The methods applied in the situation, shows that the strategy ensures that individuals ability to make any conclusions concerning a certain group; beyond the method used to unify the group in the first place proves nil. Biologically, human beings inherit traits independently; this means that, no one individual, will ever have an identical trait of the other individual. The fact that, an individual knows something about another does not guarantee the latter to make a second opinion of the group the individual originates.
Individuals, sometime, lack the understanding that categorization proves cultural, and not scientific. Racial categorization experiences transformation basis owes the change to geographical and industrial relations. Brazil proves having the most of racial groups than the United States. Countries like Haiti, traces of European roots make an individual white. This proves that the methods of categorization varies with the groups involves (Wall, 98).
According to Katz (245), there appear various parallelisms pertaining to groups. There appears as no genetic material, mannerism, or features that discern all the associates of one race from the members of a different race. The social make up of a society illuminate the discrepancies in the procedure used to define a group. The United States appears to have a different definition application to different racial and ethnic groups. The state terms anyone tribally affiliated to the North and South America as American Indian or sometimes Alaskan Native. Asians refers to the people originally from Far East, Southern Asia or the Indian subcontinents. Individuals with relations from the African continents are referred to as Black or African Americans. The Mexicans, Puerto Rican, Central American and other Spanish speaking populations are termed as Hispanic / Latino. Individuals from pacific Islands or Hawaii, Guam, Samoa appear as, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islanders. The