Comparison Paper on two Scultpture Pieces - Assignment Example

Comparison paper on two sculpture pieces Art is a form of communication through illustrations. It articulates the ideas in a design through its diagrammatic expression. In my research, I managed to use two sculptures, one is the Scribe Statue of Amunhotep, Son of Nebiry and the other one is the Buddha sited on a lion table. In this context, I have managed to give a detailed comparison of the two structures from different artistic angles. By deeply analyzing the Buddha sculpture, one would notice the how he seat legs folded.

The fact that he is seated on a table of lions denotes great power. In many literatures, the lion is always referred to as the King of the Jungle. Buddha by sitting on the lions depicts his attention to be having great power or serving a powerful master. The symbolic effect of a lion displays the character of Buddha. On the other hand, Amunhotep also in his sculpture is denoted sitting on a slab on which words have been written in hylogyriphics. Between this two figures, Buddha is depicted to be having more power than Amunhotep (Dauber 561).

Leaves and branch shoots indicate life in Buddha sculpture. These artistic figures are seen at the peak and sides of Buddha’s sculpture. Trees are usually symbols of life since the contain life in themselves and are used to enhance life as well by providing food to other living organisms. Them being in this sculpture associates Buddha to life aspects. Sculpture of Amunhotep does not have a background of items behind it. Its surrounding is plain. Also in Buddha sculpture presents a number of pictures displaying men looking at him a number at him are also evident (Dauber 561).

This could mean he is drawing attention by whatever he is doing that is why the men were staring or listening to him or it could also mean that he holds a lot of power that is why people envy him. Amunhotep’s sculpture displays him seated is seated, but in front of him is a scroll. Scrolls in the ancient world were used as writing materials or sources of written information. This is to cite Egypt as a perfect example. This would indicate that he is either an academician of a priest. It is evident that the Egyptians treasured literacy and learning above all skills, including military prowess and physical strength.

They also mastered writing and reading, and this is what the scribe represents. Amunhotep in this sculpture seats with legs crossed and face slightly inclined to the position of the scribe indicating a sign of literacy. In contrast, Buddha does not have any book in his hand in his sculpture. In Buddha’s sculpture, the sole of his legs face up ward while resting on his thighs while the in Amunhotep sculpture the sole of his feet is not shown. In addition, Amunhotep is depicted as very bare-chested while Buddha is covered half way.

Mode of wearing usually depicts the culture and time. Buddha uses a shoal to cover himself (Dauber 562). This is a sign of the ancient culture. In Buddha’s sculpture, he is shown to have raised his right hand and stretching his fingers. This is a symbol of peace and shows this to the people he is addressing. In addition, Buddha displays a serious visage expression. He portrays the character of a leader who is keen in what he is doing. It also displays a sense of dictatorship. Buddha by his somehow waving sign implies that he is at peace with whomever he is greeting since he draws much attention so it draws away the perception of dictatorship.

In contrast, Amunhotep seems to be expressing a face that shows seriousness and this could be related to the work he was doing. Amunhotep held the rank of a high priest and administrative offices and hence required to be serious at the jobs he was assigned (Dauber 562). Looking at Amunhotep head, something like a crown covers his head. Lawmakers or priests in Egypt mostly wore this. This might display his form of authority and decision making powers. Buddha on the other hand also has a crown spiraling to the top.

Such an ornament could indicate power but in a different view. It might be religious powers as priests and leaders in the ancient communities used this design of crowns. Buddha’s sculpture makes one to have the feeling of stillness as he seems at peace with himself and the environment. In contrast, Amunhotep sculpture denotes a serious mood. The moods behind each of the sculpture were associated with the position these two held at that time. In conclusion, both Buddha and Amunhotep sculptures use the notion of art to display different meanings as they show similarity and differences in their symbolic interpretations.

Art in this case can be used to convey meaning in a headed language. Works Cited Dauber, Kenneth. “Object, Genre, and Buddhist Sculpture.”Theory and Society. 21.4 (1992): 561-592