Strain theory, however, concentrates on individual behavior’s that heighten crime. These constitute the unique stressors that push one to commit crime. Inability to achieve a goal, lack of positive energy, for instance, the death of a relative and the introduction of negative energy, like emotional and physical abuse, are some of those stressors. Consequently, one may indulge in crime to offset or counter such forces.
Various theories have emerged before to define and explain crime. One such theory is Robert Agnew’s strain theory. Indeed, the subject of criminology is subject to many social, political, and economic changes. Consequently, Agnew’s approach makes a comparison of his theory with that of other previous methods. For instance, the first strain theory insinuated that aspiration’s increase together with expectation decrease resulted to delinquency. In addition, the original method showed that the rate of criminal activity was higher in the low-class community compared to the middle and upper classes. However, Agnew proved both the theories wrong and inaccurate. In addition, the original theory ignored factors like relinquishment of crime in late teenage years and the value of relationships of the family. Agnew’s strain theory however included such variables, together with others. Therefore, he gave an exploration of the stress theory from goals rather than money, and, additionally gave a consideration of all the classes in social society. Hence, the basis of his theory is that people get distressed and indulge into crime due to mistreatment. In his theory, still, he proposes measures of strain, strain types, connection that exists between crime and strain and offers recommendations on the policy that base upon the theory.
In social disorganization theory, various theories explain the concept. An example is the Sampson & Wilsons theory, which posits that most crimes come by due to social isolation,