The essay "Seurat’s and Rousseau's painting" analyzes the art of Rousseau and Seurat. Seurat’s painting is very different. It shows a social scene: People dressed and socializing on a sunny Sunday in Paris. Everyone is wearing their special costume. They carry umbrellas to protect their skin from the sun. While the savage is naked in Rousseau’s painting, everyone in Seurat’s seems overdressed. The style of painting is different too. Seurat has painted points. In a way this shows the atomism of French society at the time. Even when people appear to be together they are actually apart from one another. The Rousseau painting is much more romantic that the Seurat painting. The light is flatter. It is an almost dream-like sequence in a jungle. The colours are primitive and basic. The artist is showing us pure nature and asking us to breathe it in. We see the animals and the naked savage who is also part of this scene. The scene is extraordinary in its embrace of nature. The sky looks beautiful and the moon is full. The flowers look like we could almost reach out and touch them. They are almost like museum pieces. Both of these paintings are extraordinary masterpieces. Both capture a moment of time in an indelible manner. The scale of both paintings is somewhat realistic. There are figures in both and both artists are French. There are however a number of important differences which must be properly noted. Both painters were French geniuses. But the style and subject of both paintings is very
ptimism in an age of enlightenment that forced philosophers to contemplate about freedom from the dogma and oppression presented by the Church. Thus, it will be right to consider the age and the place in which Rousseau lived to understand better his thinking about the concept of ‘general will’.
During this period writers and thinkers increasingly shifted their focus to the self. In this way, feelings and passions became foregrounded. Rousseau himself has been considered one of the progenitors of the Romantic Movement (Melzer, p. 3). This essay examines Rousseau’s ‘Confessions’ in terms of the specific ways that it articulates notions of the self.
He became famous with his article on the 'Progress of the Arts and Sciences' in which he disputed against progress as it disconnected men from their normal state.
Rousseau believed the Social Contract as the fundamental law of society. Liberty is submission to the law the people have accepted, and equality means all are equally dependent on society and not on any other individual.
Even scholars have defined amour-propre in the aspect of being egocentric while sustaining in the society.
Many social critics have perceived the meaning in a most determined manner that they have forced others as well to believe that Rousseau's claim of 'self-love' aims at making political institutions as tools of oppression and that even so much influenced by the 'materialism' of the society that they have forgotten that what Rousseau meant was the problem of honor that lies at the heart of Rousseau's concerns.
Rousseau's numerous works mostly written in the form of a dialogue with his thinkers of the past such as Plato, Locke and Hobbes offered a new perspective on social, moral, political, and economic relationships between people.
The founding principles of Rousseau's sociological ideas and political philosophy are clearly identified in the introductory paragraphs of his famous Discourses.
This essay analyzes Painting of Modern era. According to Greenberg, the essential nature of modernism lies intrinsically in the determination of each piece of art’s (painting or sculpture) unique and irreducible character. To him, this process would render the art ‘pure’, and it is this purity which would establish its standards of quality and independence.
Both romanticism and impressionism periods had a unique form of art that were highly regarded at its era and had substantial links to culture and religious practice of its time. The romanticism movement came into existence around the second half of the 18th century and developed further during the industrial revolution in Western Europe.
problem” for political society is how to find a form of association which will defend the person and goods of each member with the collective force of all, and under which each individual, while uniting himself with the others, obeys no one but himself, and remains as free as
Rousseau comes to the following conclusion: the main advantage of verbal interaction lies in that it is able to convey feelings and passions while gestures are hardly useful for that. The philosopher goes further and develops
Landscape painting is the depiction in art of the landscapes which includes natural sceneries like mountains, valleys, forests, rivers and even trees particularly where the main subject is a wide view. The following history, the relationship between Americans and nature has been very complex. The reverence for the land spirits is deeply embedded.
1 pages (250 words)Coursework
Cite this document
(“Seurats and Rousseau's painting Admission/Application Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/visual-arts-film-studies/496325-seurats-and-rousseaus-painting
(Seurats and Rousseau'S Painting Admission/Application Essay)
“Seurats and Rousseau'S Painting Admission/Application Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/visual-arts-film-studies/496325-seurats-and-rousseaus-painting.
Cited: 0 times
The essay compares the art of Rousseau and Seurat. Both of these paintings are extraordinary masterpieces. Both capture a moment of time in an indelible manner. The scale of both paintings is somewhat realistic. There are figures in both and both artists are French. …