In addition, victimisation of women in the series is not seen as a problem as long as the partners are intimate with one another. Indeed, the article claims that some of the actions in the series should be considered sexual assault but, because the characters are intimate, violence against the female is not objectionable. Finally, the article also notes how the series suggests that women accept subordination as long as they are in love, concluding that the gender norms reflected in the series are harmful to young women (Hayes-Smith 79).
This article connects to the sociological concept of gender construction, which allows society to organise its lives in predictable and consistent ways, specifically by prescribing the ease of interaction and behaviour with people from other genders. When such a normative behaviour becomes rigidly defined as proposed by the article, the individual’s freedom is compromised (Ore 29). This is specifically so where the rigid definitions lead to development of stereotypes, in which negative traits such as insecurity and submission can be used to justify discrimination against members of a specific gender. In this case, the article connects to stereotyping of women in the gender concept, which also relates to sexism or the belief that males are superior to the status of females. Females have less prestige and less power, which connects to the article’s assertion that the female characters in the book are subservient to men. Furthermore, this sexism as identified in the article is perpetuated by male-dominated, patriarchy systems and social structures that cause oppression of women (Lober & Farrell 34). In such social structures, gender roles are structured by a specific script for females and another for males, which is supported by the article.
The reason why this article was selected is because gender representations in popular