There are Catholic countries, for instance, which have influential religious sectors that influence public policy and the polity in general. Then, there is the theocratic form of government, found in few states that effectively combined religion with the government. This is now the focus of this paper. It is difficult to determine the extent of influence of non-theocratic countries but highly influential clerics or religious institutions because of the sheer diversity of these cases. In order to provide clear arguments, this paper will evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of theocracy. What is Theocracy? Unarguably, once theocracy is mentioned, one would inevitably think about Iran and grim faced clerics issuing edicts and penalizing nonbelievers. While there is some semblance of truth to this, theocracy does not necessarily get defined according to the Iranian model. According to DeMar (2008), the Iranian form of government is considered ecclesiocracy wherein the Church is the primary and absolute governing institution of society. (p. 207) Rather, the system is a category for a kind of government that recognizes God as the government and that the family, the Church and the various levels of civil jurisdiction answers to this singular ideal government. If one turns to the 2012 Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, the definition states that it is: 1) government of a state by immediate divine guidance or by officials who are regarded as divinely guided; 2) a state governed by a theocracy. An excellent example is the state of Israel. In this case the government is not ruled by rabbis but by civil servants but that governance is strongly influenced by religion, hence, the so-called concept of “divinely guided”. It is not unlike saying that the government of Israel is being held by men until such time that the messiah reassume his rule. With this cleared, one could finally identify the system’s advantages and disadvantages. Advantages Fundamentally, theocracy could enforce discipline and obedience from individuals and governance would therefore be easy. Policymaking and policy implementations would be swift. There would be less dissension and polarization. The citizenry will be inclined to follow rules and would be morally upright. There are numerous other related variables but the idea is clear: the religious variable will reinforce the government’s power in the exercise of its mandate, responsibilities and objectives. Put in another way, in theocracy, governments appear to be more legitimate from the point of view of its subjects. The case of Israel is an excellent demonstration. It was created only in 1948 but it has rapidly become a developed and powerful state, starting from scratch. It has fended off a wave of attacks from many of its Arab neighbors and the sheer determination and efficiency of the Israeli in the series of conflicts demonstrated the strength of a country united by the religious element that closely resembles but more potent than ideology that drives nationalism. Indeed, Lenzi (2006) explained that theocracy is really nothing but a form of government that uses a particular religion as a political ideology. (p. 208) Disadvantages According to the definition of theocracy, it can characterize a democracy or other form
Cite this document
(“The Separation of Church and State Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/sociology/56693-the-link-between-church-state
(The Separation of Church and State Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“The Separation of Church and State Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/sociology/56693-the-link-between-church-state.
Cited: 0 times
The Separation of the Church and the State Your Name School Abstract: This paper provides the advantages and disadvantages of a close link or even the union of the church and the state. They are outlined and explained through a discussion of theocracy. The main point of the paper is that while there are advantages involved in this form of political system, it poses several problems for highly humanistic societies such as the United States…
Religious Freedom: A Freedom that is not Fully Established
There is a great number of problems with the original amendments to the Constitution because they are often written in a way that s a lot of space for interpretation.
The First Amendment provides freedom of religion as far as most of people have interpreted the law.
At one end of the spectrum were members of imperial royalty, whose purpose was one of administration and control of the colonies. At the other end are impoverished masses escaping political/religious prosecution in their native lands.
These techniques include conventional ones such as the distillation techniques, chromatographic techniques, crystallization and solvent extraction, and an emerging separation technique that is based on bioaccumulation of isoprenoids by metabolically engineered microorganisms.
At the time of the inclusion of this provision in the American constitution, it was seen as a revolutionary and progressive policy to adopt. 2- Where did it originate? Is it the US constitution, what did Thomas Jefferson mean when he spoke of maintaining "a wall of separation between church and state?
Jefferson would once say, “Bacon, Locke, Newton ... I consider them as the three greatest men that have ever lived, without any exception, and as having laid the foundation of those superstructures which have been raised in the Physical and Moral sciences" (‘Three Greatest Men’).
The place was extremely peaceful and serene. The undertone decorations and lighting just made it even more welcoming. I happen to study church practice at two times, one when the church was full of people and one when it was almost empty. At both times, the only difference was the number of people.
The civil rights movement in America between 1955 and 1968 aimed to abolish racial discrimination against African Americans. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964) was a United States Supreme Court case that established
Through the years, Korean Baptist Church has been cherishing a thoughtful biblically based faith. It is committed to proclaim Jesus Christ’s teachings to the nation and the whole world. The church has been a Christ centered congregation who takes
In the ruling, it was determined that any teacher and/or school official who leads a class in prayer is violating the separation of church and state as guaranteed in the First Amendment (Engel 18). Rulings in subsequent years have elaborated on this idea with the