While doing so the quintessential objective of the sociologists is to conceptualize the varied social fundamentals and essentials, and their working. In that context the two basic orientation frameworks or theoretical perspectives resorted to by the contemporary sociologists are the symbolic interactionist perspective and the structural functionalist perspective. Structural functionalism is a sociological perspective that tends to be broad in its scope and intentions. The essential approach of structural functionalism is that it interprets society as a structure that has multiple interrelated parts (Propora 15). The prominent objective of structural functionalist perspective is to analyze society as a whole, while taking it to be a function of its number of constituent elements that are norms, institutions, traditions and customs (Propora 15). Structural functionalism is essentially an organic or perhaps anthropological approach towards sociology that takes society to be akin to a body, which relies on the proper functioning of its various parts or organs to work properly (Barnard 61). The analytical approach of structural functionalism is to assign and impute to every custom, practice or feature its exact scope and relevance in a stable and cohesive mother system. As per the structural functionalist perspective, each and every aspect of the society happens to be interdependent and do contributes to the overall functioning of the society. Structural functionalist perspective in sociology is often criticized for its inability to explain social change and for justifying status quo. In contrast, symbolic interactionist is a perspective in sociology which instead of being broad based like structural functionalism; tend to focus on micro level social interactions. Unlike structural functionalism, which has been of relevance in disciplines like anthropology, symbolic interactionism has been especially conducive to the sub-disciplines like social psychology and urban sociology. Symbolic interactionism intends the sociologists to focus on the details and symbols existing in the day to day life, the actual social relevance and meaning of those symbols and how do people interpret these symbols and use them to interact with each other (Buechler 21). As per the symbolic interactionist perspective of sociology, people ascribe meaning to symbols and do tend to socially interact as per the subjective meanings that they ascribe to these symbols (Dentler 46). This subjective interpretation of symbols is especially evident in verbal conversations where the words are used as symbols to convey meanings. A word having a particular meaning for sender may not hold the same meaning for a receiver. Hence, the symbolic interactionists devote serious importance to how people act and the meanings they ascribe to their own and others’ actions and symbols. Critics do blame symbolic interactionism for being incapable of focusing on the larger picture and to facilitate a macro level interpretation of social phenomenon. Pragmatically speaking about these two sociological perspectives, it would be erroneous to say that one is better than the other. The fundamental thing that needs to be noticed is that these two perspectives analyze and observe the social phenomenon from two different vantage points, thereby
Cite this document
(“Structural Functionalist and Symbolic Interactionist Perspectives in Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/sociology/48737-compare-and-contrast-the-structural-functionalist
(Structural Functionalist and Symbolic Interactionist Perspectives in Essay)
“Structural Functionalist and Symbolic Interactionist Perspectives in Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/sociology/48737-compare-and-contrast-the-structural-functionalist.
Cited: 1 times
Name of the of the Concerned Professor Sociology Structural Functionalist and Symbolic Interactionist Perspectives in Sociology In their attempt to make sense out of social phenomenon, sociologists tend to analyze social phenomenon at varied levels and from multiple perspectives…
The concept of ‘self’ point towards a trajectory of scientific belief which deviate itself from the biological theory and emphasize on the process of social interactions (Pfohl, 1977, p. 221). The stigmas or the social labeling arise from those interactions and the social authority is highly depended on the authorities themselves.
Sociology is a continuously evolving science and it is far more different from the day it started. The research and other work in this science are not done by scientists but by sociologists who put forth their theories and perspectives to give a new path to this study.
The perspectives are conflict theory, symbolic interactionism and structural functionalism. The following three scholars and theorists have been associated with the development of social perspectives Karl Max, Emile Durkheim and Max Weber. The three categories of social perspectives fall under two social patterns or also known as levels, which are either a micro or a macro.
Each person is clearly different, and at the same time all people in a society share some elements in common. Sociologists use several different approaches to explore the relationship between the individual and society, and although there is no single explanation that explains everything, there are useful insights to be gained from each of the main perspectives.
Dramaturgy and symbolic interactionism are two such theories. Dramaturgy is a social theory that postulates that people live their lives as actors who, in every social situation act in order to bring the results they wish. Dramaturgy revolves around the fact that people want to create the best impression of themselves to other people.
Margaret is 41 years of age and is married to Cyril who is 47. Robert and Caroline are their children. Margaret is working as a care worker for an agency involved with offering care services for physical and mentally retarded individuals. On the other hand, Cyril is employed with a firm providing stationery as well as office equipments as an office manager.
Question 1 Functionalist theory of sociology posits that society is made of functional parts which depend on each other. Functionalist theory argues that the society acts as one big organism which has so many parts which act collectively to achieve the common goal of keeping the organism alive.
To do that, he must use his brother’s avatar to win the hearts of the natives of Pandora, the Na’vi. Also, the avatar is important so that the humans could explore Pandora without having to wear life support