However, he also expresses concerns that reality TV has so little reality in it, and its criteria of selection or merit are often questionable, as well as the fact that no reality show can match the intelligence and layers of a tight fiction.Reality TV has boosted networks by putting them back on the pop-cultural map after losing the buzz to cable TV, because they reach tens of millions of viewers and make them feel connected to a communal experience. He notes that a large young audience heavily supports the current reality TV boom because they consider it as legitimate as dramas and sitcoms, which have slumped into a rut. He concludes on a note that reality TV may be uncomfortable because it rattles viewers' cages by provoking and offending them, but at least it is trying to do something besides helping them sleep, unlike conventional network shows, which are simply familiar and boring. Discussion It is true that reality TV has injected some new liveliness and freshness in networks by reinventing them and teaching them that they can tell involving human stories in new exciting ways than the conventional, too familiar, and boring ways that have come to be dubbed “comfortable TV.” Reality TV may be uncomfortable both in part and in whole, but that is its essence, to incite and to offend the viewers, because it thrives and survives on the viewers’ contempt, unlike conventional dramas and sitcoms. In contrast to conventional TV, which is too familiar and boring due to a serious lack of new
intriguing experiences and only serves to help viewers go to sleep, reality TV provokes and offends viewers, but still they cannot resist it since it is addictive. Reality TV has viewers in tens of millions despite them...
Why Reality TV Is Good for Us?
Literature review In the article "Why Reality TV Is Good for Us" by James Poniewozikthat appeared in The Times, Poniewozik begins by presenting the views of eight single professional women concerning reality TV; Leah Hudson, one of the women aged 30, admits she hates that they have been sucked into the Hoover vac of reality TV as if they have nothing better to do than to live vicariously glued to TV for 15 minute-fame seekers. According to Poniewozik, reality TV survives and thrives because of its viewers’ contempt for it—reality TV makes them feel tawdry, dirty, and cheap, but if it did not make them feel that way, they probably would not bother to watch it. Poniewozik then proposes that for once the audience and critics agree on something by presenting the views of some critics concerning America’s hottest TV genre, while The New York Observer contends reality TV shows how America is absorbed by misanthropy, and The San Francisco Chronicle claimsreality TV is killing the medium.
Ultimately, reality TV may be uncomfortable because it rattles viewers' cages by provoking and offending them but at least it is trying to do something besides helping them sleep; hate it or love it, reality TV is here to stay because it survives and thrives owing to its viewers’ contempt for it. Reality TV has injected freshness and liveliness in networks because it makes viewers connect to, and feel part of, a real communal experience, unlike the conventional network dramas and sitcoms that are already too familiar and boring.