StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Socrates and Machiavelli - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Socrates and Machiavelli on Citizenship, Leadership and Authority Name University Course Date Socrates and Machiavelli on Citizenship, Leadership and Authority Socrates and Machiavelli have distinct point of views when it comes to the arguments of citizenship, leadership, and authority…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.5% of users find it useful
Socrates and Machiavelli
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Socrates and Machiavelli"

Socrates and Machiavelli on Citizenship, Leadership and ity Socrates and Machiavelli on Citizenship, Leadership and Authority Socrates and Machiavelli have distinct point of views when it comes to the arguments of citizenship, leadership, and authority. When it comes to leadership, Machiavelli believed that a good leader is risk taker, confident, and aggressive. He is flexible, can easily adjust to any situation, always on guard when it comes to his subordinates and does constant planning and preparation (Fuentes, 2008).

In contrast, Socrates promoted a leader who builds and establishes rapport with his subordinates. A good leader for Socrates satisfies several roles through Socratic Method of leadership. He acts as a mentor, a follower, an instructor, a motivator and a peer (Tucker, 2007). With regards to authority, both Machiavelli and Socrates believed that power should rest to a limited number of individual since political wisdom is not distributed evenly across the population. Machiavelli also believed that authority and power are equal and power does not only belong to those who are morally good (plato.stanford.edu).

Socratic Method defined an ideal citizen as an ideal questioner and a life-long-learner while Machiavelli promoted a republican model of citizenship. LEADERSHIP According to Machiavelli, a good leader has no room for weaknesses, thus, he should enhance and utilize virtues including risk taking, confidence and aggressiveness (Fuentes, 2008). This argument might not always be true since being a leader does not mean that one is invincible. A leader should always know the right time when to take risks and when to collect intelligent advices.

With this, Socrates’ argument has a different point of view. For him, a leader should co-work with his subordinates. Rather than fully depend on him, a leader should let his subordinates be independent. He can empower selected individuals to do minor decisions and thus, lessening his burden (Tucker, 2007). Machiavelli believed in strong political leadership founded on the concept of fear and system of coercion. A leader should do anything to ensure and sustain peace and order and do any measure to achieve security and stability.

He should do constant planning and preparation wherein even in times of peace, he should not turn his mind from the study of war. He should always be on guard when it comes to his subordinates engaging in meaningful interactions among them in order to avoid problems that will later threaten the status of the organization (Fuentes, 2008). These arguments of Machiavelli may not hold for long. For one, fear is not a very good motivation for subordinates. As illustrated in history of several countries, system of coercion resulted to revolution and eventually overthrew those governments who imposed such system.

Rather than being harsh and stiff, Socrates offered a different way to look at leadership. For him leaders and subordinates are on the same level, learning things from each other. As an instructor, a leader should assist his subordinates and train them accordingly. He should motivate people, employ critical thinking skills and interact with others (Tucker, 2007). AUTHORITY According to a common view among political philosophers, political power is only for those who have virtuous moral character or to those who behave according to the conventional standards of ethical goodness.

However for Machiavelli, the difference between the legitimate and illegitimate use of power has no moral basis. Being good will not ensures one of power and being right is not sufficient to obtain and maintain political office. Thus, the only concern of a political ruler is the acquisition and maintenance of power. State of safety, security, and obedience among subordinates can be maintained through proper application of power. Fear is preferred over affection as violence and deception over legality in order to maintain authority (plato.stanford.edu).

These viewpoints of Machiavelli encourage bloodshed among citizens of a country. Rather than peace and order, a powerful but ruthless and unethical leader will give birth to rebellious citizens. Virtues define humanity. Thus, knowing and following what is morally acceptable for humans is essential to lead them. A similar perspective of Socrates supports this claim. According to him, rather than power intellectual virtues are the most valuable possessions that an individual should aim to have.

CITIZENSHIP Machiavelli believed that citizenship, liberty and republicanism are developed autonomously by each other wherein the recognition of one is linked to being aware of the other. According to him, human beings work through choice or necessity, and necessity is the primary motivating force. Necessity will oblige people to do good, obey the law and work together. On the other hand, Socrates somehow gave a concrete example of an ideal citizen. According to him, a good citizen focuses his life on the perpetual pursuit of knowledge.

He gave value to the essentiality of love and piety among each individual. For Socrates, good citizens value integrity, patriotism, political participation, piety, and unwavering obedience to the law. In general, fear, system of coercion, unethically powerful leader, and the likes are not ideal foundations of government, especially at modern times. Though too idealistic at some aspect, Socratic Method is preferable for it promotes empowerment and equality among people. References Ancient Greece. Socrates. Retrieved from on 27 March 2013.

Critchley P. (2004). Machiavelli and the Citizen Ideal. Retrieved from on 27 March 2013. Fuentes C. (2008). On Leadership and Niccolo Machiavelli. Revista Actuari@ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2009). Niccolo Machiavelli. Retrieved from on 27 March 2013. Talisse R. (2013). Socratic Citizenship. Retrieved from on 27 March 2013. Tucker M.A.A. (2007) Leadership by Socratic Method. Air and Space Power Journal Summer 2007. Villa D. (2001). Socratic Citizenship. Princeton University Press.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Socrates and Machiavelli Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/sociology/1471707-socrates-and-machiavelli
(Socrates and Machiavelli Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
https://studentshare.org/sociology/1471707-socrates-and-machiavelli.
“Socrates and Machiavelli Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1471707-socrates-and-machiavelli.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Socrates and Machiavelli

Political and Social Problems

This finds support in the works of Socrates and Machiavelli.... This is drawn from Socrates view that the ruled should obey laws as they are bound by them and machiavelli's view that government should use any means to achieve its ends.... Many political and social theorists have come up with different explanations of why individuals commit such crimes and what has to be done to solve such issues but this paper will focus on two great theorists: machiavelli and Socrates....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Niccol Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu

It also focuses on giving the distinctive qualities the leaders and citizens should have basing on both machiavelli's and Lao-Tzu's writings.... hellip; machiavelli in his most famous writing the prince presents a distinctive point of view.... machiavelli and Lao-Tzu both present their perspectives differently and intelligently.... On the topic of characters of a leader, machiavelli presents well-built judgments as to in which way a ruler should act when in power....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

The Philosophical Theories

This paper provides a careful analysis of the theories of Aristotle, Plato, and machiavelli.... nbsp; Also, the author describes how machiavelli's positions have contrasted greatly with the views of Aristotle and Plato, particularly their views on the government and the State....
16 Pages (4000 words) Term Paper

The Value System: How does It Develop

As the report declares the writings and thoughts of Socrates and Machiavelli outline a deeper sense of political activity for philosophers.... Socrates was an idealist, and machiavelli was a pragmatic realist.... Thus it is often difficult to identify which ideas belong to socrates and which belong to Plato.... Niccoló machiavelli and Socrates were separated by major changes in government, society and philosophy that took place in the time between Ancient Greece and the Italian Renaissance....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

The Theory of Philosophy

They no longer see a place for philosophers like machiavelli, Socrates, Locke, and Hobbes.... machiavelli, for example, was a reluctant philosopher, perceiving himself as a historian and an academic.... The term “Machiavellian” was coined in his honor to reference someone who cleverly excels in machiavelli's preferred areas; ethics, politics, and psychological phenomena (Nederman ).... nbsp; socrates is a fascinating character of philosophical history; he remains somewhat of a mystery to scholars....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Analyze Machiavelli and Plato and their relationship to each other

In the Prince, he begins by talking on how the two monarchies that existed quickly moved to retain a rebel territory that had been conquered (machiavelli & Parks, 2009).... He continues in explaining how the prince was supposed to rule the people he acquired after conquering a new territory and tells of the different ways to govern a city that was used to its liberty and independence (machiavelli & Parks, 2009).... There is also the other side of machiavelli where he talks about the end justifying the means and this is Machiavellis side of the republic....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Machiavelli's Advice to Obama

The essay “machiavelli's Advice to Obama” is the hypothetical assumption on the machiavelli, Galileo, and Aristotle's advice to a guarantor of the US constitution.... nbsp; Some of the most popular philosophers in politics include machiavelli (known as a pattern of ruthless or amoral leadership through subterfuge and the strict maintenance of public image), Galileo (who was persecuted for his scientific discoveries and exposures of the past's frauds), and Aristotle, who set up intensely intricate categories for reason as well as ethics....
15 Pages (3750 words) Essay

The Impact of Machiavelli and Aristotle on Political Thought and Statecraft

The author of this essay describes the impact of machiavelli and Aristotle on political thought and statecraft.... He is the creator of modern scientific terminology who founded and classified the various sciences extant today' (Jayasinghe 2009)That machiavelli's reputation is somewhat more controversial can be ascertained from the dictionary definitions of the word 'Machiavellian'.... The Shorter Oxford Dictionary begins straightforwardly enough with the definition of 'Machiavellian' as a noun: 'A person who adopts the principles recommended by machiavelli in his treatise on statecraft'; and then, as an adjective: 'Of, pertaining to, or characteristic of machiavelli or his principles, adopting unscrupulous methods; duplicitous, deceitful, cunning, scheming'....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us