Scientific Integrity - Essay Example

Your F. 18 March Thoughts On Scientific Integrity Many of the policies that are being developed are either by large corporations that would be affected by these regulations or by politicians. Many government agencies are making policies in areas of each of their expertise, however, the influence for them is from the pressure put on them by corporate and political interference. The common goal of scientific policies are to typically help the general public and protect them from any issues that arise in the sectors of health, environment and safety and though sometimes politics have a common interest in these areas, many times their knowledge is just in politics and regulation and lacking in the particular areas where scientists are the ones who are the experts.

Though politicians allegedly have the interest of the common good in mind, however, if the issue somehow interferes with the belief of their party affiliation or platform, it can determine how politicians vote on regulation. The article in regards to Feymans commencement speech addresses that the scientific method should always be used and it is scientific integrity to tell all evidence, whether it proves or disproves a theory and even recognizes that politicians may describe something scientific in a way that works in their favor, rather than looking at it from the scientific point of view.

Errors in science are not necessarily scientific in nature but instead by human error and lack of intelligent judgment. Politicians are the people in power that can help make the regulations and it is necessary in some cases for regulations to be set to protect the people. However, they are uninformed which makes it impossible for them to make intelligent suggestions about policy.