Furthermore, the American food policy entails food and nutrition programs for those who cannot afford food. This begs the question why more than 50 million Americans are suffering from hunger.
From a political perspective, lack of political will and divergent politics leads to increasing hunger in America (Alliance to End Hunger, 2015). Indeed, most of the American Presidents including Obama made election pledges to end hunger but have done nothing to alienate the problem. Moreover, few elected officials or media are discussing this issue (Goldman et al., 2012). From a government perspective, there is an assumption that the poor prefer to depend on the food donations and stamps from the federal and state government because they are generous and certain. However, the documentary shows that these government policies are not effective and hence could not shield America from the persistent hunger (Goldman et al., 2012).
Indeed, the directors present the inefficiency of the food-stamp system that disqualifies the working class from federal donations. Moreover, the government policies seem to reward cheap junk foods and overprice fresh fruits and vegetables thus hindering the availability of health food (Goldman et al., 2012). The film presents the views of an advocate for the hungry who points out the inefficiencies of government subsidies. Apparently, the government subsidizes the production of grains but does nothing to support the production of affordable fruits and vegetables (Goldman et al., 2012). As such, although the government is addressing hunger, the benefits of such policies do not solve the hunger problem since the working class and the unemployed still lack the ability to buy healthy food (Bread for the World, 2015). This leads to fundamental health challenges since the hunger-stricken Americans are vulnerable to obesity,