviour too difficult to ignore, anti-death advocates find it hard to rely on high-minded arguments on the right to life.
According to the article of Dawn Krider, guilty prisoners are sentenced to death to prevent similar crimes to happen again. However, according to the statistics given on her writing, in the twelve states that allow capital punishment, the murder rate is twice as of the rest of the states that do not allow executions.
Supporters believe that the penalty is justified (at least for murderers) by the principle of retribution, that life imprisonment is not an equally effective deterrent, and that the death penalty affirms the right to life by punishing those who violate it in the most strict form.
In addition, there exist a number of arguments in favor of and against death penalty. Thesis statement: Death penalty or capital punishment is a controversial issue but the same is the best possible way to provide justice to the victim, not the
Their agony tends to last for decades. The solution is to abolish the death penalty, and not in improved and swifter executions(Bannister, 2008, p. 167).
Over a period of 200 years, the approach to executions has
10 pages (2500 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Death penalty for specifically identified egregious crimes for FREE!