It had always been a matter of litigation: Who will be take the complete responsibility of remarking Remarking shakes the trust placed on the education system and there is a psychological uncertainty attached to it as against the absolute trust in the fairness of the exam marking system.
In recent years, remarking of exam papers has come under acute scrutiny. In 2001-2002, this had been a big issue in the GCSE and A-levels examinations because the grades were very different from expectations and widely fluctuated. Questions like should the students be compensated if there is a legal action, has cropped up many times. This also resulted in some students taking a gap year. Students and parents were both disturbed by this years grading and it had not been easy for anybody. But schools were told that the variations are normal and had to be accepted1. There was an enquiry by the watchdog QCA and the question is not completely answered who and how the remarking should take place. Confusion has created a crisis.
In 2001, A-level examinations saw 4,194 candidates had their grades increased by the normal procedure which rather shook the trust in the exam system. In 2002, BBC reported that A-level students can ask for re-marking. "Over 12,000 pupils across Wales have discovered they may have had their A-level papers incorrectly marked after English examination boards admitted they downgraded some results". http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/2268475.stm
In 2002, during the crisis of remarking, The Chief Executive of the qualifications and curriculum authority gave exam boards and connected officials to come up with new guidelines as the existing guidelines proved inadequate. In 2003, exam board replaced paper marking with US designed technology to improve the speed and process.
In 2005, more than 18,000 A-level and GCSE examination grades were changed after complaining. According to The Qualifications and Curriculum Authority's report, 53,600 of the 6.7 million A and AS-level entries were challenged. Of the six million GCSE, 48,422 enquiries happened and out of them 10.773 were altered. These figures relate to the five main exam boards, AQA, Edexzcel, OCR, WJEC and CCEA2. The revised grades helped many students in their university admissions.
Government3 was of the opinion that regional centres of the exam boards would carry out the remaking as usual on priority because the deadline for remarking was almost over on every occasion and a fresh deadline was necessary to be authorised from the QCA. Over the recent years, there were rumours that wrong grades had been awarded and there was widespread unhappiness that lower grades caused problems during university admissions and funding possibilities which will in turn have problems on teaching and accommodation facilities etc. as a lower grade would create a continuous chain reaction, more so, when the student was sure of getting a better grade. The so-called gold standard exam has created unnecessary uncertainty which is rather unfortunate. If the exam results are significantly worse than expectation and are almost beyond belief, it becomes necessary to ask for a remarking instead of nursing a grievance that could become a psychological stumbling block.
Teachers are equally mystified not knowing mostly what exactly the Board is looking for. Students are uncertain about re-sits. Some of the students who got upgraded after the review were happy, but the confusion and lack of trust in the system prevailed. Many questions were asked: Is it necessary to move away from standard based assessments Are there better ways of marking so that a remarking is not called for If remarking becomes an absolute necessity, are there better wa ...
Cite this document
(“Remarking Public Exams Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/education/273452-remarking-public-exams
(Remarking Public Exams Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
“Remarking Public Exams Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/education/273452-remarking-public-exams.
When a college student cheats on an exam, they take someone else’s work and use it as their own, whether they bring in a cheat sheet to the exam or copy from the paper of a nearby peer. Cheating is the implementing of the work or idea of another and taking full credit for it by not acknowledging that it came from someone else.
In the current times, contemporary organisations acknowledge the strategic potential benefits of recruitment, selection and appraisal to improve organisational performance1. A lot of emphasis is placed getting the ‘right person’ for the job. Selecting the ‘right person’ for the job means that the process of personnel selection is characterised by formalisation, reliability and validity.
There are two sides to every coin, and the issue of whether or not to continue mandating high school exit exams is no exception. Hence, this essay is designed to examine the current data regarding these exams, especially in correlation to high school dropout rates.
One of the widely accepted reasons why few high school students progress to college is the high cost of college education. However, Greene & Winters (2004), suggest that the real reason for this is the generally poor quality of high school graduates in the entire USA.
“One of the principal concerns of any examining body is to ensure that its examinations are marked reliably. It is essential that each examiner is applying the same standard from one script to the next, just as it is essential that each examiner is marking to the
In the eight years since its inception, it has become clear that further participation in the War on Terror would only worsen the security situation in and around Australia. An indication of what is in store can be learnt from the Bali bombing of October 2002, which
Thus, in the electronic age, documents have expanded their functionality manifold from the age of paper documents. John Seely Brown saw documents as more than mere pieces of information, and as instruments that form and link communities together. This is precisely what
The author states that due to the advancement in technology, authentication can be performed by using features as unique as biometrics. Biometric recognition systems can be used to authenticate students in e-exams. Biometrics used for recognition includes hand geometry, fingerprints, facial characteristics, iris and palm-prints etc.
The critical stages are developing good study habits, composure during the final exam day and mock review stage where the exam candidate reviews test preparation strategies.
First, an exam candidate should prepare a realistic and unbiased